AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


Leaked images of Nibiru orbited by Planet X taken by South Pole Station Telescope


<<  23    24    25    26    27    28    29  >>



reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 12:55 PM by Anonymous ATS


reply to post by WhiteWash



The stars in our Galaxy (Milky Way) orbit a central spot believed to be a super-massive black hole. They orbit due to the gravatational pull of the therorised black hole, it is just like the gravitational pull our star has on the planets in our solar system, keeping them in orbit, but on a much larger scale a time frame.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 01:05 PM by xoxo stacie


Oye I am so going to get bashed for this... you can see it at sunrise from the southern most tip of africa. I know the person who put out the pics of it and they are real. In all the pics he took it was right along side the sun at its rising and could be seen with the naked eye till about noonish.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 02:18 PM by ngchunter


reply to post by xoxo stacie



If it's alongside the sun, you don't have to be at the southern tip of africa to see it, you could be anywhere in the world and see it eventually. I saw it at sunrise this morning too, it was the planet mercury. That and the crescent moon are the only things rising just before the sun right now. Here's a picture:
farm4.static.flickr.com...

[edit on 27-10-2008 by ngchunter]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 10:32 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 10:46 AM by booda


dont know if this has been posted or if you have seen it before....

I followed this myself and what this guy says is real....you need to download and install Microsoft Worlwide telescope and follow this guide...

uk.youtube.com...

interesting discovery.....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 01:03 PM by ngchunter


reply to post by booda



Can't view youtube atm, could anyone post a screenshot? Sounds like another google sky "missing panel" in some well-studied part of the sky again. I don't know why people bother to make videos about this when static screenshots are the more appropriate medium, but I guess it's just to get attention on youtube.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 06:22 PM by booda


Originally posted by ngchunter
reply to post by booda



Can't view youtube atm, could anyone post a screenshot? Sounds like another google sky "missing panel" in some well-studied part of the sky again. I don't know why people bother to make videos about this when static screenshots are the more appropriate medium, but I guess it's just to get attention on youtube.


Yes and no....something is missing but when you change the filters..something really bright shows up....bed now but Ill try do it tomorrow....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 08:55 AM by ngchunter


reply to post by booda



Is it this thing again?

If it is, it's just a regular planet, venus I believe, which happened to get caught in an IRIS image used to make the google sky and WWT IR maps, but wasn't there when the optical surveys were done. That's why it only shows up when you "change filters" and it's also why it just happens to be sitting on the ecliptic line perfectly. You have to remember that neither are real telescopes, they're just compositions of previously conducted sky surveys and they were not recorded simultaneously.

[edit on 25-11-2008 by ngchunter]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 11:36 AM by nny4n


I think this planet x stuff is a marketing ploy for the up and coming film 2012 coming out in the cinema's soon.

They did the same marketing tactics for the blair witch project back then before release. Does anyone remember?

i may be wrong i may be right we just have to wait and see.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 11:39 AM by RFBurns


As with any of this stuff, you can take it for what it is, or blow it off as a fabrication.

Some interesting and pretty pictures tho.

What blew the credibility off of the video on the first page, was the disclaimer at the end..."oh I cant tell you who I am or when I will release more pictures"...blah blah blah.

It would have been better to not say anything at all!!!!



Cheers!!!!!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 08:03 AM by booda


reply to post by ngchunter



that seems to make sense - never thought of the ecliptic line...thanks for the education...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 06:44 PM by Anonymous ATS


Any who doubt the validity of niburu only need to look into the sumerian writings, they knew so much about the procession of the equinox' and other stellar events any thinking person has to conclude that they were taught these things. The "great year" is almost thirty thousand years long, yet they were privvy to this knowledge. We only in the last hundred and fifty years or so found the existance of neptune and uranus, not to mention pluto, yet the sumerians knew of these things and even recorded the color of the planets. Research things yourself, dont listen to anyone else, come to your own conclusions. I believe any intelligent people will come to a similiar way of thought. It would explain the missing link, how we came to be made in our creators image, all covered in 5000 year old writings. Seems a bit close to the truth for coincidence.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 05:54 PM by NavalFC


niburu isnt real head over to badastronomy.com they have a whole section on it.

If niburu was real, and follows the path given by it believers, it would be the brighest object in the Night sky



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 06:04 PM by ydfocknowledgeseeker


to me it looks like 2 dots on photoshop with some words of fear so u will belive in it

how long ago was jesus and for that matter sumerains?

sorry timelines change since 100,000 years 25,000 years etc what if the annukaki died out? who knows what can change in that time period and if it is coming what are we going to do about spend trillions of dollars to build cities underground? sorry our tax dollars are well spent across the world they are set.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 04:37 AM by Zahhar


reply to post by WhiteWash



Well there's two primary ways that come to mind. One, Sol and another star began as orbiting accretion disks. In fact, the gravity of one could affect the accretion process of the other. Two, Sol catches a smaller star and its planetary system into its orbit.

The second idea appeals more to me somehow. If our solar system was in a binary orbit with another star without our being able to observe it directly, it would have to be a pretty small star--the smallest of red dwarfs even. Dim little suckers, and long lived. There are supposed millions upon millions of them out there, wandering our galactic plane with us, too dim to register on our land or space based telescopes.

The planetary system of such a star might be no broader than two or three times the orbital reach of Jupiter's moons, which would allow it to pass through Sol's orbital plane without hitting or even necessarily affecting much of anything. But that star would be dragging its own load of stuff around, it's heliosphere, it's cloud of crap, it's comets and asteroids. Any one of these or any part of one of these could jump orbits and join our own little family of debris.

Could also make an interesting theory for explaining how Neptune's pole got knocked atilt, if a red dwarf whipped by her one day close enough to throw her off and tangle her moons into spaghetti orbits.

Well, it's fun speculating.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 04:52 AM by detachedindividual


This is odd, I swear I saw it officially mentioned a couple of times that there is another large planet that we are unable to locate.

In the discussion I saw they mentioned that there are certain behaviors in our system that all suggest that there is another large mass, on an elliptical orbit, and that it will likely come into view in the following few years.

I assume they were talking about the same thing?

I thought it was well known scientific fact that there was another planet that we haven't seen yet, and I'm certain I saw this on the BBC in an interview with a spokesman of a leading agency.

I'm going to have to go off and start searching for links now



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:14 AM by Waldy


reply to post by Zahhar



Interesting theory but Im afraid it holds no water, the gravitational effects of another system so close would have prevented the formation of our solarsystem as it is. The planets would not have the perfect round orbits they have because they would be pulled slightly towards the other system.

Also two solarsystems simply can not form within each other or co-exist like you are suggesting. A red dwarf that close orbiting would "steal" the oort clout from our sun.

The binary system you are suggesting is possible but it would result in elliptical orbits of the planets and possibly create small planet sized comets. It would be very chaotic from the start and earth as we know it would never have formed even.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:28 AM by Waldy


reply to post by detachedindividual



There was a group of Japanese dudes that theorized based on their computer model that there might be another planet in the far outskirts of the solarsystem. It is due to their model lacks a mass in that area to resemble 4 billion years of simulation. It is far fetched to say the least, it is 30% of the earths mass and is not necessary one body but could be thousands of asteroids. Elliptical orbit is the norm that far out, the "shell" around us is tear shaped and egg shaped orbits on the edge is nothing to worry about.



   copyright & usage 


<<  23    24    25    26    27    28    29  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.007 seconds
Page processed in 0.177 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.