It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Speaking of cherry picking, you purposefully ignored where I stated it is not an indictment of the UFO phenomenon as a whole.
And yes, they are the same. They receive a message from on-high...
You would be very hard pressed to tell us the difference between prophesying contactees and those experiencing similar religious phenomenon.
You don't even realize that you yourself are treating Collier differently, applying a double-standard wherein Collier is excused.
The difference is that everyone in the examples you cited are wrong and Collier is never wrong. Those scientists and experts are unequivocally wrong. They would have to acknowledge this, as would any supporters. No excuses are being made. However, Collier and his supporters never acknowledge he is wrong.
So, the difference between Collier and those previously listed who made failed predictions - the difference you suggested was relevant to We have witnessed six pages, post after post of excuses. Collier's supporters have performed amazing feats of logical contortions, trying convince us Collier is right by virtue of being wrong.
Collier may not say it in such explicit terms, but he behaves that way. His followers and supporters, including you, treat him as such...
Whenever his predictions do not come to pass, it is not because he or his alien friends are wrong but for whatever variety of excuses. Collier and his alien friends are never wrong in the eyes of his followers and supporters.
Originally posted by Malcram
No, I was dealing with that when I said you were again doing what I had pointed out earlier - trying to conflate the supernatural and the world of angels and prophets with claims of ET contact.
You would be very hard pressed to tell us the difference between prophesying contactees and those experiencing similar religious phenomenon.
Originally posted by Malcram
Strange, as I seem to have spent several posts explicitly doing exactly that, while you have come up with precisely nothing to prove your claim that they are the same - other than that they both come from "on high" (Do spiritual beings actually live 'on high' in the sky?').
Originally posted by Malcram
That you refuse to acknowledge the vast difference between claims of encountering flesh and blood beings from other planets with access to greatly advanced technology and the world of prophets and angels is ridiculous.
Originally posted by Malcram
Nope, and I note you don't mention how. In fact my argument has consistently been that they should be treated exactly the same.
Originally posted by Malcram
Don't try to conflate Collier with the posts of members. He's not responsible for them. This is about Collier. Stick to the subject.
Originally posted by Malcram
As I thought, you introduce a supposed difference which, even if it were true, is absolutely irrelevant to the discussion of whether or not Collier should be seen as completely discredited because of failed predictions, when others who did so are not, or whether or not Collier was acting as a prophet, when others who made outrageous predictions are not accused of this. Absolutely irrelevant.
Originally posted by Malcram
Ahhhh, so Collier should be completely discredited, all his claims of contact should be dismissed and everything he said should be ignored because some ATS members supposedly made excuses for him?
Originally posted by Malcram
I've never argued Collier was 'right'. I've referred to it as a failed prediction. But what I won't accept is distortions and hypocrisy about what his failed predictions supposedly signify. They don't signify very much at all. He never claimed to be a prophet of a static future.
Originally posted by Malcram
Rubbish. You're misrepresenting people - myself, certainly. I've repeatedly said his prediction was wrong - just as those listed were also wrong.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Do you not understand what a figure-of-speech is?
At no point have you told us how the two are different beyond window-dressing; what is the difference between Collier and religious prophets beside who they are getting their prophecies from?
That is exactly what Collier does. You yourself have used his words and logic on this very matter to defend him. You use his same excuses, telling us over and over why his prophecies are unfalsifiable; your above post is full of them. So do not tell us Collier doesn't do this...This is his excuse. This is nothing more than an attempt to make his predictions unfalsifiable.
You have done this multiple times in this thread, attempting to make it about us instead of Collier.
And you've told us repeatedly why he isn't really wrong.
You've shown that if someone mentions the word "aliens" you will vehemently defend them without a thought.
Originally posted by Reevster
Question the things you do on a daily bases and ask yourself , does this feel right?
Why do we buy cheap clothing at say wallmart knowing that some 8 to 12 year olds working in a sweat shop in another country getting paid peanuts or less . Does this feel right to you?
Why do we walk past the homeless and pretend we dont see them. Does this feel right to you?
Why are we fighting in unjust wars. Does this feel right to you?
Why is nasa covering up pictures or blurring portions of them of the moon and mars. Does this feel right to you?
Ask yourself questions and be honest with your self , dont let your ego take over . Just because your were taught that something is a certain way most of your life does not mean its the only way, or even really true.
Open your minds.
Originally posted by Diplomat
Oh, and events cease to happen all because 1 single small little carbon human unit spoke about them? That's a stretch.
Originally posted by NightVision
Originally posted by Diplomat
I notice a lot of people on this board blindly believe Alex Collier's BS for some reason. The only evidence for believing that I ever see is stuff like "Well he really SEEMS like he is telling the truth, " or "He doesn't SEEM like he's lying." lol, gimme a break...
At first it might seem that you have presented a valid inquiry into Alex Collier's off the mark predictions, however your assessment of Alex Collier as a fraud has some flaws in some areas and strengths in others:
Strengths:
A) Not all of Alex's predictions have come true
B) Lack of physical evidence to back his claims of contact
C) Lack of eye witness testimony to substantiate his contacts.
Weaknesses:
A) Alex Collier has nothing for sale and to date has given less than 5 lectures.
B) Alex openly admits before your posted youtube video that the audience is free to disbelieve, in fact, he gives the disclaimer before every lecture.
C) Historically, many predictions have been given so that they can be avoided. It is not yet known whether this method works.
----------------------
As a skeptic, it is your responsibility to look at both sides of a case without bias. Given your immediate willingness to hurl names and insults, it is clear to me, that you simply (at this point) lack the investigative skills to quietly observe both sides of a case before making a determination. Therefore, your final conclusions cannot hold weight under true skeptical inquiry.
[edit on 26-8-2008 by NightVision]