It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutlanderHuman24
IF you watched his recent 2009 videos with CAMELOT or whatever its called, he says he was wrong for giving out hard dates. It actually makes sense since the future is not written in stone. Like I can predict something that i would see to be the future now, but something can happen in a mere minute that would change the whole future that I saw.
Originally posted by BigfootNZ
The thing is, if he was making a prediction and some event before the prediction can alter that prediction then it isnt much of a prediction then is it?. Instead it just becomes a simple opinion on future events.
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by BigfootNZ
The thing is, if he was making a prediction and some event before the prediction can alter that prediction then it isnt much of a prediction then is it?. Instead it just becomes a simple opinion on future events.
Bingo!
You have unwittingly exposed why the OP is wrong. You are taking this notion of 'predictions' (with a supernatural flavour) which was introduced by the OP as if it was something Collier claims to be able to do accurately. He doesn't.
So you're right, if Collier says something will happen based on the data he has received, but he also says that the future is not fixed and can change and doesn't claim infallibility etc, then he isn't really making a "prediction" in the prophetic sense that the OP tries to suggest, is he?
Or as you put it "that's not much of a prediction". Quite right! But who said he was making such a "prediction"? THE OP! Not Collier.
It's the OP's red herring and you swallowed it.
[edit on 20-1-2010 by Malcram]
Originally posted by nutglow
I was one of those people who believed in this guy since he sounded genuinely fustrated and angry when talking about how the reptilians are kidnapping children for food.
But now, I'm not so sure anymore. Maybe this guy is a really, really good liar.
Originally posted by cripmeister
Collier "I can tell you this beyond a shadow of a doubt, absolute proof positive inside of myself because I've been shown it, in eight years southern California will be eight islands."
That's exactly what he said, it's a prediction. If you can't agree on that well then you're just desperate.
Predictions - Quotes
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." -- Thomas Watson (1874-1956), Chairman of IBM, 1943
"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." -- Lord Kelvin, President, Royal Society, 1895
"Everything that can be invented has been invented." -- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899
"Inventions reached their limit long ago, and I see no hope for further development." -- Julius Frontinus, 1st century A.D.
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977
"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876.
""The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" -- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s.
"Space travel is bunk." -- Sir Harold Spencer Jones, Astronomer Royal of Britain, 1957, two weeks before the launch of Sputnik
"All attempts at artificial aviation are not only dangerous to life but doomed to failure from an engineering standpoint." -- editor of 'The Times' of London, 1905
"Louis Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous fiction". -- Pierre Pachet, Professor of Physiology at Toulouse, 1872
"I confess that in 1901, I said to my brother Orville that man would not fly for fifty years . . . Ever since, I have distrusted myself and avoided all predictions." -- Wilbur Wright, 1908
"Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." -- Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy, Ecole Superieure de Guerre
"The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon". -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon- Extraordinary to Queen Victoria 1873
"You would make a ship sail against the winds and currents by lighting a bonfire under her deck...I have no time for such nonsense." -- Napoleon, commenting on Fulton's Steamship
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949
"Man will never reach the moon regardless of all future scientific advances." -- Dr. Lee De Forest, inventor of the Audion tube and a father of radio, 25 February, 1967.
"The aeroplane will never fly." -- Lord Haldane, Minister of War, Britain, 1907
"Within the next few decades, autos will have folding wings that can be spread when on a straight stretch of road so that the machine can take to the air." -- Eddie Rickenbacker, 'Popular Science,' July 1924
"But what ... is it good for?" -- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
"I would like to address the predictions or prophetic accuracy. First off the Zenetae Andromedan's are a very scientific race. So they know that the future is not set in stone, but is real since they come from the future. Alex does not refer to information that they have told him to share of future events as anything but probability. Not prophetic and not predictions! By probability they recognize that events can be change before and even as they take place by those are involved. They would explain this in terms of percentages of probability.... The future is not set because of such. Anyone anytime can change their mind" - JON ROBINSON regarding Collier
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by Malcram
This would only be logical if Collier claimed to be a prophet and to be capable of predicting a static future.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
reply to post by Malcram
There is one huge difference between Collier and the group of individuals you listed, as well as any scientist who may be proven wrong. Want to take a crack at what that difference is?
Originally posted by Malcram
This would only be logical if Collier claimed to be a prophet and to be capable of predicting a static future.
Collier may not say he is a prophet, but when he says things like... "I can tell you this beyond a shadow of a doubt, absolute proof positive inside of myself because I've been shown it, in eight years southern California will be eight islands..." he sure is behaving like one.
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by Malcram
Collier has been shown this by his ET friends, religious prophets are also shown things by God and by angels.
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by Malcram
The phenomena is the same but for contactees it's the ETs that bring the gospel.
Originally posted by Malcram
LOL I was waiting for someone to come up with this particular stock fallacy. But I'm a little surprised that it comes from you. Your fallacies are usually far superior and far more expertly applied.
Originally posted by Malcram
I can think of many 'differences', but they are simply not relevant to this discussion. What is relevant is that they all stridently predicted things which did not come true, as did Collier.
Originally posted by Malcram
Or do you feel that people who you don't respect should have to play by different, much harsher rules and bear much heavier consequences for any failed predictions than people in professions you happen to admire? It seems so.
Originally posted by Malcram
You have no trouble discerning that their inflexible and insistent predictions are not the hallmarks of people actually claiming to be prophets, I presume?
Originally posted by Malcram
I could just as easily say that when surgeon Sir John Eric Ericksen said "The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon"...
But that would be a bit silly, right?
Originally posted by Malcram
And again, you are cherry picking his comment and not taking it in the context of the belief system in which Collier made it - a belief system which actually precludes the interpretation that he was somehow attempting to 'prophesy' events in a static future, as if he believed he could do so.
Originally posted by Malcram
How is it 'the same'?
Let's cut the BS - there is an attempt here to insinuate that ET contact is exactly the same as professed supernatural contact between prophets and their gods.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
You are failing, purposefully and out-right refusing to recognize this, because it involves one of your sacred cows.
[edit on 21-1-2010 by DoomsdayRex]
If Collier was saying god or angels were giving him prophecies, would you be so quick to defend him or do it so vehemently?
Originally posted by Wertdagf
You cant stop him... hes going to lie to a billion more people and use the money to wipe his #$%.
There are to many delusional people whos desires are making them see things that arent there. They want a God, a heaven, and magical powers. They will fight tooth and nail to halucinate and fabricate its proof of existance so that they can sleep well at night.
And when the day comes that these things are erased and known as the fairytales they are those who wanted nothing more than to live in a magical world with the things mentioned above... will choose to fade to black.
["Imagine""The Happening"]
[edit on 21-1-2010 by Wertdagf]
Originally posted by Malcram
You're doing exactly what I said you and others were doing. You're trying to conflate religious experiences and supernatural claims of contact with God and angels with the ET and contactee phenomenon so that the latter can be dismissed as easily as the former. They are not the same.
Originally posted by Malcram
So let's hear this 'huge fundamental difference' which justifies this bias.
Originally posted by Malcram
They don't claim to be infallible prophets in contact with all-knowing deities, yet they made outrageous predictions with extreme confidence, and neither does Collier, yet he made such a prediction too. So?