reply to post by PuterMan
Ok, Putterman. Thank's for starting this thread.
Lets start with some background first.
It was the US Navy who were responsible for Project “Prime Argus” - a precursor program to HAARP. Argus was responsible for exploding three
atomic bombs in the Van Allen belts and, thereafter monitoring the resultant effects. Researchers who have recently investigated the son of Argus,
project HAARP, maintain this is an advanced weapon system capable of acting as an impenetrable planetary-wide missile shield.
Behind the construction of HAARP lay the scientific patents of Bernard J. Eastlund. Previously classified as Secret, Eastlund’s patents are now
partly available for inspection. They are revealing for the sheer scope of what the HAARP project may be capable of, including “weather
modification.” Eastlund had in fact used much of Tesla’s work to arrive at his concepts, a fact he openly acknowledged. Moreover, the original
Prime Argus project was also concerned with looking “at ways to cause earthquakes.”
As we know, the HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and they themselves are saying that HAARP system could:
* give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option through
at least 1986);
* replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact
* be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP with a more flexible and accurate
* provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working;
* provide a wide-area Earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible
to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements;
* be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area;
* be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.
This claimed capabilities we should be able to agree upon.
But even so the above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national defense, and to those concerned about cost-cutting.
However, the possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be found in Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency
records, are alarming. Moreover, effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield -- the ionosphere -- could be cataclysmic
according to some scientists.
Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent # 4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere; and/or
Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.
The patent said:
"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the
power injection level particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by
the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes... "
"...it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a
communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's
communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time."
"... large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces
with resultant destruction."
is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric
particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.
"... molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the
molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen,
etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased."
So, are then the following things left to disagree about?
H.A.R.P Weather Modification.
edit on 15/2/2011 by Roald because: (no reason given)