It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by primus2012
Those that are opposed to this bill probably have darn good reasons other than "they're profiling me and that's not fair".
A few examples:
1. I have a few kilos of something illegal in my trunk.
2. I am an illegal living in this country for a long time and have avoided INS thus far. I work for cash and don't want to pay taxes.
3. I frequently cross the borders and would be inconvenienced by all the extra checking.
4. I am a citizen, but am wanted on several warrants.
5. I'm against anything that has to do with possibly hurting someone's feelings other than caucasian males who are the devil and are obviously related to Nazi's.
6. Drugs and violence are USA's fault even though the major players are from Mexico, Central and South America.
[edit on 1-5-2010 by primus2012]
[edit on 1-5-2010 by primus2012]
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Evisscerator
Now, can someone please tell me, again, just HOW these hard-working individuals, who happen to risk a lot to come into the USA illegally, yet contribute to the economies of their local cities and towns are taking away JOBS from legal residents?
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by XNeMeSis21
Another ignorant comment, from a TRUE racist who is so completely blinded by skin color, that he/she has FAILED to read the bill. The police ARE NOT out to look for illegals PRIMARILY!! If an illegal alien gets pulled over for speeding, or stopped for loitering or some other offense, like ANY of us, they will be asked for ID. If in the couse of that ID'ing, it's found they are here illegally, they can be arrested for that, it doesn't matter WHAT country they are from, or the color of their skin. The police WILL NOT be pulling over people because they look Mexican. Jesus Christ people. The language in the law was amended so to ease the fears that those who either report a crime, or victims of a crime will be asked to prove citizenship, they WILL NOT. Only if you're suspected of breaking a law or ordinance, and the police, as with ANY OTHER stop, must have probable cause, and skin color is NOT probable cause. This law MIRRORS the federal laws, which the feds refuse to enforce because they are bought and paid for by special interests, and those interests are not of the American people.
[edit on 1-5-2010 by 27jd]
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by piddles
Why not focus on the people who make it easy for them to sneak in and get a job? The only reason why they risk their lives is because they know someone will hire them. If the Fed. gov't severely punished people who hire illegals (min. 25 years, exorbitant fines) and spent the mpney they do on enforcing their poorly enforced laws on deep, thorough investigations into illegal immigrant employers, I HIGHLY doubt this would be as big of a problem as it is.
That's right, let's empower a federal government--the same government that has been given the power to protect our borders and stop much of the illegal crossings, but has failed miserably doing so--to criminalize citizens for doing nothing more than hiring a person and giving them a job. What a concept! It must be the fault of hard working, but undeniably evil business people. They're the reason we have all the problems with illegal aliens.
It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the social welfare programs, and very loud, vocal arguments from politicians clamoring for amnesty. Nooooo, that sort of thing is noble and just, but business? Well, any enlightened soul knows business is the root of all evil, so let's keep our borders wide open and easy to cross, let's tax the hell out of the evil people who dare to make a profit off of their own business, so we can redistribute that wealth to illegals, then let us demand amnesty for them while we imprison those who gave them jobs. It's so simple really.
[edit on 1-5-2010 by Jean Paul Zodeaux]
people who hire illegals for work are LAZY (not hardworking) and would rather pay someone peanuts than a citizen what they're supposed to get.
also I have to tell you: you're nothing short of retarded. How are people who hire illegals not spreading the wealth to illegals?
Originally posted by RedskinWally
PS I'm not supporting the illegals. Just pointing out this does not only effect Mexicans.
Originally posted by keldorn
If the Feds step in and overule Arizona state law, which they will, then the only thing Arizona can do to stop Federal law is to secede.
Originally posted by Amelie
The illegals are not getting deported, guaranteed more citizens will see trouble from this then illegals who will most likely be detained for a bit.
[edit on 1-5-2010 by Amelie]
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by piddles
people who hire illegals for work are LAZY (not hardworking) and would rather pay someone peanuts than a citizen what they're supposed to get.
Your own lack of research to support this claim indicates just how LAZY you are in an effort to demonize business. NPR, for example, reports that of the more than 12 million illegal immigrants in this country, more than half work in construction, manufacturing and leisure/hospitality, but I assure you that you will have a difficult time proving that they were hired to do these jobs, because their employers were too "LAZY" to do the work themselves.
Further, that same article claims that if there were no illegal immigrants to take unattractive work, such as working in meat plants, the "LAZY" businesses you refer to would simply just invest in technologies to do that job for them.
also I have to tell you: you're nothing short of retarded. How are people who hire illegals not spreading the wealth to illegals?
Of course, this statement makes no sense, as I never made any claim that those who hired illegals weren't spreading wealth. This is your canard, attempting to equate social programs that engage in wealth redistribution with free market principles. Try again.
[edit on 1-5-2010 by Jean Paul Zodeaux]
but I assure you that you will have a difficult time proving that they were hired to do these jobs, because their employers were too "LAZY" to do the work themselves.
I don't have to research, it's totally obvious.you just proved my point for me by saying 6 million of them are employed illegally. If their employers wouldn't hire them, why would else would they be here?
because there's no official documentation, because they don't have to insure them or put them on any sort of official payroll, hence why they hire illegals and why illegals come here. they KNOW employers will cut whatever costs they can, especially in these trying times.
Technology costs money to purchase and maintain. illegal laborers are less than a fraction of the cost.
perhaps that's not exactly what you said, but when did I even mention any kind of social program before you mentioned it?
when did I say amnesty is the way to go?
I'm making the point that we're patronizing the wrong people since they have no money and will always find new ways to come here if there's work, even after being deported.