It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by misfitofscience
Thank god for the eastern (Ontario) Canada. No earthquakes here! ELENIN AWAY!!!
Originally posted by Gradius Maximus
reply to post by Skorpiogurl
Thanks for breaking it down,
Can you explain to me as I asked earlier, why some think alignments have anything to do with increased effects?
Is it reasonable to assume Elenin is close to your projected mass?
In the UVS worldview, the tidal force of a Solar System object can exert torque-induced precession on Earth and this would transfer as a torque-free precession effect to vortically interact with viscous matter on Earth. Besides Moon and then Sun would exert the most significant tidal forces on Earth, the other planets with substantial tidal force list in an order of strength at their nearest encounter with Earth are Venus, Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The vortical culminated momentum on viscous matter of Earth transferred from tidal force of a planet is therefore not miniscule.
The straight-line alignment of several substantial planets would absolutely have a greater combined precession effect on viscous matter on Earth. It would render interplanetary torque-induced precession on Earth to cause torque-free precession in viscous matter to spawn unisonal vortex on Earth, it thus could significantly affect climate.
Taking the length of the projection of the tail as one minute of arc, and solving the triangle, we see the actual length of the tail has already exceeded 900,000 km! Although, in fact, the tail has to be still bigger, as Gustavo used a 30-cm telescope, knowing that if he had photographed the comet with a two-meter telescope, we would have seen fainter fragments of the comet’s tail.
National / World News 3:41 p.m. Thursday, July 7, 2011
5.6 quake rattles Japan near Fukushima site
The Associated Press NEW YORK — An earthquake registering 5.6 shook the Pacific off Honshu, Japan, the U.S. Geological Survey said Thursday. That is the area of northeast Japan ravaged by a March 11 quake and tsunami that knocked out power at the Fukushima nuclear plant.
Originally posted by phantomjack
I believe the mistake had already been pointed out, and that a new image was posted to make the correction.
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
reply to post by MACchine
as if the pressure is building before the alignment and then there is a certain BREAK or TIPPING POINT it where the pressure builds up to much and is realest before the alignment? but that could just be luck that the places building up pressure gave in before the alignment due to the extra tension