Ok, so apparently I'll have to do your "research" for you.
Originally posted by Psyagra
Angels huh? ... And they need Lot to protect them from gays and drunken violent people by offering his two virgin daughters in their stead?!

It was only until Lot granted hospitality to the two angels did he in fact learn they were angels sent to destroy the place and grant Lot refuge in
Zoar. With their salvation in the hands of the angels, who in their right mind would let them be violated sexually by a drunk, gay, angry mob?
Offering his daughters would have been the most logical thing to do. Two things about this as well: There's nothing to say that this wasn't an
empty gesture anyway since Lot knew the men were gay. There's nothing to say hat Lot never had the consent of his daughters before hand either. One
who's looking to discredit the Bible however would just gloss over these ideas.
Also, you say this and quote angels underneath as if to say that they weren't expressly stated as being angels with Lot in the bible. Why do you do
this?
It was not an entire country that was nuked ... it was two cities - and not very big ones at that.
It was 4 cities. Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboim. It would have been 5 (Zoar) had it not been for Lot's pleading to save any righteous men still
living there. This place was known as the Pentapolis. ..and yes, it was large enough that people MIGRATED there to raise families and live out the
rest of their days.
Pray tell ... how did anyone know that they got him drunk ... that he would have refused if sober (remember he offered them to be raped by the
heathens you describe so eloquently) ... who documented or told this story on? ... the girls? ... couldn't have been Lot because he was too drunk to
remember - right? (Excuse me but I can't help wondering how he got it up in that state ... s'pose its not completely impossible though)
Complete straw man.
They new full well that they were not the only people left on the planet ... they knew, for example, that Abraham and his buddies were still
around ... oh, and lets not forget the village/city that Lot asked the "angels" to spare ... no?
Abraham and Lot were at odds with each other. Abraham seperated himself from Lot because Lot turned his mind to worldy possessions instead of living
by faith. While Abraham ventured to where God lead him, Lot went to Sodom because he saw with his own eyes that it pleased him for the land was
fertile and well watered. Perhaps I should have worded it better in that the daugters felt it was their duty to perserve their family line, if not
repopulate the region (again, you're underestimating the destruction).
The village Lot asked to spare was Zoar. It was on the list for destruction, but Lot's only plea was that he have somewhere to go and that any
righteous man still living there be saved. No doubt there is an alterior motive in that Lot, not truly living by faith, wanted to stay in the area of
fertile land. Lot however, (much like you) underestimated the destruction and ended up living in a cave to get away from the people of Zoar since
they were originally as sinful as the rest.
Its amazing how, when one highlights double standards like these in the Bible, that defenders pop out to justify the very actions that Sodom
and Gomorrah were destroyed for. How strong that sense of fear is that the church instills if you dare question ... rather cover it up with all
manner of illogical justifications than say "Haaaaang on just one minute!!" 
I find it more amazing that people with no "working" knowledge of the Bible and what it entails, even attempts to explain anything about it.
"A greebolwok was killed while trunjugattling a horrifsteltler, for woggleraftting a quidliggerton". - Can you tell me if this is a bad thing? No.
If you could study to tell me, would you? ..still no.