It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HarmonicNights
reply to post by Dr Expired
I think a child should be considered an entire seperate entity from the mother from the time of conception.
I'm confused, you think you have joint property, which is the same as ownership during sex? Uhhh, no, we the female allow you the male to visit the womb have sex, then you leave, lol there is never a joint ownership ever. I'm no feminist ,intact personally I believe feminist harm family life, but what is on or in my body is my choice.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Originally posted by Pilot
No. Never.
Should a man's penis be considered joint property?
edit on 24-6-2011 by Pilot because: edit to reply to op
Slightly off topic but in a way it is joint property during intercourse and that is perhaps the point of this thread.
Originally posted by Pilot
No. Never.
Should a man's penis be considered joint property?
edit on 24-6-2011 by Pilot because: edit to reply to op
Originally posted by Lynda101
I can't get my head around a man thinking he can temporarily 'share' a womb without the woman's consent.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Lynda101
I can't get my head around a man thinking he can temporarily 'share' a womb without the woman's consent.
She did give consent.
That's how the zygote was created in the first place.
Duh!
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The OP is correct.
Both DNA contributors have equal rights over any unique DNA code they created together from the moment that a zygote forms.
Most people don't realize this basic fact because they have been brainwashed by garbage information and they fail to question themselves and their faulty beliefs deeply. Also when they are told basic science and liberty fact, they will ignore it and continue believing their authoritarian one-way street bull.
They will express deep cognitive dissonance when you try to call them out on it. Instead of changing their point of view, they will express totally illogical and irrational ideas to back up their claims.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The OP is correct.
Both DNA contributors have equal rights over any unique DNA code they created together from the moment that a zygote forms.
Most people don't realize this basic fact because they have been brainwashed by garbage information and they fail to question themselves and their faulty beliefs deeply. Also when they are told basic science and liberty fact, they will ignore it and continue believing their authoritarian one-way street bull.
They will express deep cognitive dissonance when you try to call them out on it. Instead of changing their point of view, they will express totally illogical and irrational ideas to back up their claims.
Totally. The fact that the woman has to, you know, carry it for nine months and then do the majority of care for it for the next few years in no way means she has the right to make decisions that directly impact her body and health and well being.
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by Starwise
The fetus would not exist if it were not for both parents. Both parents create the child and both parents should have a say in if the child is born. Equality is such a pain sometimes isn't it?
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by Starwise
The fetus would not exist if it were not for both parents. Both parents create the child and both parents should have a say in if the child is born. Equality is such a pain sometimes isn't it?
Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by Starwise
The fetus would not exist if it were not for both parents. Both parents create the child and both parents should have a say in if the child is born. Equality is such a pain sometimes isn't it?