First of all, Bob Lazar is a real fake. Don't trust him.
You people make me laugh ....Nice short answers with one purpose ....Plant the seed of doubt..
Oh, and people shouldn't doubt what they see? That is the path to ignorance. I don't accept every conspircay and alien video there are, I try to
look at both the "believer" side, and the "skeptics". I suggest people to do this. Alongside with checking the source, who said it, what channels
are sending it? etc...
1. why are they shining lights in it's eyes and grappling with it??
Good point. But ask yourself this: how do people communicate with the alien? Can we understand what it says? etc...
2. Why is the video poor quality I worked in Navy intel and Know there are military Video and photographers who could make it very clear, what
was the purpose of filming this to the military?
Well, because if the footage would be clear, we would probably see the fake right away. The hoaxers want us to wonder wheter it is a real alien or
/ ..It seems EVERYTIME a post is made with a photograph or video or ufo ..Someone ALWAYS shouts 'Fake' but with NO supporting evidence ..Jeez
< Shakes head >
What else should people do? Do you have supporting evidence that the footage is real?
Why doesn't people ask themselves how these tapes really get out? The Alien Autopsy got out, yet, we only recieved the copy. This movie was copied
too. Wow, so they can get anything but the original out of any military installation... hmm... strange. I'm sure there will be another one, and
another one after that one, and so on.
And when the day comes when a really good fake is released, and people believe in it, then they will continue their story with books, info, and so
on. Everything to sell and get money for their hoax, if not make another one.
it looks like some guy wearing an alien suit.
Looks like a doll to me..., more like a lage muppet.
He further explains that Victor deliberately removed the audio
track to protect the identity of the men in the video and to also
help protect his own anonymity.
How does he expect us to believe the footage, and ever get to the truth, if we can't ever hear anything they said?
George Knapp, the TV journalist who encouraged Bob Lazar to go public with his knowledge has shown that Lazar's pay cheques from the time he
claimed to be working at Area 51 had DNI stamped on them.
Another thing that makes it even more faked. As I said, Lazar is a fake. George Knapp is, apparently, a sloppy journalist by the way. The DNI could
very well proove to be a link between the fakes.
Also, note that they never mention why the room is so dark. "Victor" doesn't even mentions if the alien is alergic or something. Yet, it is
strange. Let's assume they kept the room dark because the alien don't or can't see in bright areas, then why do the doctors shine flashlights into
the creature's eyes?
Rocket Home Pictures Productions
Not exactly CNN or Fox TV, is it?
Victor believes that if his identity is discovered and
he is subsequently assassinated, this would only further help to
confirm the claims and authenticity behind the film.
I find this most ironic. The Alien Autopsy flick didn't proove the source material, so "they" (the ones knowing it all about aliens and etc)
didn't have a need to cover it up, let alone kill anyone.
Now, this movie has been aired without any proof. See where this is going? If the first and second can't be prooved, or even won't, then what reason
are there for people to believe that any future footage is real? Because if the day comes when a real footage is aired, people won't believe it
because there have been so much hoaxes and claims, and no proof at all, that they don't have any reason to even watch the "real footage". Know what
The footage first came to light on the Art Bell radio show on
13th March, 1997 when ufologist Sean David Morton was interviewed.
I've heard some bad things about this Art Bell. Why air it there? Why not air it to the general public first, and then to UFOlogists?
Lot's of stuff here...