It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnsky
Any country that uses nuclear weapons as a first strike option automatically becomes the lowest form of scum on the face of the earth.
Lower than Saddam, Hitler, Stalin, or any other lowlife you could ever imagine.
Originally posted by jheated6
JFJ I like your approach to the subject but their is a big problem with it, you're making the assumption all people think like you...
Using Germany as a metaphor with Nazi's was a bad example because a lot of time when I hear about what happened in WW2 all I hear about is Germany as a whole. People like to generalize to associate a place with an event, so either way you look at it people are going to think that America and their citizens are behind it.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by mybigunit
Thanks - that's a nice pie graph of federal receipts. But it doesn't answer my question. My question is important because you stated there would be no change in the current tax rate for corps.
And that big BLUE chunk of pie....what about that? You willing to give that up?
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by mybigunit
You want a tip on how to deal with SS? Privatize it over time, as Bush suggested.
Otherwise states will implement it differently, and you'll have a bunch of angry boomers on your hands. And you do not want that problem.
Originally posted by jsobecky
As a first strike option, I agree. This is why the crazies in charge of Iran must not be permitted to build or buy nukes. It's bad enough that countries like Pakistan and North Korea have them.
Originally posted by mybigunit
reply to post by jsobecky
Did you not read above WE PAY COPORATE TAXES NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The tax % would not change and corporations would see a BOOM in business because the people will have more money in their pocket to spend. [edit on 6-7-2008 by mybigunit]
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by johnsky
Any country that uses nuclear weapons as a first strike option automatically becomes the lowest form of scum on the face of the earth.
Lower than Saddam, Hitler, Stalin, or any other lowlife you could ever imagine.
And as such, any country that dares to do something as disgusting as using nuclear weapons as a first strike option must be destroyed.
There's no question about it, no options, that nation, whoever they are cannot be trusted to remain part of this earth.
I really hope the US, once a leader in freedom and democracy, wouldn't dare even imagine using nukes as a first strike option.
I'm not a praying man, but if I were, I'd pray no nation would ever consider such an option. It would become every mans duty on earth to ensure of that nations removal from this planet.
There is a difference between The Nation and The administration. I don't know of ANYONE who thinks bombing Iran in ANY capacity to be a good idea. The VAST MAJORITY of Americans are peaceful people who are not interested in conflicts. So my point is that our NATION would not launch a first strike against Iran but our ADMINISTRATION might. Would you convict all Germans because of what some nazi's did?
Originally posted by zealman
I wouldn't be so sure about that my friend. It would come down to a nuclear exchange in the end. Ever heard of the MAD ( Mutually Assured Destruction policy) ? There are no winners in a nuclear war only losers who wished they were'nt so arrogant as to think they could actually win. You can have all the conventional weapons you want, that wont stop the carnage and destruction caused by the nukes, and people's lack of will to fight when they can't get safe food to eat and water to drink.
Russia is currently building the most sophisticated nuclear weapon systems the West has ever caught wind of. The Topol 4 missile has multiple decoys that can duck and weave incoming ordenance. The U.S's Anti Ballistic Missile System wether it be ship - bourne or land based is far from reliable. One article I read described the ABMS as like trying to shoot a bullet out of the sky with another bullet, so it's not that simple.
The Russians have stealth and laser weapon systems incorporated into both ships and air craft as well.
Arrogant thinking such as yours will be the downfall of your country.
Originally posted by InterWeb
DEBUNKED!
Using the words “attractive British women" and "Sarah Ferguson" in the same sentence has to be a lie.
Oh and then this: posted by you just before two saturdays ago.
Congressman Ron Paul has warned millions of radio listeners that the US is heading into a deadly confrontation with Iran, revealing his disbelief at members of Congress who have openly voiced support for a pre-emptive nuclear strike on the country...
"...Most of them will say “I agree with you on all you say but the Iranians are bad people and they might attack us some day… I hear members of Congress saying ‘if we could only nuke them’.”
This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills go first to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills never make it out of committee.