It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
www.infowars.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Congressman Ron Paul has warned millions of radio listeners that the US is heading into a deadly confrontation with Iran,
What if it is Iran that is heading into a deadly confrontation with the U.S.A.?
What has Iran done to avoid this confrontation? It seems they have done more to raise the risk of confrontation than the U.S. has.
Who the hell is Ron Paul anyway?
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by jtma508
there are protests all over. in DC especially. but you wont see them on the news. I have been to a few and the mysteriously were not mentioned on news media. Wonder how that works? Hmmm
Originally posted by TKainZero
The truth is...
From about 2003... It has looked like we have wanted to attack Iran....
5 years later... the only thing that has changed, is the little hitler is doing some saber-rattling, and the Isrealis seem more motivated to attack Iran then we are...
My opinon, ive thought since 2003, that War with Iran was the next thing, i thought that the US would roll thier troops out of Iraq, and into Iran for a while...
the one thing that changed is that iran opened the IRAN OIL BOURSE on kish island. it opened in febuary,youknow,back when we cut the internet lines to iran? ahmadinejad opened this new oil market based on the euro dollar rather than the US dollar
facts about the oil bourse
the idea is that along with a few other major oil producing countries they could crash the dollar. do a date comparison of oil prices since it opened. also this bourse has been planned and delayed many times. amadinejah has stated that his version of nuking the US didnt involve bombs anymore it was attacking the american economy.
guess he figured it was on it's knees,might as well cut off its head. so just like whan saddam said no more dollars,and suddenly had weapons of mass destruction,so will iran follow the worm. remember the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED sign on the aircraft carrier? well the mission was to oust saddam and install a pro western government that would stay with the dollar funny how that all happened just at the time when the euro passed the dollar in value.
the current administration will never admit it, but the weapon of mass destruction is the euro and the target is our MONEY.
FOLLOW THE TRAIL AND THERES ALWAYS MONEY AT THE END.
WHY HASNT ANYONE ON HERE MENTIONED THIS,AND REALIZED THAT THE TOWERS WENT DOWN SO WE COULD POSITION OURSELVES ON BOTH SIDES OF IRAN. funny how the war on terror stopped right there in iraq and afghanistan,isn't it?
it was lucky for us that all the terrorist went straight back to their own countries and we contained them there!! but i'm sure it was a coincidence.
heres another little story to put in your puzzle box,it will give you an outline of what happened ,but it is much more involved than what is written in this article. i read years ago that the taliban said no to this deal after being wooed in texas. it says the US WAS OPPOSED TO THE PIPELINE ,BUT THAT STATEMENT IS FALSE. YOU WILL FIND THIS OUT IF YOU RESEARCH ITFURTHER
PROPOSED OIL LINE THRU AFGHANISTAN,DEAL WITH TALIBAN(or could be called "how to make an instant terrorist)
and gee wiz.....you never hear about this stuffin msm
Originally posted by bigbert81
I am beginning to fear that this war with Iran is fast becoming inevitable.
We're in for a world of trouble, especially when the people who get to make the laws get to profit from them too.
Originally posted by jsobecky
But I'm also for a strong national defense. And that needs to be financed via taxes
Originally posted by jsobecky
But the thing that really bothers me, and the thing that has kept him out of the running, is the association with Alex Jones and such people.
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
reply to post by tezzajw
You are not wrong, however you have taken something from my post out of context. In my opinion Ron Paul is a lame duck, yet still attracts support for what appears to be a wasted viral campaign, one which he stands no chance of winning, so what is the point?
The point was to restore constitutional government and his campaign has moved into that area and that is the reason he gains more and more support.
To deflect people from issues that are important and from those candidates who do have the best chance of winning, or to spread disinformation, further distance those who are truly seeking change from where they have a real chance to make a difference?
perhaps some people want real change instead of the same thing we've had for the last hundred years.Perhaps some people care about thier freedoms.
Perhaps some people realise our officals no longer pay any attention to our voices.Some people are willing to research just what these people vote for and if it is constitutional.
and what difference are you talking about?The taking of the peoples money in a different area?And what change?Neither I nor the american people need
change that takes away more freedoms and that is what ron pauls campaign was and continues to be about.
Originally posted by mybigunit
It is inevitable and there is nothing the people are going to do about it. The propaganda machine has worked on the 99% population so this will go through and we informed ones will have to sit back and sigh in disgust. Im telling you man ignorance really is bliss. I sometimes want to give up all my knowledge just so I can be a sheeple like the rest of these people.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Originally posted by jsobecky
But the thing that really bothers me, and the thing that has kept him out of the running, is the association with Alex Jones and such people.
I agree with you on him being in association with Alex Jones. But that doesn't change his policies. That doesn't change the fact that he is the best hope for this country.