It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by arbitrarygeneraiist
Yeah but there would be boners and stiff nipples all over the place, and no one would know what boner is responding to who etc right? So everyone would all be like WTF, and everyone would be uncomfortable lol. Another thing I thought of, imagine how much money will be saved on the water bill! Everyone would be lets wash up, get in and get out of this insanity, at least until they get used to it.
When you serve in the military your minute religious values are irrelevant. You follow orders, and that's that.
Originally posted by EssenSieMich
How about this - we only let the great looking, well educated, and fun to be around gays and lesbians into the military! Better yet we could do that with immigration too! Pigs to the left, Hotties to the right - BOO YAH!
Originally posted by Annee
Straight men could feel flattered if they weren't insecure.
in·se·cure /ˌɪnsɪˈkyʊər/ Show Spelled
–adjective
1. subject to fears, doubts, etc.; not self-confident or assured: an insecure person.
2. not confident or certain; uneasy; anxious: He was insecure about the examination.
3. not secure; exposed or liable to risk, loss, or danger: an insecure stock portfolio.
4. not firmly or reliably placed or fastened: an insecure ladder
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Annee
The same could be said for females having to shower with males though. The females would be flattered if they weren't so insecure, so they should shower with males and get over their insecurity.
Originally posted by Xavialune
Originally posted by GsevenThis earth is a macrocosm of what happens within us on a biological level. If we indeed have foreign viruses, bacteria, parasites and microbes entering our bodies, killing, infiltrating, mutating and otherwise damaging healthy functions, then it's safe to say we have that equivalent in the physical world. We have anti-bodies within us....we have soldiers in the world. We have free radicals within us....we have radicals within the world. If you take the steps to kill viruses, parasites, cancers, and bacteria within your own body, then you most certainly support war on a physical level, whether you believe it or not. There is no way to be passive with the idea of war and be passive with the health of your own body. The two do not coincide, and this is the biggest flaw in logic among anti-war liberals.
The question is, what does homosexuality represent within the individual microcosm, if creation is not being fostered by the homosexual unions? Furthermore, within the microcosm, if we are turning our anti-bodies into whatever "this" is, I'm of the feeling that it can't be good.
Philosophically speaking, that is.
Wait, what? Youre saying that because gays cant procreate, they are like a virus? Is that what youre saying? I really hope not.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Annee
Straight men could feel flattered if they weren't insecure.
Do you mean 1, 2, 3 or 4?
And this goes for everyone using this word repeatedly
Originally posted by Gseven
Obviously, you've never served, otherwise you wouldn't state that. On dog tags, we are directed to have our religion stated.
Originally posted by TKDRL
Originally posted by arbitrarygeneraiist
reply to post by Gseven
When you serve in the military your minute religious values are irrelevant. You follow orders, and that's that.
It is kind of off topic, but I never understood how one could be a catholic and christian, yet join the military. The military is the killing arm of a government, plain and simple. Anyone one that thinks otherwise is either naive or fooling themselves. How can one join the military, and reconcile that there very job is killing, against what they are supposed to believe is the word of god?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Annee
The same could be said for females having to shower with males though. The females would be flattered if they weren't so insecure, so they should shower with males and get over their insecurity.
But I'm all for co-ed showers and getting beyond all this nonsense.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Annee
The most reasonable solution I can think of: Everyone uses one huge shower room, but each shower head gets their own personal walls, like stalls in a bathroom. I guess the same thing would have to be implemented for sleeping as well, just to shut the super sensitive up. I don't think eating together in the mess hall without stalls would be problematic. Could be wrong though, don't want a gay to sneeze on you afterall!