Should A Womans Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 11:35 PM by milkyway12
reply to post by nithaiah



Then women should agree to this.


If you dont want men to have a LEGAL say into your abortion rights.

Then men should not have to pay child support.

If you get to choose whether or not to have the baby. Then the men get to choose whether or not to have the baby by giving up Parental Rights without the consent of the mother.

If you agree men have a LEGAL say into your abortion rights , then men should have to pay child support. If you kill the baby without the consent of the Farther , thats murder.


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 11:40 PM by Jepic
reply to post by Boreas





How about this, if you decide to have sex with a woman you're taking the risk that A.) She might get pregnant and B.) That she might get pregnant and decide to abort the baby. Maybe you, I don't know, shouldn't be screwing someone who's not on the same page as you?

Fact is, if you're choosing to copulate with a separate being, you're dealing with a human who's actions (like it or not) are outside of your control. The law isn't going to do squat for me if my girl decides to find a way to terminate the pregnancy outside of what's legal, or even takes her own life because she's not emotionally stable enough to handle it.


No. See that's not how it works. The man isn't choosing to decide to have sex with a woman. Both man AND woman are choosing to have sex with each other. Otherwise it would be rape.

So since both woman and man decided to have sex with each other, in case she gets pregnant any decision regarding the baby should falls into the hands of both the man and the woman, since it is SHARED PROPERTY.

WOW! It's amazing how much sense that makes.

RIGHT?


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 11:40 PM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Boreas



Yeah because I said 'all men are rapists' right?


You are certainly implying it.

I'm talking about the consequences of giving men rights over a woman's decisions


No, you are trying to muddy the issue by shouting RAPE.

but I'll relinquish the hypothetical and focus purely on consensual relations.


Excellent... we are now on the same page.

How about this, if you decide to have sex with a woman you're taking the risk that A.) She might get pregnant and B.) That she might get pregnant and decide to abort the baby. Maybe you, I don't know, shouldn't be screwing someone who's not on the same page as you?


Then why would a woman EVER have an abortion, if she's screwing someone that she doesn't want to have a child with?

Or, not using protection.... whatever.

The fact is, you are putting all choice in the matter onto the woman, and all responsibility for "HER" choice onto the man.

And that is not equality, that is slavery.

IT's HIS wallet, it's HIS labor, it's HIS money.... why should he have to pay HER money, because SHE made the decision to have a child?

Fact is, if you're choosing to copulate with a separate being, you're dealing with a human who's actions (like it or not) are outside of your control.


Exactly.... that's all I'm saying... if the woman is choosing to copulate with a man, she is choosing to copulate with someone who's actions are outside her control.

She has no control over whether or not his money goes to her for 18 years.

Right?

The law isn't going to do squat for me if my girl decides to find a way to terminate the pregnancy outside of what's legal


Yeah... but if she has a child that YOU don't want, then you are financially responsible for HER choice... is that fair?

IF the child belongs to the woman (which is what you are arguing) then SHE is financially responsible for it.

That is what I am saying.

or even takes her own life because she's not emotional stable enough to handle it.


WTF?

where did that come from?

That's not to say I'm opposed to entertaining the idea of requiring a HUSBAND'S consent for his wife to abort a child, provided that a legal agreement is made prior to marriage


You are missing the point of the double standard.

She can choose to keep or kill the child, he has no legal say in it.

But he must abide by her choice, whether that means losing a child he wanted, or paying for a child that he didn't want.

You seem to not understand the complimentary nature of Choice, and Responsibility FOR that choice.

IF it's a woman's choice, then it's HER responsibility.

IF it's a woman AND a man's choice, then it is BOTH their responsibility.


Do you see how Equality works?


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 11:48 PM by queenofsheba
reply to post by Adyta



Funny stuff from a comedian, to be sure. Everyone's experience in this life is unique and whether or not you choose to believe your life and the things you do in it are special or not, well that's a choice we all make. I always choose love and light and believe there is a purpose. When you look into your newborn's eyes for the first time you see....
edit on 24-6-2011 by queenofsheba because: spell



reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:11 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba



If that is a "shared womb"


Is that womb his property and his alone


I don't think that you quite understand the concept of "Share"



reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:15 AM by queenofsheba
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to
post by queenofsheba



If that is a "shared womb"


Is that womb his property and his alone


I don't think that you quite understand the concept of "Share"


The only ones I ever "shared" my womb with were my babies who grew in it, who were brought to life in it. Those babies are the only ones I ever "shared" my womb with. Certainly not my husband.
edit on 25-6-2011 by queenofsheba because: add line



reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:17 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba



Exactly, if that is a "shared womb." The only ones I ever shared my womb with were my babies who grew in it, who were brought to life in it. Those babies are the only ones I ever "shared" my womb with. Certainly not my husband.


Cute.

You're not trying to avoid my rebuttal, are you?


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:20 AM by queenofsheba
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to
post by queenofsheba



Exactly, if that is a "shared womb." The only ones I ever shared my womb with were my babies who grew in it, who were brought to life in it. Those babies are the only ones I ever "shared" my womb with. Certainly not my husband.


Cute.

You're not trying to avoid my rebuttal, are you?


Not trying to avoid your rebuttal at all. I can honestly say I've never shared my womb with anyone other than my three children who grew in it. Who else would want to share it with me? See, it's a physical thing. It's within me, a part of me. Does my husband share my lungs, my heart, my brain? Or is that his property as well?


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:23 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba



Not trying to avoid your rebuttal at all. I can honestly say I've never shared my womb with anyone other than my three children who grew in it. Who else would want to share it with me? See, it's a physical thing. It's within me, a part of me. Does my husband share my lungs, my heart, my brain? Or is that his property as well?


The topic, if I can recall correctly, was whether or not the man has a say in abortion.

/me checks thread title

Yup.

And you already know this too... so stop playing dumb.


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:29 AM by queenofsheba
reply to post by ErtaiNaGia



My answer to, "Should a Woman's Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?" is an emphatic and resounding No.


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:31 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba



My answer to, "Should a Woman's Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?" is an emphatic and resounding No.


So you agree that a man's wallet and earnings do not belong to the woman that bears his child, but to him only?


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:34 AM by queenofsheba
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to
post by queenofsheba



My answer to, "Should a Woman's Womb Be Considered Shared Property During Pregnancy?" is an emphatic and resounding No.


So you agree that a man's wallet and earnings do not belong to the woman that bears his child, but to him only?


Oh my....you are going way off topic here. You clearly want to fight about this and sorry, I'm not your girl to fight with. What does your wallet have to do with my opinion? Nothing. So, Happy Friday to you and hopefully you have a great weekend, as I sure will.


reply posted on 25-6-2011 @ 12:37 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by queenofsheba



You clearly want to fight about this


It's just a question.

What does your wallet have to do with my opinion?


IT has to do with Choice, and Who is legally obligated to take responsibility for that choice.

If the Child in your womb (which is REALLY what we are talking about, not the womb) belongs to the woman ALONE, then she has the obligation of taking SOLE responsibility for it.

You can't claim that the Child belongs to YOU, and then state that the Child is HIS responsibility.

Because that is slavery.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Attention ATS, This Is Important
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Labor Day Has Been Canceled
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
Nine Myths About \'Socialism\' In The United States.
  Posted 7 days ago with 20 member flags
Asking for help around here......
  Posted 16 days ago with 19 member flags
Are You All Deranged?! Women Want Rape? o_O
  Posted 19 days ago with 15 member flags
I am tired.
  Posted 11 days ago with 12 member flags
Namaste = pretentious
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Gays have the right to marry and always have
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags