posted on May, 30 2009 @ 01:18 AM
reply to post by wyldwylly
Very interesting observation!
But we really don't know if that 'track' has been formed by that object. There must be another explanation! If
not, then this one's pretty intriguing!
But have you also noticed how the 'moving' object is neatly hidden by the stone on the left? An exact fit, what? Check out the height of the object
and move it behind that stone. Being taller, its top should have been fairly vsible, but its not! Probably another optical illusion?
So the three points that need to be explained are:
> The 'tracks'.
> The small flat stone, marked in a yellow square immediately left of the object, which has not been displaced at all, though apparently being at the
> The height of the object being more than the stone hiding it, the top should have been visible.
[edit on 30-5-2009 by mikesingh]