And this again hardens my opinion, that the false FDR data came from a real plane, departing from Gate D18 or D20 on 9/11, while the real Flight 77
really departed from its usual Gate D26 at 08:10:46 a.m. that morning.
And that real Flight 77 then impacted the Pentagon, as witnessed by a whole crowd of people who all gave their testimonies of seeing a passenger plane
impacting the first floor slab of the west wall of the Pentagon.
That means, that the whole Pentagon attack was a military/political false flag operation planned by mass-murderers, which was meticulously planned at
forehand, and the plane that departed from D18 or D20, was pre-destined to offer its FDR's bulk data for the false FDR handed over years later.
Probably they only erased for example the last 10 minutes, and re-wrote the last 10 minutes FDR data from Flight 77 into the so formed gap in the
false FDR data, changing also all the panick inputs from the pilots who realized that their plane was taken over by remote soft- and hardware. We have
found quite some articles which offered witnesses who saw that the real FDR and CVR from the wrecked parts of the plane in the Pentagon were found
near the impacted wall, inside the Pentagon.
Then the handlers of 9/11 got it in their hands, and switched data on that tape or solid state memory from that real FDR, making it now a falsified
FDR, ready for FOIA release.
Again, why all that trouble? What was on those last 10 minutes of the real FDR in first instance, before it got erased by the 9/11 handlers?
Did the crew thought until the last 10 minutes that they were acting in a nation wide drill, as there were 7 such drills running on 9/11?
Don't you find that a tad bit too much coincidence, so many drills exactly on 9/11?
It's obvious, those drills were part of the planning, to let the pilots involved think nearly to the end, that they were actors in a nation wide
national security drill.
And when the secretly build-in remote hardware, took over from the CIA handled "hijackers" pilots, of course they will have shouted and pulled and
pushed all kind of cockpit instruments during those last 10 minutes.
And that was to be erased from the original Flight 77 its CVR (Cockpit Voice Recorder) and FDR (Flight Data Recorder).
I am quite sure now, that all planes on 9/11 were told that they acted inside a nationwide drill, and were all taken over by secretly build-in
software + hardware in the last minutes.
And all the so-called "hijackers" were patsies, working already for years for the CIA or any one of the other alphabet soup agencies in the USA, GB,
France or Israel.
And were killed in the planes, they too were thinking were playing in a drill.
The whole operation must have been a multinational plot, orchestrated on a huge scale by the global puppetmasters who are the real power holders in
those mentioned countries and probably a few countries more.
And I hope you, my readers, do now at last understand why I distrust Balsamo and think he's an agent-provocateur, or taken over by a "handler", who
is in most such cases a real good IT admin ( but in fact working for f.ex. a US or other country's agency) who offers his help online to a non
IT-saffy 9/11 website owner.
The best sign is that he directly banned me, after I posted the Boeing Fast Alignment Procedure screenshot, inside those three screenshots from the
INS/IRS pages from the Boeing 757-200 flight manual.
For me, this is a sure sign that he is a planted distractor.
Because he knew what my next posts would be, he knew that Jan Zelman already posted that little red oval in his Gate D20 taxi path picture, and he
and/or his handlers realized they had to ban me, or their distractions would be exposed.
And I was also coming far too near in nailing him with his distraction from the NoC witnesses, unrealistic fly-over theory in my only thread at his
Title : ""The Pentagon Attack Arguments List : Fly-over, Or Head-on Impact?, Just two options left : NoC fly-over, or NoC 90° impact.""
And I am not ready with that, by far not, now I am even far more motivated to expose his fly-over theory as the fraud it is, all over the whole
Balsamo first nested on the Internet with his P49/11T forums in August 2006 but communicated with CIT already earlier, I suppose, to neutralize Craig
Ranke and Aldo Marquis and friends.
And especially their immense important evidence for a North of CITGO gas station flying Flight 77 just seconds before impact.
By winning their trust with his pilot techno babble, and then convincing them with the same techno babble, that Flight 77 had not and could not
impacted the Pentagon, but flew over it, because he "proved" to them, that that plane, at that speed (coming from a false FDR ! All those last
minutes pre-impact data are false! ) could not have impacted at the first floor slab.
There was a very real impact however, seen by a whole crowd of witnesses at first hand, most no more than 100 meters away from the impact, many much
closer. Some much further, but they all saw a jetliner fly INTO the Pentagon.
And those two non-aviation schooled 9/11 "hobbyists" fell hook, line and sinker for his aviation circles "authority".
And thus immediately started the downfall of their own glorious NoC-thesis.
What an immense sad development !
Because in the eyes of an overload of 9/11 interested people, that fly-over theory is so ridiculous, they all automatically distrust their, CIT,
Citizen Investigation Team world-first TRUE findings, namely those 13 North of CITGO eyewitnesses, who all however say they saw a NoC flying plane,
and saw or expected it impacting seconds thereafter at the west wall of the Pentagon. Because they saw it impact, or saw the billowing smoke after the
And no one saw a plane continuing flying over the roofs of the Pentagon.
And I would like to continue my debate here at ATS, with all the misleaded members from the P49/11T forums, who are so brainwashed by their idol
Balsamo, that they can't accept all the massive evidence I already laid in front of them in my first and last thread on their forum, that so brutally
was cut off by Balsamo.
I found an additional 6 more, for many years now, former SoC accepted, but clearly NoC eyewitness accounts for them, to add to their 13 already found
And what does Aldo do to thank me for that?
He gets very nervous, because those six new NoC witnesses ALL saw from very close by, that plane that strafed over their heads or cars, did IMPACT,
but they were also positioned in front of the Helipad, which they all say was the left side boundary of the impacting plane's left wing
path......Which means that the officially pushed South sided flight path of Flight 77 is blatantly falsified.
First he begged Balsamo for help in my "impact or Fly-over" thread (moved by Balsamo to their Debate forum), and when that help came down to
ridiculing me in my "Impact or Fly-over" thread there by Balsamo, based on Balsamo's far too simple high-school based fixed speed and fixed arc
fly-over "thesis", and then declaring that I did not give him a same arc back, to back-up my impact thesis, Aldo had the guts to paint me as a
thrill seeker, while they know very well from the beginning of their posting here at ATS, who I was and what I stand for.
Btw, go and look up in my "Impact or Fly-over" thread at P49/11T Debate Forum, my FIRST picture of an arc flown by the real attack and impacting
plane, leading over the heads of ALL the CIT witnesses, where any intelligent person could see the center point of my arc in that picture, placed in
the white far right bottom corner. I wrote under it where to find it and how to use it with your pair of compasses.
(My second one, with the full drawn arc in it, is at the end of my OP of this thread here at ATS now, which is basically the same, I only drew those
thin blue lines, that any basic school student could have imagined immediately in my "blank" arc picture at P49/11T, at first sight).
But Balsamo, obnoxious as always, dared to keep repeating that I had not give them yet, a viable arc, while it was in front of their probably half
blinded eyes, all that time, posted already by me on his own forum page in my thread. And I told him that his simple calculation did not express the
described by all witnesses, reffing up of the jet engines to full power somewhere just before it crossed Route 27 in front of the Pentagon west wall.
And the change in direction described by the ANC witnesses and Sean Boger the Helipad controller. And the slight right bank and the slight left bank
described by many Route 27 witnesses.
So you have to use much more complicated calculations, which I was writing down and trying to get shown in their forum software for them during three
weeks, when suddenly while I was online, my whole 89 MB Wordpad window emptied under my eyes. And my backup didn't work anymore. I know from other
forums I was involved with behind the scenes, that the admins can intrude the boxes from members they distrust or see as trouble makers, since every
member opens up a connection to the forum software, and with the right hacker skills, they can get into their box, while they stay invisible to the
eyes of the owner of that box.
I can't prove it, but I was left over with a very sour taste in my mind.
So I took off a few days, and then decided to give them the link to the lectures from that US aviation professor, where anybody can construct their
own calculations involving a plane that makes so many different moves, before it impacts.
Balsamo just simply declared that it must have flown at constant speed in a constant arc, which is simply said, ridiculously simplified aviation
Why? Because that seems the only math he is able to master, while in fact you need a much higher level of math to describe the more complicated flight
path that Flight 77 flew up till impact. It flew over the Y-shaped antenna on the center of the Navy Annex its 8th building roof, in a slight downward
arc towards the space between the ANC buildings and the CITGO gas station, in-between it changed that arc slightly to the right, reffed up its jet
engines just before it crossed over the light poles beside Route 27 without touching them, and continued in a very slight left wing down arc to the
impact point on the first floor concrete slab of the west wall, making an imprint where the round cabin fuselage fitted perfectly in, and left two
huge destructive openings where its engines hit all the just newly reinforced concrete, panzer-windows and the steel beams and Kevlar netting embedded
in that concrete and brick wall.