posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 10:23 PM
just signed up to tag on to solarstorm's post that ALOT of reports state that the EBEs known as "Greys" wear a type of lense over the eyes. i'm
gonna lean towards real on this subject, for a few reasons. one being that from the perported story behind this footage, it's footage of an alien the
U.S. aquired in '89, during an interview session in about '96, toward the end of the sessions. this correlates with a report of a crash in the
kalahari desert in '89 in which at least two beings were supposedly recovered and were sent to different US installations, one being wright-patterson
AFB, and i believe groom lake was the destination for the other one.
furthermore as to the low quality, i've seen higher quality version version. secondly, lets assume that all the mainstream conspiracies are true.
the roswell crash, the majestic 12, etc. If you are hiding the existence of "EBEs" from the not only the bulk of your own countrymen, but from the
world, and ever since the 60's you've had "UFO 'nutters" camping outside your base at a black mailbox to watch for ufo's, digging up your
illegal road monitoring devices, and rallying for the release of information on the subject, why WOULD you record it clearly? i mean, since only the
people directly involved need to know, and new people on the projects can be breifed, everyone involved knows they're there, the only reason to
record it is for study by people involved for more information, who more then likely already know what it looks like. the footage doesn't need to be
crystal for them, as long as the general image is discernable and the audio is there(which it was before VICTOR removed it, according to his story).
so if it is leaked in any way, it served it's purpose to the project, and can be disregarded and "Debunked" by the public due to it's low quality
as for the EBE being a puppet, yes i will admit that alot of it's movement could be done with say, animatronics, but it moved certain ways that a few
people have said is uncharacteristic of puppetry, one person in the documentary said this, and a few of my friends are in the scifi movie business and
agree to that statement. i'll say two things on the movement:
1) i wasn't expecting to see the brow over the eye move, and it did, showing facial controls, which lead to statement...
2) assuming it was faked, my attitude on that is that whoever faked it is either a good hollywood anamotronics tech, or a REAL GOOD hollywood
puppeteer, or should be. and if they are, why are they wasting their talent on a 2 minute vid, when for the same amount of work time and equipment
costs, they could get paid quite a hefty sum by some fatcat director and production company?
of course someone will state a list equally as large or larger that outlines why they think it is a puppet/hoax/fake, but i'm not here to try and
persuade anyone, i just felt i should back up solarstorm's lenses comment and post my own arguments about the finer points of the tape.
it could be a hoax, but i lean towards Authentic.
[edit on 8-11-2006 by Harutomo]