It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
I don't get the logic here. even when I disagree with a 9/11 argument, I can see it's relevance in establishing a part of a theory or explanation.
it is absolutley indisputable the jets crashed into the towers around 9:00 am on a Tuesday. It is also indisputable that the towers came down soon after.
It is indisputable that many human remains were found, and returned to loved ones.
So what is the point here ? Are you making the argument that the towers were empty at 9:00 am or that everyone got out ?
How the heck did anyone survive who was trapped ABOVE where the jets hit ?
on the first anniversary of the attacks, I heard first person accounts from people that were there that day. people that were in the building !!!!
they told me about the sounds of bodies hitting the courtyard after jumping out of windows. people cut in half. firefighters running UP the stairs
are you really making the case that a few pics that were altered to remove non-victims from a victims photo so that photo could appear in a memorial is proof they never existed ?
what is the point of that specifically, and who benefits from it, and how was it done ( not the pics, the whole enchilada, birth certifictaes, school records, medical records, etc) ?
I think this is all about some twisted competition to see who can come up with the strangest idea or just simple trolling
prove me wrongedit on 18-6-2011 by syrinx high priest because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by pshea38
I think there is an old Styx song called "Too Much Time on My Hands"...this is really weird...why? why? would this be done?
CJ
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by pshea38
I will not continue this discussion with someone who makes ignorant claims like the towers were emptied ahead of time. my sources are direct first hand eye witnesses who were in the building on that fateful day
shame on you for dragging thier names through the mud to try to make an obscure point on a message board
I hope nobody in your family is ever fictitiously killed
and I'm not clicking on any links you provide, god knows what my PC will catch
I'm not going to stick aorund for the vetted names, we both know there aren't any
edit on 18-6-2011 by syrinx high priest because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by pshea38
You yourself should go through the images. You're just posting lies that someone made up. Look at the details yourself. This should go to the hoax bin.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Oh let's quickly verify these new ones you claim to be the same:
Brad's picture: Different highlights and shadows. Eyebrows. Different smile. Different hair.
Dark haired lady in 3 pics: Highlights and shadows. Different angle. Hair. Eyes.
Also flipping an image is nothing. Fixing image because it has errors on it is nothing.
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Oh let's quickly verify these new ones you claim to be the same:
Brad's picture: Different highlights and shadows. Eyebrows. Different smile. Different hair.
Dark haired lady in 3 pics: Highlights and shadows. Different angle. Hair. Eyes.
Also flipping an image is nothing. Fixing image because it has errors on it is nothing.
Ok. I think you are missing the point. All variations are down to photoshop touch-ups
and unimaginative slight variations/digital manipulations.
Would you not even consider that all these memorial photographs peculiarities could
be the result of fakery processes. Doing this may motivate you to delve deeper.
The photographic examples given are just the tip of the iceberg
when it comes to evidence of victim fakery. See links.
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by pshea38
You yourself should go through the images. You're just posting lies that someone made up. Look at the details yourself. This should go to the hoax bin.
All the evidence is verifiable. You are the one posting lies.
9/11 was a hoax. Fakery aspects of the con are most certainly real.
Originally posted by pshea38
Were 9/11 Victims families so bereft of loved ones photographs, that submitting obviously
tampered with pictorial tributes to memorial sites was their only recourse?
This is a post by simonshack The Hug-Me Clones taken from this thread 9/11 Memorial Scams on The Septemberclues Forums
The above are just a few of the many, many anomalies with the 9/11 victims photographs,
families and personal histories.
This information was presented more than two years ago and still so very few people
question the existences and validities of the 9/11 victims. Why is this aspect still taboo?
If most of the 9/11 charade was a hoax, why not all of it?
It makes the most logistical sense.
Were most of the alleged victims, in fact, computer generated entities, with no earthly existences?
There is a vast amount of evidence that indicates that this may indeed be the case,
and that the real number of deaths was far, far fewer than is advertised.
Isn't it about time we began to take this aspect seriously?
Think of the some of the levels of possible fraud, from the compensation funds to the charity
organisations. The implications are pretty sizable!
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Yeah except that those link you posted dont provide any evidence to suggest such. Only misinfo. So can you point to any actual evidence?