It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Becoming
reply to post by sheepslayer247
". Who cares if it was written that way, he isn't Ron Burgundy, he wouldn't tell the people to F themselves if the prompter told him to would he?"
Ummmm-yeah I actually think he would.....
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by CynicalM
Seems to me those at the WH think THEY have the right to give and take our rights,not the Creator.
Seems to me that the Constitution, not the Declaration OR any supernatural being is what established those rights. If they were established by a God wouldn't they be Universal? Why would man need to put something like the Constitution in place to preserve something given to us by a supernatural being? God didn't write the Constitution, man did.
As for Obama who knows why he left it out, maybe he, like many of us, sees how absurd it is in the 21st century to think that our rights came from some spooky invisible guy in the clouds.
Originally posted by pilgrim1938
because of the anti-american attitude of the president and his administration that correct quote was intentionally left out of the speech.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by FortAnthem
It looks like the part you are referring to was not part of his speech, but an off the cuff addition at the last minute. For those who are intrested, The text of the Presidents speech is usually provided to news outlets for anlaysis and so the media can discuss the issue before the event to draw more people in.
Here is the text of his speech from the video.
America.Gov - Obama addresses National Hispanic Caucus - 9/17/10
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
September 17, 2009
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT THE
CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE’S
32ND ANNUAL AWARD GALA
September 16, 2009
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Originally posted by justadood
Originally posted by pilgrim1938
because of the anti-american attitude of the president and his administration that correct quote was intentionally left out of the speech.
I'm sorry. The 'anti-American attitude'?
You base that on what? His choice in football teams? The way he combs his hair? Him not being an old white man?
what rights already exist naturally
This does not establish rights, but it REAFFIRMS their existence naturally.
More rights exist than are written in the Constitution -- would you have it be in complete control of our lives by putting to letter all rights?
We all have our creator, creators, Creator, nature, the Great Force, God, Jesus -
I found my next mission.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by witness63
BULLCRAP
the largest reason this country is so screwed right now is because of
social security
medicare
medicaid
food stamps
housing welfare ie fanny and freddy
corporate welfare
educational welfare
department of education
unions
regulations financial and banking
destroying the financial system that every american has had in the past to make themselves financially independent.
hell all those great "Accomplishments" of the "great democratic party"
how many trillions of dollars have you people spent for the betterment of americans and yeah take a good look at your handy work EVERY SINGLE thing you people have done have made more people broke more stupid and more people dependent and live in poverty.
since fdr you people every chance you people have gotten to screw more people over than you ever thought about helping.
please you leftists have done more harm than anyone ever could including islamic radicals.
edit on 19-9-2010 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Janky Red
They never actually cut back on the social programs, and several Presidents expanded them.
Hopefully the Fiscal Conservative movement takes hold and begins kicking Neo-Cons out of office.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Janky Red
That's actually true.. Reagan and the Neo-Conservative movement generally spend far more than typical Democrats.
The problem as to why that is, is that Republicans (at least those that get elected, but I'd bet a larger portion of the actual masses as well) are "Socialist" in nature. They never actually cut back on the social programs, and several Presidents expanded them. But the actual difference between Repubs and Dems, is that Repubs expand the Military Industrial Complex to extreme levels, and with it bring on a massive national debt. Be it for the sake of invading innocent countries or spending hundreds of billions "chasing one man in a cave" or just research.. Repubs will always spend more in general than Dems.
Hopefully the Fiscal Conservative movement takes hold and begins kicking Neo-Cons out of office.