Strange 'Moving' Object On Mars!

Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Well I do appreciate that you search for these anomolies. My point is that even if a rock did move and it wasnt just a change in the filming perspective, then I am sure someone could come up with a logical explanation, like it was pumice or something.

And with these words of wisdom we now close down this web site.

Whatever anomaly this thread portrays, there will always be a "Magic Bullet" theory to explain it, and all the other strange phenomenon reported on this site - which renders all documentation and investigation of it pointless. It's okay folks, there's a rational explanation to everything, go back to watching "Dancing With The Stars".

yeah, more than likely a Martian quake, not a "walking rock"...

don't let your imagination get the best of you...

Here's another example of MailBox Head style Mars animals.This is from sol 404 Spirit marsrover.nasa.gov... The last 2 pics look for the head next to the letter "H" in "Head".

reply to post by bloodline
RenDMC image used (diagram style) When the MailBox Head moves it wobbles back and forth so the exact match of the outlines askew(not a simple fast crop) means the outlines belong to a moving creature that wobbles side to side,has a face,and a low to the ground compact body.The face is symetrical as are many other examples of these LIVE Mars creatures.I have seen them for 5 years.Few people bother looking for these creatures because they would have no idea what to look for,with no prior experience.Has this ever stopped me from outlining things most people can't or won't bother to see? When a Cater-Crawler stands right in front of the MailBox Head,it illustrates how close these animals of diverse species move and sometimes even ride each other.This Humanesque head on a Caterpillar body is hard to see if you never expected it. Wild Stuff.Shocking.



[edit on 28-5-2009 by vze2xjjk]

reply to post by mikesingh


yes trully amazing, looks like some Aliens Buried a Human up to his um...
and has been there that long it's fossilized in to Stone.

I think it's trying to moon me!

And for some strange reason the Aliens seemed to have painted a
bulls-eye on it. And those small Indentations appear to Phaser marks
used for target practice. They hit the Target, butt didn't get dead center.

Originally posted by vze2xjjk

Stop wasting our lives with this rubbish.

Please.

This is very interesting. Could it be an alien with a shell resembling a rock or perhaps it carries the rock on its back to elude detection.

reply to post by contemplator

I have attached a link to demonstrate what I am talking about.


reply to post by Heisenberg

reply to post by mikesingh


Which rock to the left of the "moving rock" are you talking about?

I don't know what picture this is but, in this video slideshow of Mars anomalies, there is a still image that seems to be strange and moving at 00:59:00 (fifty-nine seconds).

Very compelling if a valid source image.

LINK

reply to post by Heisenberg
The reason the faces an bodies on Mars look like rocks is because they are purposely falsely masked by Nasa to disguise them(against disclosure).Similarly the public outcry in the 70's /80's was that the sky and American flag fro Viking pics were color distorted to make everything FALSE ORANGE to disguise any relevant details of life and deny the BLUE SKY on Mars. Here's an unrelated Pathfinder pic to show the masking,and purposeful misdirection. Just like thepic of the spiny insectoid with false eye-marks to fool predators with camo. Rubbish is such a funny word to me,like the 3 Stooges"I smell rubbish burning."

Why does Nasa disguise these faces? Are we not able to handle the truth? Perhaps we are too feeble minded to understand Life on Mars,and we should bury our heads in the sand.

Are the aliens actually pieces of an asteroid? A living asteroid.

reply to post by vze2xjjk

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Which rock to the left of the "moving rock" are you talking about?

This one. The one in the yellow square. The red line indicates the 'levels' of this one as well as the object in question. The second image shows the rock (in the yellow square) to be in the same place whilst the object has 'moved' several feet.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4d3035c20963.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e6c6fb2e90b1.jpg[/atsimg]

This is a little perplexing, though I agree with the explanation for that 'moving' rock is due to the parallax effect. But both these rocks apparently being at the same level, it's strange why the marked rock remains at the same place.

This is probably is an optical illusion. The 'moving' object must be actually farther behind, though it doesn't look to be so!

Cheers!

reply to post by justsomeboreddude


Something that moves in a place that is supposed to be completely barren is a big deal. What could move in a place with no living creatures? Wind push a massive rock? That thing would weigh at least 500 lbs maybe 250 on mars. Seeing something move on mars is a huge deal.

Plus we have creatures here on earth that have incredible resilience to extremely harsh environments.

[edit on 29-5-2009 by DaMod]

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Which rock to the left of the "moving rock" are you talking about?

This one. The one in the yellow square. The red line indicates the 'levels' of this one as well as the object in question. The second image shows the rock (in the yellow square) to be in the same place whilst the object has 'moved' several feet.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4d3035c20963.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e6c6fb2e90b1.jpg[/atsimg]

This is a little perplexing, though I agree with the explanation for that 'moving' rock is due to the parallax effect. But both these rocks apparently being at the same level, it's strange why the marked rock remains at the same place.

This is probably is an optical illusion. The 'moving' object must be actually farther behind, though it doesn't look to be so!

Cheers!

Ok look at the first picture. Look how tall our "alien moving rock" is as compared to rock A.

Now look at the 2nd picture. It was taken at a difference of maybe 4%

Basically the same angle yet a few moments later.

You would still be able to see our moving rock of doom behind rock A.

The thing I find strangest is this object manifests both in these two pictures and then in a later picture between rock A. and B.

Two anomalies in the same location? I don't care how skeptical you are about multi-cellular life on mars (I am a skeptic on this subject also), you should be able to obviously see that something moved in these shots. There is no way this would happen twice in the same location especially with a difference of 4%. Not possible.

I don't know if it is a living thing but man it is sure acting like one. I mean cmon! There is supposed to be no life on mars! What could move on a place with no life? A huge rock? If that is so why wasn't the rover carried away also? You can obviously see it moved! Are you guys blind?

Perhaps my point. I don't have any image editing software at this location, could someone perhaps animate the 3 frames? Once slow and then speeding up? We will get a better idea of the aspect this way.

[edit on 29-5-2009 by DaMod]

Originally posted by vze2xjjk

Why does Nasa disguise these faces? Are we not able to handle the truth? Perhaps we are too feeble minded to understand Life on Mars,and we should bury our heads in the sand.

Your not able to handle the truth ther is F*** ALL THERE stop wasting everyones time and internet bandwidth go look at some porn or something.

[edit on 29-5-2009 by wmd_2008]

Are we sure this is Mars?

Look in the fourth photograph. To the right looks like boot prints we left on the moon.

If it were a wheel, as in the Rover, we should see some continuity, not multiple "placements."

reply to post by dooper


What "fourth photograph" are you talking about, there are only three in the OP.

reply to post by ArMaP

Three were on the thread, and at the bottom, there was another you had to click on.