Originally posted by stumason
Oh come on! 1000 "smacks"? What constitutes a smack? A clip round the ear or round the arse, or beating him with a belt or table leg? If it's the
former, than that is hardly worth killing your father (let alone the lodger) over is it? Regardless of his reasoning, the little turd should be
punished for killing the lodger at least.
Stop making excuses until the facts come out. It quite clearly is pre-meditated murder.
Canadianduder, why did you feel the need to say "If this was England, or another disarmed country - he never would have had a chance". One could say
that if this was England, then the father and his friend would still be alive and the child could call Social Services.
Is it not frightening that in a country awash with weapons that the child felt he had the right to kill someone because he was disciplined, rather
than call the Authorities like a civilised person?
ive been following this story for a while, i believe this is the same kid who had his questioning by authorities up on youtube when he didnt even have
a lawyer present
and you speak of calling social services in this case?
where was social services when he was being interviewed and questioned by authorities
children arent even allowed to be questioned or held without representation or adults present yet this young mans rights were taken away not only by
his father but also the authorities whom you suggest could have helped the young man before this act took place
you call the kid names
yet you in the same statement say wait till the facts come out before you make statements
yet you are here online talking crap about a kid whom you know nothing about
your statement disgusts me at the pure hypocrisy in which you write
you yourself claim to tell people to wait for the facts to come out before they make excuses and statements yet you in the same sentence make the
premeditated murder claim
in my view your post is absurd
i am going to be spending more time reading on this matter but as i viewed this thread and saw this post i had to address it
edited to fix the following statment and clearify
children arent even allowed to be questioned or held without representation or adults present yet this young mans rights were taken away not only by
his father but also the authorities whom you suggest could have helped the young man before this act took place
i mispoke in this statement when i claimed the father took away his rights, as that is just hearsay and we dont know that the child was truly abused
and those accusations are still just that as there isnt proof yet to my knowledge
[edit on 1-12-2008 by Dramey]