okay, I've read through the first few pages...same as always...
am I wrong in assuming that the rule that obama just overturned denied public funding to any group that discussed abortion as a possible choice for an
abortion under all circumstances?
I kind of think I am right here....and my assumption is being based on the fact that most of the abortion regulations that have been passed by the
federal and state governments have been shot down for the very same reason!
weather you like it or not, if a women comes into one of these clinics and the workers discover that this growth inside of her is going to cause her
severe physical problems....they have an obligation to discuss the alternatives with her...abortion being one of them!
If you're doctor had discovered a tumor growing inside you, would you prefer he sit down and discuss the various ways of getting rid of it, or would
you be okay if he just sat there and said, well, you have a tumor, and it's growing, and well, it's gonna kill you, but well, the federal laws
prohibit me from telling you what you can do about it......
as long as the people writing these stupid laws neglect the welfare of the mother's health, they will be shot down! They should be shot down!
just one case where the mother's right to good health was held as secondary to the baby's right to live. allow these stupid laws to remain on the
books, and well.....we will have the same problems here. women will die, women will be unnecessarily handicapped, because society has pooh-poohed her
you's might get further is you show a tad bit of concern for the mother and her wellbeing!
and, even with their laws, poland still has ships coming into ports, with the sole purpose of providing abortions to at least some of the women in the
[edit on 26-1-2009 by dawnstar]