It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof Of Photoshopped 9/11 Memorial Photographs.

page: 1
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Were 9/11 Victims families so bereft of loved ones photographs, that submitting obviously
tampered with pictorial tributes to memorial sites was their only recourse?



This is a post by simonshack The Hug-Me Clones taken from this thread 9/11 Memorial Scams on The Septemberclues Forums




THE HUG-ME CLONES

Hug me! It makes me so much realer!


































You MUST ask yourself this simple question: Why are so many photos of "9/11 victims"
so blatantly photoshopped?
If you don't ask yourself that question, I won't apologize for saying that you are in total denial.
Not a good thing to be in.


Oh well, perhaps you just discovered this research today and wonder what it is all about.
In that case, please check out this page of the September Clues website: Vicsims Report


The above are just a few of the many, many anomalies with the 9/11 victims photographs,
families and personal histories.
This information was presented more than two years ago and still so very few people
question the existences and validities of the 9/11 victims. Why is this aspect still taboo?
If most of the 9/11 charade was a hoax, why not all of it?
It makes the most logistical sense.
Were most of the alleged victims, in fact, computer generated entities, with no earthly existences?
There is a vast amount of evidence that indicates that this may indeed be the case,
and that the real number of deaths was far, far fewer than is advertised.

Isn't it about time we began to take this aspect seriously?
Think of the some of the levels of possible fraud, from the compensation funds to the charity
organisations. The implications are pretty sizable!




posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:21 PM
link   
I knew victims of 9/11... this is pure stupidity. American lives were lost, regardless of "whodunit?"



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:21 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:26 PM
link   
A few of these photos are not photoshopped, and are actually 2 separate pics where they seem to be in the exact same pose.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:27 PM
link   
Wow just when I thought I heard everything, now people believe the victims aren't even real?! Will the madness ever stop guys?



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Plus if anything it looks like the photos with the arms around the people are real photos ,and the ones without the arms around the people are photo shopped simply to define the lost victim in the picture.....Doesn't prove any cover up at all.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Simon Shack is defiantly the Slimiest Truther alive. Thats quiet an accomplishment.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   
LOL. This isn't going to sit well with most people...

You say the casualties are "much lower" but 3,000 deaths sounds reasonable for just the World Trade Centers, alone, on a typical work day. So unless you can prove that the buildings were abandoned at the time they were hit, your claims are pretty absurd.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by pshea38
 


Egads. This is the kind of stuff that makes me believe in dis-info campaigns. Way to present the lamest, most bat feces silly strawman argument. The better to weaken the entire Truth Movement with, I suppose.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by pshea38
If most of the 9/11 charade was a hoax, why not all of it?

Because it's easier to hide lies amongst truths. That way when anyone argues the lies, they are also are arguing the truths (are therefore must be wrong!).



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by EmVeeFF
I knew victims of 9/11... this is pure stupidity. American lives were lost, regardless of "whodunit?"


In the rats nest, that is 9/11 it would be fond to take anyone word for anything.
If you would care to supply names for investigative purposes, that would be great.

Would you care to comment on the picture anomalies at all?



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Wow just when I thought I heard everything, now people believe the victims aren't even real?! Will the madness ever stop guys?


The only madness is that people still insist on blindly believing PROVEN LIARS without the least
investigation into actual evidence.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 03:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Plus if anything it looks like the photos with the arms around the people are real photos ,and the ones without the arms around the people are photo shopped simply to define the lost victim in the picture.....Doesn't prove any cover up at all.


Well, explain this then.




Same pose, same inclination. It is the same image of
the subject, superimposed over at least one background.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by waypastvne
Simon Shack is defiantly the Slimiest Truther alive. Thats quiet an accomplishment.



And you sir, are a Liar.
No accomplishment at all.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   
Think about it, how many people do you know that have nice, acceptable photos of themselves that could be used in this sort of way, all thats been done is remove others from the pictures to make them fit the happy head shot style photos.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by pshea38
 


Just a cursory glance and you can tell they are not at all the same pic. Same guy, almost same hair and smile, but different. I look a lot alike in many pics.

CJ



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by BirdOfillOmen
LOL. This isn't going to sit well with most people...

You say the casualties are "much lower" but 3,000 deaths sounds reasonable for just the World Trade Centers, alone, on a typical work day. So unless you can prove that the buildings were abandoned at the time they were hit, your claims are pretty absurd.


People need to prove things to themselves.

I gave a few links in the OP but there is plenty of evidence to suggest
that the twin were empty at the time of demolition, if only one looks.
LetsRollForums.com and the Hollow Towers can educate us.

3000 deaths did sound reasonable for so long, but now it appears that
the actual count was much closer to the zero side of the number line.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 04:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by RobertAntonWeishaupt
reply to post by pshea38
 


Egads. This is the kind of stuff that makes me believe in dis-info campaigns. Way to present the lamest, most bat feces silly strawman argument. The better to weaken the entire Truth Movement with, I suppose.


Truth movement my arse.
This is their Must-Stay-Away-From area.
Not because of logic and evidence, but because of Direct Orders.

Thanks for dropping by.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by moonrunner
Think about it, how many people do you know that have nice, acceptable photos of themselves that could be used in this sort of way, all thats been done is remove others from the pictures to make them fit the happy head shot style photos.


Well, the above photos are merely the tip of the iceberg.
The links provided will only further stir up scepticism as
to the plausability of the whole fiction presented to us, regarding
this crucial aspect to the hoax.



posted on Jun, 17 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by pshea38
 


Just a cursory glance and you can tell they are not at all the same pic. Same guy, almost same hair and smile, but different. I look a lot alike in many pics.

CJ


Could all the above photographs be computer generated manipulations.
Was it really beyond the realms of possibility and technology?



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join