It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Epic Wolf
Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by Epic Wolf
You did misinterpret, as well as miss the point of the entire post. Your assumption is wrong,the basis of my post was not solely on the comparison of the relationship of the fetus to the mother.
You are saying many different things here. You're contradicting yourself. It's arguments like yours why i left organized religiong, seriously. Look again, all you're doing is defining what a fetus and a host is and saying that's why it's okay. It's not an argument, it's more like notes in science class.
Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by Epic Wolf
I do not beleive that you are a sexist, just that you are fallible and cannot see when you are acting like someone who is sexist. You have totally ignored what I"VE been saying because this little strawman thing has got you so riled up that you can't see what is right there. Hosts do not have rights under any constitution that i'm aware of.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Twista
Ok Dr Conspire, lets say you were rapped and held at gun point by the most vile human being in the world. Would you give birth to the rapist's daughter?
The child is innocent and therefore does not deserve to be painfully put to death because of the sin of the biological father. I am a woman and I say YES ... I would definately give birth to MY INNOCENT DAUGHTER.
Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by Miraj
My point is the same as it was on the first page. Until we know, we are cowards for taking the easy route.
Originally posted by Supercertari
reply to post by Dr Conspire
Without reference to spirituality, God or religion what is destroyed in abortion is a human life. Strictly and biologically it is a human life distinct in quality and nature from a bundle of cells on an arm or individual sperm, ova.
It is human because it has the genetic coding of the species (for example when someone announces they are pregnant we don't worry that they're going to give birth to an elephant.)
It has life because it exhibits: homeostasis, organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, reproduction.
Now it is possible to go on and speak of "souls", "personhood", "consciousness" etc. but none of that is required to show the fetus is a "human life" it is the pro-choice lobby who must instead introduce such numinous qualities to justify the termination of these human lives.
Those who proclaim a pro-choice attitude on this issue whilst speaking of animal rights could make a fortune in the fur trade. Wait until the seal is about to give birth, wait till the cub has crowned then crush its skull and take it from the womb to harvest the fur - its not a baby seal yet after all. Pro-choice vegetarians can enjoy veal from aborted bovine fetuses. Imagine the economic possibilities ~ after all that's what its all about.
Those adovcating abortion in the case of rape, I look forward to your lobbying your government for the death penalty in all cases of rape. After all why should the innocent consequence be the only human life eradicated? I know, people would worry that sometimes the innocent would be executed but hey they already are, you've demonstrated no concern for the innocent so far.
To the OP, believing your question was more metaphysical than material, I am assured that she who was given as mother to us all by her Son gathers the souls of these martyrs of modernism to her immaculate and maternal heart and presents them to her Son as his brothers and sisters.
Originally posted by Dr Conspire
Since Easy legal Abortions were introduced , it is estimated that there have been approx 250 million potential human lives extinguished in the western world over not so many years, in fact the numbers are embarrassing if that word is appropriate.
Just where do these miniature humans ripped from their hosts wombs go?
Originally posted by Supercertari
It has life because it exhibits: homeostasis, organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, reproduction.
Now it is possible to go on and speak of "souls", "personhood", "consciousness" etc. but none of that is required to show the fetus is a "human life" it is the pro-choice lobby who must instead introduce such numinous qualities to justify the termination of these human lives.
Those who proclaim a pro-choice attitude on this issue whilst speaking of animal rights could make a fortune in the fur trade. Wait until the seal is about to give birth, wait till the cub has crowned then crush its skull and take it from the womb to harvest the fur - its not a baby seal yet after all.
Imagine the economic possibilities ~ after all that's what its all about.
Originally posted by flyindevil
Fetuses have no consciousness, and if they do, they don't think; they only sense.
Fetuses don't feel pain.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by flyindevil
Fetuses have no consciousness, and if they do, they don't think; they only sense.
And how would you know that?
Unborn children suck their thumbs in the womb. They open and close their eyes. They sleep. They wake up. They play with their toes. They play with the cord. It's all well documented.
Fetuses don't feel pain.
That's dead wrong.
Pain of the unborn
more pain of the unborn
many articles
Fact is .. when surgeons perform surgery on unborn children in the womb, they use pain killing drugs for the preborn child. If those children didn't feel pain, there would be no need to give them painkillers.
BOTTOM LINE - when someone commits abortion they murder another human being. That preborn human being has a heart beat and the person doing the killing stops that other persons heart from beating.
When one person stops another persons heart from beating ... it's murder.
And yes .. that other person feels pain.
[edit on 5/15/2009 by FlyersFan]
It's simple really. The skin cells on your arm are from a human, but are not a fully formed human. A fetus is a combination of 2 gamete cells, which multiply. From 2 humans, but not human yet.
Originally posted by Supercertari
reply to post by flyindevil
Do as your avatar suggests and deny ignorance, find the common ground which in this case is a definition of what organic life is as individuated in individual members of a species.
I understand pro-choice advocates reject belief etc. when it comes to this issue, except their own when they foist numinous notions unto what is simple biological unquestionable fact. Find the common ground - deny ignorance.
Abortion advocates often and persistently cite economics as a justification for the "choice": the particular economic situation of those who find themselves pregnant, general poverty etc. It's why there are disproportionate numbers of various races and economic status who have abortions.
In China/India etc. girls are aborted more often than males for economic reasons. In the west "career prospects" are an often cited reason. The population control mythology is based on a fear of economic hardship, etc. etc. If you think modern economics and materialism have nothing to do with the abortion phenomenon then that is trully messed up.
Originally posted by flyindevil
reply to post by flyindevil
What do you mean "[s]adly"?
Would you rather these fetuses just be thrown out, instead of possibly saving MORE lives than just itself if it lived?
If the fetus is already dead, why not use it to benefit humans?
Originally posted by Epic Wolf
Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by Epic Wolf
In your bold statement there, you were forced to take the humanity away from the pregnant woman by calling her simply "a host". Ya know, men used to think like that back in the day............
That was not my intention, and you completely missed the point.
Furthermore, by definition, she is a host to the growing fetus. That doesn't make her any less human. When a tick bites you, you are the host. Are you not human anymore? Your strawman is not a valid argument, if that's what your reply was trying to be.
Originally posted by Cds4344
Originally posted by Epic Wolf
Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by Epic Wolf
In your bold statement there, you were forced to take the humanity away from the pregnant woman by calling her simply "a host". Ya know, men used to think like that back in the day............
That was not my intention, and you completely missed the point.
Furthermore, by definition, she is a host to the growing fetus. That doesn't make her any less human. When a tick bites you, you are the host. Are you not human anymore? Your strawman is not a valid argument, if that's what your reply was trying to be.
Wow that was probably the worst rationality I've seen yet. Comparing a tick to a human life? So in a sense you're saying that since it's ok to kill off the tick, ie a living organism, it should be ok to kill the human fetus as well? Since you know, we human's are "host" in your terms.