It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by Rook1545
okay Saudi Arabia indirectly/directly gives money to hamas hezbollah and some of the princes fund these teriost training camps. IRAN FUNDS ALL terriost groups and provides them with training. This does not count the many other goverments who give terriosts safe haven.
Maybe if your head was out of your ass and you would see these things but then again what do I know? Cause you are so right.
[edit on 23-4-2009 by poedxsoldiervet]
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT APPROVED THESE METHODS END OF DISCUSSION
Your right and when the time comes I will. But when Our nation continues to elect these retards what are we supposed to do?
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by Rook1545
It works both ways guy, Show me proof that they are not? Untill then I guess we will agree to disagree.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
See? You're confused.
You're trying to use US law and apply it outside the US in a time of war.
Folks are trying to apply the Geneva Conventions to persons who do not rate protection under the Geneva Conventions, and it's clearly spelled out. God!
US law applies to US territory. US law does not apply during war on foreign soil, and especially for enemy non-uniformed combatants. Get over it.
And I didn't say anything about a foreign gun owners. I specifically said a non-uniformed combatant.
They historically have been shot on the spot - unless you wanted to squeeze them for information.
Just like spies. Or soldiers caught out of uniform trying to hide. Summarily executed. No appeal. No crime. Allowed and legal.
This is the most stupid non-topic I've ever heard of. One must be very careful for what they wish for. It may be your city that goes up in smoke because we always had to start interrogations with "please."
[edit on 23-4-2009 by dooper]
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
MY Stance on these interrogation tactics is this (cause it does seem that I have not really clarified myself) These tactics are in fact not torture, If you were to use the definition of torture like some others here have then everyday life is such. To me torture is what we saw in Vietnam and Abu Garib(sp) And maybe its even possible that the tactics today did not help anything at all. If that is the case then we should look for other methods. But when all you can come up with is it is wrong and not have alternative ideas then don’t speak about it till you do. I hope I make since to some, but I guess to many I wont.
But when all you can come up with is it is wrong and not have alternative ideas then don’t speak about it till you do.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Okay I understand where you are coming from. I know most likely if I say to you they do far worse to our troops then we do to theres, you are prolly going to say take the high road. And maybe we should, or maybe we shouldnt. But if someone comes into my yard and hurts my family, I am going to do the same to them. Maybe thats barbaric, and maybe its not but to hell with it when the world can finally get together and think happy joy joy thoughts people like me can finally do the same. But untill that day comes I wont rest untill there all destroyed or I am either way.
That goes for all enemies both foreign and domestic.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by Rook1545
It works both ways guy, Show me proof that they are not? Untill then I guess we will agree to disagree.