Boy 'killed father after 1,000 smacks', page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 07:25 AM by MacDonagh
reply to post by Benarius



It ain't that bad. Happened to me, and I turned out fine. All this "spanking is child abuse" arguing sounds like bellyaching to me.


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 07:31 AM by stumason
reply to post by Benarius



Undisciplined children are far more "damaged" than anything a clipped ear will give you.

Today, the streets are awash with kids who's parents wouldn't discipline them and now we have a youth crime wave in the UK. Didn't happen back in my day when parents were not scared of the PC brigade branding them child beaters just because they gave their child a slap.

And I don't see the need for the threats, really.

You think it's abuse, I do not. The Law agrees with me as it happens, so until the law is changed I shall use spanking, when necessary, which is very rarely.

You brand it as "emotional abuse" or whatever fluffy term you want, but isolation and deprivation are also "emotionally abusing", so you can't take the moral high ground.



reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 07:44 AM by whitewave
The difference between discipline and abuse?

Discipline is for the child's benefit.
Abuse is for the abuser's benefit.

If you perform a "corrective" action 1000 times without successfully correcting the problem, might you not try a different method?

I will usually hit "Control/Alt/Delete" about THREE times on my computer before realizing that particular trick is not working and switch to another method of fixing the glitch.

Even a cuff on the ear or swat on the bottom is only effective so many times. To even speak an unkind word 1000 times to a developing, impressionable mind is to instill and reinforce a negative outcome.

How many times were you told that George Washington was the first POTUS? Almost surely quite a bit less than 1000 times and yet it's a lesson that has stayed with you your entire life. If you were cursed 1000 times in 3000 days or hit (however lightly) 1000 times in 3000 days what life-long lesson would you take away from that?

Different methods work for different children. My oldest child was a social butterfly so grounding her for a few days was punishment enough. She was totally non-plussed by spanking. My second child preferred his own company so was unaffected by grounding or time out. Giving him the "mom" look while telling him how disappointed I was in his behavior was enough discipline. My youngest 2 children have only been spanked 2-3 in their lives and only when they were very young.

Spanking should be used as a tool, not a weapon and then, only rarely. Someone who raises their hand against another (especially a weaker one) 1000 times is probably not someone who has good impulse control or self-discipline. If the father lost his temper only 10% of the 1000 times then the child was "beaten" 100 times in his 8 years. Unacceptable.

I do have to ask, though; why was the lodger killed? Is there more to this story than what little has been presented? Has the boy been medically examined for signs of sexual abuse? Has any child pornography been found in the house? It's extremely disturbing to think that an 8 year old could be driven to take a human life for any reason.


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 08:41 AM by Benarius
reply to post by stumason



So then be it. I take you up for a challenge in the apropriate debate forum. "SPANKING IS CHILD ABUSE vs. SPANKING IS NOT CHILD ABUSE". I get the mods to set it up for us. Let me know when you're ready.


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 09:12 AM by Koka
Originally posted by Benarius
reply to
post by stumason



So then be it. I take you up for a challenge in the apropriate debate forum. "SPANKING IS CHILD ABUSE vs. SPANKING IS NOT CHILD ABUSE". I get the mods to set it up for us. Let me know when you're ready.


Do you think you can hold a debate without getting personal?

And remember you should at least ponder the statements of the indivdual you are debating, instead of just reacting.

[edit on 30-11-2008 by Koka]


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 09:50 AM by inthesticks
reply to post by stumason



clip round the ear

What exactly is a clip round the ear? Never heard that before.


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 09:53 AM by RogerT
Originally posted by stumason
reply to
post by Canadianduder



My partner on the other hand restricts her discipline to a mild telling off and empty threats, which the kids know she won't follow up on. When I am not there, they are terrors. When I am there, they behave. It's almost as if they have split personalities.

Kids are devious creatures and if you don't have wide range of tools, including spanking, and follow up on threats to employ them, you end up with horrible little turds.


So your kids have learned to fear you and mock your wife. Sounds like neither technique has worked too well.

At least with your technique you get what YOU want, until your kids are old enough to leave home. I'm sure you fully believe that what YOU want is the right thing, and what they want is 'wrong'. That takes a certain level of arrogance, but I've noticed from your posts over the years that isn't a quality you are lacking.

Personally I have never 'spanked' or physically threatened any of my kids. I just don't want to teach them the concept of bullying to get what they want.

I don't think they turned into 'horrible little turds', rather the opposite, but then I am the father so I'm biased

As for a child shooting his father and friend, that's just sad, and obviously one of the more negative aspects of a gun culture.

Clearly, by using violence to get what he wanted, the father taught the child a little too well.



reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 10:13 AM by stumason
reply to post by inthesticks




a clip around the ear hole.

to be struck upon the side of the head,most commonly by mothers to their young spawn after being bold boys

Some random link



reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 10:38 AM by stumason
reply to post by RogerT



Can't say I agree with your "analysis". I have found the best form of punishment is to deprive them of things they enjoy. As I have clearly stated several times here, I only give them a clip round the ear or a smacked arse rarely, but they know that I will if they continue to misbehave.

It may come as a shock to you, with your angelic little kids that you've obviously never had a problem with due to your excellent parenting skills (and you say I am arrogant), but sometimes reasoning with kids is a waste of time. Let me give you an example:

You go shopping with the children, they start to play up and run around the store, shouting or pulling things off shelves, you know the drill.

You ask them to behave, which they might do for all of 2 minutes. Then they start again, so you threaten them with a punishment, like no TV when you get home for example.

Now, while your out and about with 5 year olds they tend not to be too forward thinking. Your threat of no TV later has little impact, as they are not watching TV now, are they? You might threaten to remove something else instead, but whatever you do, it's likely to fall on deaf ears. There is little else you can threaten them with that has an immediate impact.

Now, if it was me in that situation, I would ask them first to behave. No joy? Ask again in a sterner manner. No joy again? Clip one round the ear as they run past. Enough to grab their attention and know you mean business, but certainly not enough to hurt them.

I have found on every occasion, a clip round the ear and a raised voice is far more effective at getting immediate compliance, rather than spending 20 minutes trying to "reason" with a hyperactive 5 year old, getting stressed in the process, having to remove god knows what when you get home and make sure you follow up on every threat of sanction you said.

Now, you may think that my kids "fear" me or don't respect my missus, but that is utter bollocks.

My daughter dotes on me, she clings to me like a limpet. She is always telling me how much she loves me, drawing me pictures and we play together and read often. She is just as loving with her mother.

The boy is less affectionate, as is the norm, but is a happy, bouncy lad who always wants to play. Sometimes he gets over excited and is usually the one to get the tellings off, but he is way ahead of his class in reading, writing and numeracy, so I am happy with the trade off in his slight misbehaviour for his excellent brain power.

What you interpret as them "fearing" me is incorrect. What the kids have learnt is to fear the consequences of their actions should they be doing wrong. They know I will follow through with my threats, which 95% of the time are the normal sanctions such as a grounding, no TV, removal of toys, which they then have to earn back. They don't just get them back the next day.

The problem with the missus is that she will not always follow through. Sometimes the lad will test her when she counts to three, to see if she will actually take away his spiderman toys. EVERY child will do that, they like to test boundaries to see how far they can go. Lately she has got better and we try to maintain a united front.

Anyway, the bottom line is I do not view a clip round the ear or a smacked bottom as "abuse". It has it's uses. The fact that you have made the gross mistake of assuming that is all I do, despite me having said otherwise just goes to show your out to try and gain some moral high ground, rather than actually listen to what I have said. Had you done so, then you would know that most of what you said was a crock of BS.

EDIT:

ANYWAY, THATS ME DONE ON THIS. I DO NOT WISH TO DERAIL THIS FURTHER

[edit on 30/11/08 by stumason]


reply posted on 30-11-2008 @ 11:30 AM by rcwj75
Bottom line...NOONE can make any judgments as to the forms of abuse until this child actually tells us what happened. NOONE on this board was there, NOONE on this board saw it happen, NOONE on this board knows anyone involved to get FIRSTHAND knowledge and FACTS...yet I read MANY posts by people who sure as heck act like they stood there everytime something went down and know the true details. Its kinda pathetic to jump to conclusions!!!

Is it sad that it happened yes....but when you have a child kill 2 people...you better raise an eyebrow and know what your talking about before opening your mouths!

reply to
post by stumason




After reading all 4 pages of this thread I must commend you and your ability to raise your kids the right way. For the canadian poster...you badmouth others for doing it THEIR way...my only thing to you is...you said you had to send them off to grandpa's when they got way out of hand...so obviously YOUR techniques don't work that often either, or you find it easier to push your problems off on others because you can't handle them yourself...so drop your "my way is the best/only way to raise kids" attitude!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 24 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 22 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 20 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 7 hours ago, 18 flags
Amazing French Indigo Girl in Africa (Tippi)
  Survival, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 124 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 98 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 11 hours ago, 64 replies