posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 05:27 PM
reply to post by sunqueen30
I dont know. I think Jesse Ventura is at least partially sincere in his beliefs. I think Whats his name was bullying him. Jesse is no dummy, but he
is a direct, blunt, honest sort of guy, and people like the dude who was interviewing him are more psychologically astute. I DO have worries about a
Jesse Ventura presidency, because it does beg the question, why is the MSM giving him a venue with which to make a good run?
BUT, I think in part that is because he would be easy to discredit as a "nut" much like Brit boy was doing. I dont think they see him as a threat
to really become president, but merely a wedge with which to divide the disenchanted masses and prevent them from forming a majority voting block for
some non-corporate candidate.
I was initially VERY suspicious of Jesse Ventura being a double agent so to speak. But I took the time to look up his voting record, and I have to
say, he is consistent. It does lend him credibility. I dont know that I would vote for him. He may be too forthright and not Machiavellian to make
it as President, but I do tend to lean towards him being sincere for the most part.
Not every conspiracy theorist believes all theories equally. I certainly dont believe every single theory going. I dont think the fact that he said
it was entertainment in that context, is really the smoking gun you want it to be.