It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by mrsdudara
I have to say, Im impressed.
This was an amazingly fair sentencing.
Seriously?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
You know better then that Intrepid, she should be set free,
Why the head games?
What "head games"? They screwed up and they are saving face by giving her a token sentence. Better than the alternative imo.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by mrsdudara
I have to say, Im impressed.
This was an amazingly fair sentencing.
Seriously?
You would prefer that she be physically beaten? Or imprisoned for 6 months?
This was an amazingly fair sentencing.
They screwed up and they are saving face by giving her a token sentence. Better than the alternative imo.
Originally posted by planetfall
you cant apply western sensibilities toward this culture, everyone thinks they're just like us and they are not. always the same mistake.
Originally posted by Freeborn
I would have prefered that she had not been arrested for such a silly misunderstanding and that she had been allowed to get on with what she wanted to do which is educate children, something she can't be bad at as she is popular with both children and parents.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
How big of them, maybe I would have respected them if they publicly apologized to her, and set her free.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by planetfall
Ok, when in Rome.....
Does that apply to Muslims who live in Western countries?
islam comes first above all else. most especially before the welfare of women and children,
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
How big of them, maybe I would have respected them if they publicly apologized to her, and set her free.
And there would still be some here bitching that she was arrested in the first place.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by planetfall
Of course I understand that perfectly well.
Doesn't mean to say that I have to like it and accept it and it doesn't mean that I won't speak out against it.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by planetfall
Of course I understand that perfectly well.
Doesn't mean to say that I have to like it and accept it and it doesn't mean that I won't speak out against it.
Originally posted by Sparky63
I do not know of any passage (surrah) in the Koran that forbids naming an animal or object "Muhammad".
I asked several of my Muslim employees and they were unaware of any.
I also find it interesting that as Muhammad is one of the most popular names for Muslim men.
Since that is the most popular name, would it be safe to assume that most theives in the Muslim world are named Muhammad?
Can we even begin to list the number of criminals with the name Muhammad?
It is men that are capable of acts of violence, barbarism, cruelty, and immorallity. If there is anyone
bringing disrespect to Muhammad it is the countless men who bear that name and have committed
crimes against their fellowman.
Not Teddy Bears! All they do is look cute & fuzzy!