It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by StellarX
So given the following options, what do you think is the greatest control-tool? (Im looking for a ranking).
* Control of money
* Control of resources/supplies
* Control of media/information
Which of these streams exercise power over the other? Of course they are interdependent, but who would you think has the final say?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
So given the following options, what do you think is the greatest control-tool? (Im looking for a ranking).
* Control of money
* Control of resources/supplies
* Control of media/information
Which of these streams exercise power over the other? Of course they are interdependent, but who would you think has the final say?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The whole idea of "conspiracy-theory" is (only in my opinion of course) of religious origin and begins with the following tricky phrase:
The angels of darkness will appear as angels of light
I dont know if anyone can conceive of how much harm this single piece of thinking has caused in the world.
The mentality calls us to suspect evil where there is good, suspect evil when someone calls for peace.
Its the slogan of those who have had their trust broken.
And that, imo, lies behind the christian idea that "new age" (something which I believe is on its way into our world) is evil.
"The Illuminati" are "the enlightened ones" - forces of progress, goodwill and enlightenment.
Originally posted by Shadowflux
I like your ideas and theories OP and it touches on something I've been thinking about after reading a lot of socialist and nihilist philosophies. Perhaps the "Illuminati" or whatever they wish to call themselves are in fact acting in the best interest of the human species as a whole but I don't believe they're acting in the good of the individiual.
Take, for instance, the reduction of world population to about 10% of the current population. When I truly thought about it, pondered it free of outside thought, I realized it might be an ideal, a vertibale utopia for both man and nature.
Resources would be easier to come by and more effort and resources could be directed to scientific advancement.
Health would improve, health care would be universal, economics would never fail, the list truly goes on. However, there is the small issue of getting that 90% population reduction to happen.
I think this is the fundamental issue between our perception of good and evil. There is a praradox of sorts that exists due to the inherant intangability of the term "evil". It would seem logically conclusive that one may practice "evil" as a means to attain "good". For instance, if someone decided to commit armed robbery on multiple occasions he would be deemed a criminal yet if he took his loot and spread it among the improverished single mothers of his neighborhood he would be branded as doing "good".
I think the main flaw in your argument would be the fact that "good" and "evil" are entirely subjective and not accountable to any exterior objective deffinition.
In other words, "evil" is just what you as a person deem to be evil based upon your own beliefs of what is "good". It is your beliefs and your position in the world that makes you deem one thing good and one thing evil.
When we are talking about concepts such as "The Illuminati" and "NWO" we have to keep in mind the subjective relativity of "good" and "evil".
Perhaps those that are illuminated do not believe they are doing wrong and are in fact working for the ultimate survival of humanity as a species in a multi-planet or galactic wide future. However, to acheive this ultimate utopia certain sacrifices must be made, people have to die, buildings must be destroyed and old concepts of thought and philosophy must be abandonned.
Much like when a child recieves a shot from the doctor, we must do harm to the child in order to protect his or her future even if the child itself is incapable of understanding our need to cause him pain.
I think this is where the perception of the "Illuminati" as "evil" comes from. It is the fact that as children we can't see the bigger picture, we can't understand why there must be pain and suffering even if we want that same utopia they're offering.
Take for instance the rebellous southern states during the American Civil War, they viewed the northern act of withdrawing slavery from their economy as evil and wrong yet the northern states felt the same in reverse in regards to southern slavery.
Take also the Nazis, who believed they were doing good and felt it was their duty to eliminate all genetically inferior peoples yet we don't have to look far to find an account of how evil the Nazis were.
This fact works in the microcosm as well. Any outside force that we are powerless to stop and that we deem to be acting against our best interest is deemed "evil" in differing degrees.
The drug dealers on the street are "evil" but not as "evil" as the rapist who in turn is not as "evil" as the serial killer.
In fact, I would venture to guess that it is easier to find a commonality of opinion when labeling things "evil" than if we were labeling things "good". There are many regional differences within America alone let alone the regional, religious, political, and philosophical differences throughout the world. When these differences are all taken into account it seems quite obvious that there is no way we can concretely determin what is in fact "evil" and what is in fact "good".
I perosnally believe the understanding of the inherent non-existance of such terms and ideas as "good" and "evil" is one major part of what we would deem "Illumination".
It is the understanding of the whole true picture, not the microcosmic but the macrocosmic, it is the considering of every aspect even in decisions that seem to effect only a small part. I believe they know that most people are unwilling and incapable of abandonning all the belief structures and political theories they've worked so hard to use as a foundation of their own perception of the self.
Most people are unwilling to abandon the concept of self and take up the concept of true communitiy and commonaltiy of purpose.
Most people are incapable of living in true equality with anyone, even those that share the same ideaologies.
This is why secrecy is necessitated, because most people will deem as "evil" that which they do not understand and most people are completely incapable of truly understanding the actions and goals of the "Illuminati"
Based upon what I've said so far I would be willing to go so far as to label the majority of human actions and opinions as "evil" since they contribute almost nothing to the betterment of the world as a whole, lead to no greater understanding of the world or people around us and serve only to further isolate all of us from both eachother and our true purpose here in existance.
Humans will always seek to label, to seperate, to segregate, to organize, and categorize everything they see and experience
which will always lead to further inability to live a connected, complete, whole existance with the planet and the people around us and will almost certainly sentence us to obliteration in the face of such problems as the inevitable neccesity to leave this planet and become citizens of a connected universe.
I beleive the first step to illumination is the rejection of concepts such as "good" and "evil", religion, politics, moraltiy, societal norms and groupthink
The path to true illumination is walked alone in darkness until one can truly find one's own path to illumination where you will realize your true purpose for existence and you will see the actions of the world with new vision and understand them more fully than you could have hoped for before. Only in darkness can one find true illumination.