It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I dunno... the Persians I know all seem to be very balanced people...
news.bbc.co.uk...
There were lots of female protestors - I saw a guard attack one women and then she went back up to him and grabbed him by the collar and said 'why are you doing this? Are you not an Iranian?' - he was totally disarmed and didn't know what to do but her actions stopped him.
Even in some of these videos you can hear riot police saying "I don't want to hit you! Please get out of here" Women were even successfully protecting downed riot police from the angry mobs... I agree that more force could have been used, but I also think there are cultural things which mean much more to them as well. I mean look how long it took them to cross the "red line"...
Originally posted by warrenb
nice
when is this going to happen in the US?
Hamid Dabashi is the author of "Iran: A People Interrupted." He is Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University in New York. His Web site is www.hamiddabashi.com...
The overwhelming majority of the people pouring into streets of Tehran and other major cities in support of Moussavi are precisely these 15- to 29-year-olds. How could this then be a middle-class uprising if the overwhelming majority of those who are supporting it and putting their lives on the line are in fact jobless 15- to 29-year-olds who still live with their parents -- who cannot even afford to rent an apartment, let alone marry and raise a family and join the middle class in a principally oil-based economy that is not labor-intensive to begin with?
Another crucial statistic that Salehi-Isfahani does not cite is the fact that more than 63 percent of university entrants in Iran are women, but only 12 percent are part of the labor force. That means that the remaining 51 percent are out of a job, and yet the most visible aspect of these anti-Ahmadinejad demonstrations is that women visibly outnumber men. How could jobless men and women be participating in a massive middle-class uprising against their "uncouth" leaders?
The fact is that given the structural limitations of a nascent democracy that is being crushed and buried in Iran under a particular interpretation of a Shiite juridical citadel, opposition to Ahmadinejad is fractured into the followers of three candidates with deeply divided economic programs and political positions.
Moussavi is universally known as a hard-core socialist in his economic platform and a social reformist in his politics. Mehdi Karrubi is far to Moussavi's right in his economic neo-liberalism and social conservatism. Mohsen Rezaie, meanwhile, is even more to the right of Karrubi in his social conservatism but to his left in his economic platform.
But the fact is that a major constituency of Moussavi is also the urban poor and particularly the war veterans who have no respect for Ahmadinejad, believing he had an inglorious war record, but are full of unsurpassed admiration for Moussavi because of his role as a fiercely dedicated prime minister during the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988).
We need to adjust our lenses and languages in order to see better, and there is no better adjustment than just cautiously, hopefully and responsibly watching what is unfolding in front of us and reading it accordingly.
This movement is ahead of our inherited politics, floating ideologies or mismatched theories. We need to sit back, hope for the best and let this inspirational movement of a whole new generation of hope teach us courage and humility.
Kudos to CNN for having the courage to post this learned man's short essay which I highly recomend all the ATS armchair warriors looking to make these civil disturbances into something they are not to fit your own theories on the world and the Middle East ought to take a moment to read.
While almost everyone posting to this issue has an almost purely emotional take and reason to be posting on it, I honestly and humbly feel the majority haven't a clue as to what is really driving this or going on over there...
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Kudos to CNN for having the courage to post this learned man's short essay which I highly recomend all the ATS armchair warriors looking to make these civil disturbances into something they are not to fit your own theories on the world and the Middle East ought to take a moment to read.
even his essay is simplistic -
in addition - people's interests and concerns don't deserve to be swept into the "armchair warrior" bin
While almost everyone posting to this issue has an almost purely emotional take and reason to be posting on it, I honestly and humbly feel the majority haven't a clue as to what is really driving this or going on over there...
what is your point - exactly?
why don't you just say?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Very well put...
I think most people get emotional when they see people fighting an "Authority" figure in the streets. It brings out the want to help the underdog in most people. Especially when there is YouBoob videos plastered everywhere showing young ladies dying in the streets. The people of Iran want change, so do we all. OK so many including myself dont understand fully the intricacies of Iranian culture or politics.
This doesnt stop me from lending emotional support and prayers for the ones who are fighting and dying for what "They" believe they want. I still say more power to them. I remember the mass majority of the supporters who overthrew the Shaw in 1979 were students from the universities. The very same age group. So I wonder how that factors in?
My point is people are reacting emotionally to a propoganda machine's distortion of events and cheering in unison something that they can not have any credible idea is even good for the Middle East/Asia, the Iranian or the American people.
People are rushing to judgements and conclusions that at the end of the day might very well not have been in their individual or collective best interests to rush to and support.
Most people can't ...
Originally posted by malganis
Wow these are people really running their own country. Remember when Bush allegedly cheated to get re-elected so he could screw the USA over for another 4 years? Or when Gordon Brown was stuck in power without our permission?
People sat and moaned a bit on the computer then went and watched some TV and forgot all about it. Us westerners love watching these videos because it reminds us of Hollywood movies, but I couldn't see us ever actually doing it.
what we're watching here is a series of events that are emotional - for the people involveed as well as for people who are watching them from half a world away
I don't consider responding to people's responses regarding the issues to be off topic or attempting to hijack a thread to promote a platform.
I feel for everyone involved and everyone in the world too, but I do my level best not to let it cloud my judgement.
and - thank you for letting me share my thoughts
A commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards has been arrested for refusing to obey Iran's Supreme Leader, according to reports from the Balatarin. General Ali Fazli, who was recently appointed as a commander of the Revolutionary Guards in the province of Tehran, is reported to have been arrested after he refused to carry out orders from the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei to use force on people protesting the controversial re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Fazli, a veteran of the devastating Iran-Iraq war is also believed to have been sacked and taken to an unknown location.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
and - thank you for letting me share my thoughts
You are welcome, thank you for sharing them!
Thank you very much for sharing them.