Originally posted by Sky watcher
The UCJM prevents any of this and there are many American Muslims in the army. Any commander would have the drill instructor tossed in the brig and
court Martial for laying one hand on any recruits head.
Just to keep things balanced, I'd like to point out that I served in the United States Marine Corps, and I can tell you that some drill instructors
DO strike recruits (although they prefer subtler methods). They can get away with depriving you of food and sleep and they know how to justify it.
They will pair the worst recruits with MCMAP partners who will jack them up.
If that doesn't do the trick, they'll come up behind you while you're marching and pick your leg up from behind the knee so fast that the first
thing to hit the ground will be your shoulder blades, and their story will be that you weren't lifting your knees and you stumbled when they
corrected you. I've seen it.
To be fair, though, only once did I ever see a drill instructor just haul off and deliver a closed fist to a recruit, and he had his bases covered on
that one. The recruit had committed a serious offense that would have resulted in an NJP and almost certainly an administrative separation. The DI
gave him a stiff shot that knocked the wind out of him and told him they can get eachother discharged or they can keep our dang mouths shut like grown
men.
On the other hand, none of the abuse I saw in training, physical or otherwise, ever appeared to be based on anything other than the recruit's
performance. The goal usually seemed to be to provoke recruits who were deficient yet passing into refusing to train, or in some cases sabotaging them
so that they would fail critical training events such as PFTs, rifle qual, MCMAP tests, or "prac". Rarely was such abuse non-continuous and thus
more likely to be punitive or corrective in nature.
I will also say that I went through boot with a Muslim recruit. He was a dang good recruit, and the treatment he recieved reflected that. As a matter
of fact he was a squad leader and recieved a meritorious promotion. That doesn't mean there is no prejudice, but any prejudice which might exist is
obviously not institutional.