It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kroms33
Originally posted by Skellon
reply to post by SyphonX
So, a member states that 'they' are now discussing troops on the ground, I ask for proof of this and then you condescend me with something that hasn't happened. (speculation)
Technically, they already have troops on the ground - who do you think is pointing the laser devices at the targets for the bombing runs (painting targets)?
I've been trying to find a source for this speculation on Ground Troops.
A multi-national force has launched a series of strikes against Muammar Gaddafi's forces in Libya. Gaddafi responded by attacking the city of Benghazi. As a result of the military actions, reportedly 48 were killed and 150 injured.
Libyan state TV channel Al Jamahiriya reported that the Western coalition has conducted several air strikes on the Libyan capital, Tripoli, on Sunday morning.
Libyan officials also claim that during Saturday’s attack, Western missiles hit civilian targets, among them a hospital in Tripoli and a fuel storage depot in Misurata.
Enough of this C R A P Right Winger war monger
dont make me laugh at your post your really clueless.
btw your country Australia has tons of corruption why no uprising eh?
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
same thing in Libya the only interest they have is OIL.
How do you know this for sure? Gut feeling eh? Show your proof! Hmmmmm
This is being done to free the Libyan people from a terrible terrorist dictator who has instilled fear in the masses for way too long. Now Egypt and other nations have broken the seal the people are finally feeling confident enough to stand up to this tyrant! Freedom for the Libyan people!
Oil! That is really paranoid!
Speaking of civilians....
Do we know how many of them are dead yet, because of this UN humanitarian mission?
I am curious.
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by kroms33
You can quote the facts and figures but where is your proof other than useless facts and gut feelings? If it's about oil only prove it beyond all doubt. Until then it's a humanitarian effort and paranoid to think otherwise!
Not a good thing to alter somebodies post in your reply to stress a point. Downright cowardly and rude really!edit on 20-3-2011 by phatpackage because: (no reason given)