It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by James1982
Some people seem to believe there is radiation in cell phones? www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
If you don't like the alternatives, invent a better light bulb
Originally posted by autopat51
i have been using cfl bulbs for years with no ill effect. i bought the 100 watt bulbs ( uses the energy of a 40 watt incand.) very bright!! my energy bill went down by a lot!!! none have broken and none have burnt out yet. no cancer, no headaches and im not worried.
my energy bill went down by a lot!!!
very bright!
no headaches and im not worried
Originally posted by buddha
Put a leaflet up at all the stores that sell Fluorescent Light.
about how dangerous the are and the clean up.
if ever one call the government to come
and take the bulb away ever time one brakes.
they will get sick of it,
we have markets and back road shops who still sell them
and all ways will.
Special handling instructions for breakage are currently not printed on the packaging of household CFL bulbs in many countries. The amount of mercury released by one bulb can temporarily exceed U.S. federal guidelines for chronic exposure.[55][56] Chronic however, implies that the exposure continues constantly over a long period of time and the Maine DEP study noted that it remains unclear what the health risks are from short-term exposure to low levels of elemental mercury. The Maine DEP study also confirmed that, despite following EPA best-practice cleanup guidelines on broken CFLs, researchers were unable to remove mercury from carpet, and agitation of the carpet—such as by young children playing—created spikes as high as 25,000 ng/m3 in air close to the carpet, even weeks after the initial breakage. Conventional tubular fluorescent lamps have been in commercial and domestic use since the 1930s with little public concern about their handling; these and other domestic products such as the mercury-in-glass thermometer (now banned by many countries for medical use) contain far more mercury than modern CFLs.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Originally posted by autopat51
i have been using cfl bulbs for years with no ill effect. i bought the 100 watt bulbs ( uses the energy of a 40 watt incand.) very bright!! my energy bill went down by a lot!!! none have broken and none have burnt out yet. no cancer, no headaches and im not worried.
Thats a very typical response from someone whose very Pro CFL Bulb Supporter.
my energy bill went down by a lot!!!
I have seen such claims before with no proof given by the media what so ever
very bright!
Thats the problem with these light bulbs they are very bright and alot of people can and will have eye problems later on, sure you wont have the effects right now, but you will experience the problems like i had my deal with these ugly light bulbs.
no headaches and im not worried
Very funny statement, have you noticed your eye in the white area are becoming red? again, you wont feel right away with the symptoms, i felt the symptoms right after the second year of usage, once i came back to the old light bulbs, i felt much better.
I felt almost blind with the CFLs light bulbs
You know its funny, if smoking is bad for the environment and for your health why haven't the government banned the Tobacco?
Its quite simple really.edit on 4-2-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by James1982
Yes and no. I really did have to read and think about it hard but got tired of rereading and thinking and decided to post that anyway just in case
Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by badgerprints
Right, because burning 2/3 more electricity has no bad effects.
I think I will trust tesla over Edison thank you
Just like how I trust a sterling engine over combustion
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by badgerprints
No. Incandescent uses more energy. These fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) are vastly improved over the ones we've all be living with for decades. In addition, it looks like LEDs will probably take over the market anyway. Much ado about nothing.
I personally have not had any red eyes, headaches, or blindness. I've been using them almost exclusively for years and years now. If you have, and it's actually from CFLs that's unfortunate (and odd) but the simple solution would be to not use them. That's where the real issue is, in my opinion, is that it's not the government's role to control what light bulbs one uses. I think we can all agree on that. One thought on the red eyes, were you smoking anything?
One thought on the red eyes, were you smoking anything?