It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by miriam0566
when god created adam and eve, he did not intend for them to sin. to say that he did i just plain illogical and displays a lack of basic insight into this situation.
adam and eve were intended to live forever in a paradise earth
....
yes, god understood that [sin] would happen. but its not a flaw in his design. he designed them with freewill.
Originally posted by ElKapitan
but if I understand all you have written and tried to explain to me thus far God made Adam and Eve to not sin but being omniscient he knew that they would?
I can't help but see this as a design flaw; he intended them to reside forever in Paradise but as soon as he created them he knew they would not...
Perhaps it's just a paradox I cannot get my head round.
I'm not trying to argue the implication of free will, but more an inability to grasp the concept of God trying or intending anything at all. He either does or does not. I cannot begin to imagine that God intended one thing and the opposite happens, free will in Adam, Eve and man or no.
Originally posted by ElKapitan
Perhaps it's just a paradox I cannot get my head round.
Where's the paradox? Nothing said was illogical or contradictory. God's omniscience does not contradict our free will.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Christ!
I'm pretty sure that using your user name is considered blasphemy (unless you are the second coming) and breaks one of the ten commandments, the whole name in vain one. It makes it hard to take you seriously when you are breaking two rules of your own religion just with your user name!
Originally posted by badmedia
Realize that calling yourself of the flesh is about like playing a video game such as WoW, and then likening yourself as being your character in game. But it is not you, you are the consciousness/soul/spirit behind the character.
And this is also true in life. I find it somewhat amazing that people play these video games and don't even realize they are basically playing a "game" within a "game".
Imagine if you had been born into a game like WoW, or into a "matrix". That is life. As long as you see yourself as being born of the game, a part of the game and so on then you will not see the truth.
Hope that makes sense.
Originally posted by Christ!
Christ is the truth about me, and also the truth about everyone, even the "least of these my brethren". You are simply in denial, and i am not. In Jesus' day, it was also considered blasphemy. It did not stop Jesus from stating the truth. It's true whether you believe it or not.
Christ!
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
What I meant by giving the definition of the word is that the name 'Christ' is a name reserved for Jesus of Nazareth, or the Messiah. If you did a survey asking people to define the word 'Christ', 99.999999% of them would tell you it refers to Jesus. You seem to be of deep faith, would you ever introduce yourself to someone as 'Christ' and then have a religious discussion??? I have no problem with a Christian refering to themselves as 'Christ-like' or 'One with Christ', but there is a very big difference between those examples and refering to oneself as 'Christ'. My spiritual beleifs have grown far beyond Christianity, but I still try to be respectful of it's teachings when discussing it. I find this to be disrespectful of the faith, and inappropriate coming from one of it's followers, that's all I'm trying to say.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Originally posted by Christ!
Christ is the truth about me, and also the truth about everyone, even the "least of these my brethren". You are simply in denial, and i am not. In Jesus' day, it was also considered blasphemy. It did not stop Jesus from stating the truth. It's true whether you believe it or not.
Christ!
Not even close, Bubba! My eyes are wide open. I do not simply accept things because someone else tells me so, nor do I believe something just because it say's so in an ancient text.
Also, Christ, taken from the greek cristo which translates to the annointed one, is reserved for the Messiah of the ancient Hebrew holy books. So, again, unless you are the second coming *giggle*, it is both blasphemous and against the previously mentioned commandment (Exodus 20 verse 7) according to your own faith. If you cannot follow the rules of your own faith, why should anyone heed your words in reference to the same. Apparently, you seem to feel comfortable cherry picking which parts to follow and which parts to dismiss, so why shouldn't the rest of us?
[edit on 10-2-2009 by JaxonRoberts]
Originally posted by miriam0566
i bring up free will because its the key to understanding whats going on.
let me word this another way imagine for a moment that you are god. you are the sole existence. there is nothing besides you. you dont need anything. everything that is, is you.
lets say for a moment that you want companions (want, not need) someone who can share this experience of existence with you. what type of being would you create?
im sure that god could come up with an infinite number of types but i thought of three.
- you could create a sock puppet. in your mind, it could be someone else. but unfortunately its not a companion, its simply a manifestation of your imagination, and extension of who you are. this is kind of how trinitarians view jesus, they say that he and god are separate, yet the same which essentially equates jesus to a sock puppet.
- you could create a robot. not a complicated one mind you, but something more advanced than the sock puppet. it would be more advanced, but it wouldnt have freewill. it does what its programed to do and nothing more. but then its not really sharing the same existence as you is it? you cant really say that its in your image. this is most how people who believe in pre-destiny view it. if god punishes you for something, its because he wanted you to sin in the first place. this frankly makes no sense.
- your third option is to make a being like yourself, but separate. you design them with the basic operations, and then you let them learn for themselves and make their own decisions. but the problem this creation is that it inevitably creates the possibility (not in terms of probability but i mean it creates the ability) of rebellion. this means that your creation will be able to decide to go against your will. you look at time, and you realize in fact that this rebellion is an inevitability.
there is only one reason i can see that god would continue to create a creature with freewill even though he knows that some will definitely 100% rebel, and that is because he is absolutely sure that some wont.
he knew that adam and eve would sin, but he also knew that some of their offspring would be faithful. so he turns this entire rebellion into a lesson for the faithful.
Originally posted by Simplynoone
And yeah yeah I know I quoted from Paul again (get over it lol)..but I can see now why you have to toss his books out ..because Paul knew that he was not Christ nor god .....he was TOO HUMBLE for yall to comprehend............humble is not an easy thing to be ..I know that ...and even though Paul was full of the spirit of God and was bold and had the power of God in him with all authority ...HE REMAINED HUMBLE and did not count himself EQUAL TO GOD OR CHRIST >...he knew his place ...as we all should ....................
In my opinion we are not born dirty at all. Man is not an after-effect of a sin and therefore a sinner by default. People choose to punish themselves with such notions. We are powerful beings, and we don't need to be sold a rotten bill of goods to make us feel helpless and vile. What is the purpose of such things?
I know a woman who's brother was born premature and the mothers first response was to rush him to church for a baptism in case he died and ended up suffering for something he had no control over.
To me it's silly.
Realize that calling yourself of the flesh is about like playing a video game such as WoW, and then likening yourself as being your character in game. But it is not you, you are the consciousness/soul/spirit behind the character.
Hope that makes sense.
Originally posted by DJMessiah
reply to post by Deaf Alien
The "God created man in his image" is not meant to be taken literally. If we literally were made to look like God, we would all look the same - every one of us would look like a clone of another, with no distinction.
What the verse really means is that we were made with the same traits as God such as mercy, compassion, love, among others.
We are not considered demi-gods for having these traits, and neither are we responsible for the sin of parents, or our parent's parents, or great great great grandparents. If we were all responsible for their sins, then the amount of sins that equals up to our birth will be too vast an amount to outweigh our good deeds, making everyone destined for hell.
That means that if your child has a genetic disease, you are going to ignore it, right? I mean, after all, it isn't THEIR fault, so therefore (and according to your own logic) you can just ignore it, and not treat it. So, we can ignore ALL genetic diseases, because they don't need treatment, right? Do people even LEARN logical thinking anymore?