It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
However, everyone is stuck in a fantasy. They think the "President" still has power. He doesn't. He never did actually, that's the trick we have been fooled by.
All the President can do, is sit in a bunker and use his telephone and TV cameras to blab with his mouth. He has no real power at all.
We are all brainwashed into thinking that these "positions of power" actually exist. But they do not exist, they are mere illusions.
Originally posted by beansanmash
You are correct in your thinking, however, those thoughts only apply to a democratic leader.
The power of non-democratic leaders differ from democratic leaders. A democratic leader derives his power through the consent of the governed, while a non-democratic leader derives his power from his control of the governed.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The Egyptian protesters are wrong actually. Here allow me to explain exactly why.
Within a few days of the protests growing larger, the "people" overwhelmed the police, and the physical actual government dissolved quickly.
Originally posted by Passafist
Just wanted to say, just because you don't believe in government doesn't mean you believe in Anarchy completely. IMO this would work well as long as people look at their government as INDIVIDUALS and not a collective breathing monster.
Originally posted by LightofLiberty
reply to post by muzzleflash
Umm, maybe I should tell you that he has power over the military and police, and political institutions of Egypt. That is power. If he didn't have power, how could he have become President? Most definitely he has power...but not for long.
Originally posted by arbitrarygeneraiist
reply to post by muzzleflash
The problem with saying that everything is a mere illusion, as I personally do think most things to be, is that there still needs to be some sort of semblance of law and order amid the chaos. Otherwise why should people obey laws, take orders, live a "good" life, etc?
Originally posted by gunner50cal
reply to post by muzzleflash
Thier cost of living is no delusion, Their cost of gas and their government suppresion is no delusion . i can sorta see where youre comin from but they have finally woken up and have grown a huge set of cahunas to do this . If thats what it took to get out of their dilusion then more power to them!
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Civilized:
...
1. Having a highly developed society and culture.
2. Showing evidence of moral and intellectual advancement; humane, ethical, and reasonable:
Originally posted by LethalMouse
1- Is really big and can personally whoop everyones ass under them. (doesnt need followers)
(obviously this doesnt work on a grand scale)
2- Personally has a nuke, death ray, or god knows what mass death weapon in his enclosed palace and is crazy enough to blow everyone to smitherines unless they do what he says. (think Lex Luther minus Superman)
However, everyone is stuck in a fantasy. They think the "President" still has power. He doesn't. He never did actually, that's the trick we have been fooled by.
All the President can do, is sit in a bunker and use his telephone and TV cameras to blab with his mouth. He has no real power at all.
We are all brainwashed into thinking that these "positions of power" actually exist. But they do not exist, they are mere illusions.
Originally posted by axeman007
You are valid in thinking your opinion may matter, however, in the big picture you could no be more wrong. This is not an attack on you in any way shape or form, but the argument you propose is naive. Mubaraek has ruled, peacefully and successfully for 30 years, and the public is revolting only in hopes of more freedoms due to Tunisia's success. Of course every society has the right to protest their own government, and God bless the Egyptian people, but I lost all respect for this entire affair today, when it turned violent. I have been there, Egypt, many times, and know what a tolerant and peaceful society it is, and am disgusted it has come to this. God bless the Egyptian people.
Originally posted by LethalMouse
BUT, the 5% is really only viable for comic book mad scientists or someone in a very small place with a small poppulace.
Two times when one "leader" has real power:
1- Is really big and can personally whoop everyones ass under them. (doesnt need followers)
(obviously this doesnt work on a grand scale)
2- Personally has a nuke, death ray, or god knows what mass death weapon in his enclosed palace and is crazy enough to blow everyone to smitherines unless they do what he says. (think Lex Luther minus Superman)
Originally posted by Sound.Voice.Productions
If this were true, it would mean that we are alone, we are one and our actions do not effect others and neither do the actions of others effect us.
The real truth is: We are responsible for our own actions 100% and we are responsible for the actions taken by others as we live among others and there is such a thing as cause & effect.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The Egyptian protesters are wrong actually. Here allow me to explain exactly why.
Within a few days of the protests growing larger, the "people" overwhelmed the police, and the physical actual government dissolved quickly.
And the rest of your opinion can be ignored because you have missed the point.
The president dissolved his government without realising he is a figurehead that needs to go, the peopel are protesting his very existence. If he stepped down and opened the elections then the protests would quickly stop. Your opinion seems to miss this point which i find odd.
Whether you have this view of higher powers or not, the peope are complaining about the person in power, the top person, the figurehead of an organisation and it is that person, along with the rest of the government he supported that needs to go to restore peace.