It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jepic
Nope. You could just state: "This law does not apply to rapes."
Case closed. What the OP proposes would only apply to normal relationships.
Originally posted by Adyta
Originally posted by queenofsheba
No. A woman's body is just that, hers. You think it's easy to be pregnant for nine months to support life? Without that woman, womb; you would have no life.
Do you think it's easy to live with a hormonal pregnant woman for 9 months?
Women aren't the only ones going through the pain of pregnancy.
Originally posted by queenofsheba
And without a woman's womb, you for sure have no life. Women are the givers of life.
How about this, if you decide to have sex with a woman you're taking the risk that A.) She might get pregnant and B.) That she might get pregnant and decide to abort the baby. Maybe you, I don't know, shouldn't be screwing someone who's not on the same page as you?
Fact is, if you're choosing to copulate with a separate being, you're dealing with a human who's actions (like it or not) are outside of your control. The law isn't going to do squat for me if my girl decides to find a way to terminate the pregnancy outside of what's legal, or even takes her own life because she's not emotionally stable enough to handle it.
Yeah because I said 'all men are rapists' right?
I'm talking about the consequences of giving men rights over a woman's decisions
but I'll relinquish the hypothetical and focus purely on consensual relations.
How about this, if you decide to have sex with a woman you're taking the risk that A.) She might get pregnant and B.) That she might get pregnant and decide to abort the baby. Maybe you, I don't know, shouldn't be screwing someone who's not on the same page as you?
Fact is, if you're choosing to copulate with a separate being, you're dealing with a human who's actions (like it or not) are outside of your control.
The law isn't going to do squat for me if my girl decides to find a way to terminate the pregnancy outside of what's legal
or even takes her own life because she's not emotional stable enough to handle it.
That's not to say I'm opposed to entertaining the idea of requiring a HUSBAND'S consent for his wife to abort a child, provided that a legal agreement is made prior to marriage
Originally posted by pikypiky
Should A Womans Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy? Yeppers.
When the intent is done out of reciprocated love and the potential to make said babies arises from the such acts of making love, the womb is shared property during pregnancy.
When the intent to have sex is forced against the will of the woman, then the womb is desecrated and the woman has to choice to remove unwanted life form from her womb.edit on 2011-6-24 by pikypiky because: To correct for "proper" grammar and spelling.
If that is a "shared womb"
Is that womb his property and his alone
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba
If that is a "shared womb"
Is that womb his property and his alone
I don't think that you quite understand the concept of "Share"
Exactly, if that is a "shared womb." The only ones I ever shared my womb with were my babies who grew in it, who were brought to life in it. Those babies are the only ones I ever "shared" my womb with. Certainly not my husband.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba
Exactly, if that is a "shared womb." The only ones I ever shared my womb with were my babies who grew in it, who were brought to life in it. Those babies are the only ones I ever "shared" my womb with. Certainly not my husband.
Cute.
You're not trying to avoid my rebuttal, are you?
Not trying to avoid your rebuttal at all. I can honestly say I've never shared my womb with anyone other than my three children who grew in it. Who else would want to share it with me? See, it's a physical thing. It's within me, a part of me. Does my husband share my lungs, my heart, my brain? Or is that his property as well?
My answer to, "Should a Woman's Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?" is an emphatic and resounding No.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba
My answer to, "Should a Woman's Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?" is an emphatic and resounding No.
So you agree that a man's wallet and earnings do not belong to the woman that bears his child, but to him only?
You clearly want to fight about this
What does your wallet have to do with my opinion?