ET Interview: Video of Grey Alien Interview Smuggled from Area 51, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times
Topic started on 18-6-2004 @ 12:29 PM by AboveTopSecret.com

THE EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL INTERVIEW

IS THIS CONTROVERSIAL VIDEO FACT OR FICTION?

Alien Interview

Background

The color video footage, which lasts for a total of two minutes and fifty-five seconds, was apparently smuggled out of the secret Groom Lake "Area 51" facility in Nevada by a man referring to himself as "Victor". The video film depicts a Grey alien being interrogated at the government facility.

The footage first came to light on the Art Bell radio show on 13th March, 1997 when ufologist Sean David Morton was interviewed. Morton claimed the interrogation was fairly recent, sometime in 1996, and that renowned UFO expert Bob Dean apparently cried at the advanced screening of the film.

After claiming to have smuggled the film out of the Groom Lake facility in Nevada, Victor resolved to have the footage broadcast on network television as soon as possible in order to pulicly expose his claims. Victor believes that if his identity is discovered and he is subsequently assassinated, this would only further help to confirm the claims and authenticity behind the film.

Victor approached many television companies in his attempts to show the footage to the public. He first approached Fox TV, who turned him down after the problems in authenticity they had when the Roswell autopsy footage was shown by them. Fox felt they were being deceived for a second time. Eventually, in July 1996, Victor found an independent production company in Los Angeles, California called Rocket Home Pictures Productions, who agreed to produce a documentary based around the interview. Morton was brought in by Rocket's president, Tom Coleman, to give his views, thus being the first "outsider" to view the footage.

Contents Of The Video

After seeing the interview footage, Morton provides a chilling and detailed description of what he saw:

"The film was shot through a large plane of glass. There was no sound accompanying the images. The interview took place in a darkened room, lit with an eerie greenish glow, I could make out the silhouettes of two men, one dressed in military uniform with what appeared to be the stars on the epaulet of his jacket, and another more casually dressed man with his hand occassionally rubbing his forehead. They sat with their backs to the camera at one end of a long table, which was littered with wires, chords and microphones. There were what appeared to be medical devices. One in particular was blinking erratically, as if it was monitoring a very sick heart. And there sitting at the end of the table was a small, beige-skinned, black-eyed, bulbous headed creature, the like of which haunt the nightmares of thousands of unwilling abductees."

Morton made many references to the creature's sick appearance and condition. The alien made very jerky movements and kept bobbing up and down. He continued to describe the apparently distressed state the creature was in.

"Its skin was a pinkish beige, but the rest of the head looked purple and bruised, as if it had suffered severe contusions across the skull."

The contents of the tape grew progressively more disturbing. Towards the end of the tape, the creature goes into what appears to be violent spasms, as if it was having a seizure. The mouth of the alien opens and closes before a foam begins to come out. At that point the heart monitor (as described by Morton) begins to start jumping wildly, at which point the man in the military looking uniform signals to a couple of medics, who rush into the frame and aid the alien. As the doctors treat the alien, the footage suddenly comes to an abrupt end.

Fact or Fiction?

The authenticity of the footage is seen differently by many people. Morton is convinced the footage is real due to strong relationships with stories of alien abductees and the information on the footage in the lower part of the frame.

I myself am dubious, but do recognise the factors which lead to its possible true authenticity. The ET's appearance and features are recognisable as those mentioned by hundreds of abductees. Known as "The Gourdos" or the more feared "Grey" species, the alien is instantly recognisable by any Ufologist.

Another factor helping the video's authenticity is the information etched into the bottom of the video.

DNI/27 04:02:58:18

The footage has the characters DNI/27 burnt into the bottom line of the frame, along with what appears to be the time code numbers for date, minutes and seconds. The letters DNI could be an acronym for the Department of Naval Intelligence, the group responsible for the Area 51 base, a fact not many people know about. The DNI connection to Area 51 has been widely investigated. George Knapp, the TV journalist who encouraged Bob Lazar to go public with his knowledge has shown that Lazar's pay cheques from the time he claimed to be working at Area 51 had DNI stamped on them.

Victor's Reasoning

The best place to possibly determine the authenticity of the alien interview footage is the source, in this case a mysterious man known as Victor who won't reveal ANY specific details about himself in fear of discovery and assassination. If the man is telling the truth about his background at Area 51, then this is understandable. But how can the film be verified without any knowledge of it?

The producer of the documentary, Jeff Broadstreet, does know how Victor took the footage from the base. Victor told him he managed to obtain a copy of the video when in an unsupervised moment. Broadstreet stated the following:

"He was assisting in the process of downloading a large amount of video analogue tape to storage on DVD or digital video disc."

He further explains that Victor deliberately removed the audio track to protect the identity of the men in the video and to also help protect his own anonymity. Victor also told the producer that he thought the man on the left, who is seen with his hand to his head during much of the segment, is a military telepath apparently used to assist in communication with the creature.

Since the creature is obviously in a great deal of distress, when Broadstreet asked if the creature died later, Victor replied cryptically, "I'm not sure, but I know it was retired from the interview process."

According to Victor, the contents of the removed audio track involved an attempt at trying to obtain some form of technological information from the alien about the coordinates of a ship or object. He does not know, or wouldn't tell, whether the alien was attending the interview voluntarily or against his will after he had been recovered from some UFO crash retrieval operation.



reply posted on 18-6-2004 @ 04:26 PM by Boogie
Cocco the agenda is money. People create fakes to get rich quick or to make a living at selling books about nonsense so they don't have to get their butt up every day and go to work like most of us. Sean David Morton is a terrible predictor of the future and I don't know how he got the claim as a "ufologist". I wish I remembered the site...try google...but the site tracked past predictions of Morton and many others and boy are these guys lousy.

Now I do agree with you about there being some truth behind the flood of info, but you have to be very selective about where this info is coming from and do some background checks on it. Honestly, when the military has people coming forward and saying this stuff isn't ours and especially when you look back at the 40's and 50's UFO reports where these craft were doing things that might be plausible today but in no way were in existance on Earth at that time...you really only can come to one conclusion. But just because aliens may very much be here, doesn't mean you should listen to the latest guy on Coast 2 Coast who says he's got the "real" story.

The thing I like about this Victor film is that the "grey" is pink! Which has been stated by some ex-military as being the color of the aliens. They supposedly have silver/grey jumpsuits, yet their skin tone is reportedly a pinkish-pale-grey color. Unfortunately this video is just too unprovable to really say yea or nay and unless this Victor guy comes out and can prove he worked there then all this is just something to say hmmmm. And having Morton's name attached to this video in any way makes it very suspicious.


reply posted on 18-6-2004 @ 06:26 PM by rynaldo82
Originally posted by mrmulder
Originally posted by mpeake
Anyone have a link to the video?




Here you go!
www.ufocasebook.com...

Note: You must have Real Player installed on your machine to view the video.


Great job finding the link 'MrMulder'. Good point 'Mindswog' abou the video being a fake, why the poor quality?

Rynaldo



reply posted on 18-6-2004 @ 07:15 PM by RX84
First of all, Bob Lazar is a real fake. Don't trust him.

You people make me laugh ....Nice short answers with one purpose ....Plant the seed of doubt..


Oh, and people shouldn't doubt what they see? That is the path to ignorance. I don't accept every conspircay and alien video there are, I try to look at both the "believer" side, and the "skeptics". I suggest people to do this. Alongside with checking the source, who said it, what channels are sending it? etc...

1. why are they shining lights in it's eyes and grappling with it??


Good point. But ask yourself this: how do people communicate with the alien? Can we understand what it says? etc...

2. Why is the video poor quality I worked in Navy intel and Know there are military Video and photographers who could make it very clear, what was the purpose of filming this to the military?

Well, because if the footage would be clear, we would probably see the fake right away. The hoaxers want us to wonder wheter it is a real alien or not.

/ ..It seems EVERYTIME a post is made with a photograph or video or ufo ..Someone ALWAYS shouts 'Fake' but with NO supporting evidence ..Jeez < Shakes head >


What else should people do? Do you have supporting evidence that the footage is real?

Why doesn't people ask themselves how these tapes really get out? The Alien Autopsy got out, yet, we only recieved the copy. This movie was copied too. Wow, so they can get anything but the original out of any military installation... hmm... strange. I'm sure there will be another one, and another one after that one, and so on.

And when the day comes when a really good fake is released, and people believe in it, then they will continue their story with books, info, and so on. Everything to sell and get money for their hoax, if not make another one.

it looks like some guy wearing an alien suit.


Looks like a doll to me..., more like a lage muppet.

He further explains that Victor deliberately removed the audio
track to protect the identity of the men in the video and to also
help protect his own anonymity.


How does he expect us to believe the footage, and ever get to the truth, if we can't ever hear anything they said?

George Knapp, the TV journalist who encouraged Bob Lazar to go public with his knowledge has shown that Lazar's pay cheques from the time he claimed to be working at Area 51 had DNI stamped on them.


Another thing that makes it even more faked. As I said, Lazar is a fake. George Knapp is, apparently, a sloppy journalist by the way. The DNI could very well proove to be a link between the fakes.

Also, note that they never mention why the room is so dark. "Victor" doesn't even mentions if the alien is alergic or something. Yet, it is strange. Let's assume they kept the room dark because the alien don't or can't see in bright areas, then why do the doctors shine flashlights into the creature's eyes?

Rocket Home Pictures Productions


Not exactly CNN or Fox TV, is it?

Victor believes that if his identity is discovered and
he is subsequently assassinated, this would only further help to
confirm the claims and authenticity behind the film.


I find this most ironic. The Alien Autopsy flick didn't proove the source material, so "they" (the ones knowing it all about aliens and etc) didn't have a need to cover it up, let alone kill anyone.

Now, this movie has been aired without any proof. See where this is going? If the first and second can't be prooved, or even won't, then what reason are there for people to believe that any future footage is real? Because if the day comes when a real footage is aired, people won't believe it because there have been so much hoaxes and claims, and no proof at all, that they don't have any reason to even watch the "real footage". Know what I mean?

The footage first came to light on the Art Bell radio show on
13th March, 1997 when ufologist Sean David Morton was interviewed.


I've heard some bad things about this Art Bell. Why air it there? Why not air it to the general public first, and then to UFOlogists?

Lot's of stuff here...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags
The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags