The "Overlord's" Take On The Revolution, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 7-11-2007 @ 05:55 PM by AccessDenied
reply to post by intrepid



You missed the BLECH!!!
Iam a NASCAR GIRL!
GO Jimmie!!!!


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 09:23 AM by Malynn
Great job, congratulations, and I hope your plan brings the issues and "men behind the curtain" to a wider audience. My only "beef" with the whole lead-up and promotion of the event was your use of the word Revolution. (even the word "beef" is probably too strong for how I feel about it.)

My husband and I recognized from watching the teaser videos that the whole thing was just going to be some giant ATS commercial. Which is great, more people SHOULD know about a site where a lot of people talk about things that you could get institutionalized for in the real world.

I'm sure a lot of people on the site, like the majority of people I try to advertise to in my job, saw the avatars of some of the mods, and watched a few seconds of a teaser here and there and thought to themselves: "SWEET! Someone is actually going to plan something concrete to strike back at the man!"

Westerners are so over-loaded with advertising and information you literally have to punch them in the face with your message otherwise they just don't get it. However, it's not your fault that some people didn't take the time to really investigate what you were doing.

Yet, as far as our "beef" goes with your use of the word revolution: in our opinion the people on this rock we call earth are really, really suffering right now and I don't know if there has ever been a time where a real revolution was more sorely needed. The way corporations are throwing the word around in their advertising seriously cheapens it.

Stephen Colbert implied during "The Word" in the episode after that student was tasered at a John Kerry speech that Americans have no stomach for confrontation and he's totally correct. If the things that were happening now were happening during the time of our founding fathers you can be sure there would be mobs in the street with pitch forks & torches rooting out the corruption.

Now, when something upsets us we run to the Internet and blog about it or post notes on a message board. Sharing ideas & talking about things is good...but it is NOT a revolution.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 09:29 AM by SimonGray
Originally posted by mikesingh
That was a good presentation. But it could have been better if there was some commentary or music in the background. Or is my sound card Kaput?


We were playing specially selected music before and after the presentation however the amount of chatter going on during the reception possibly drowned out the ability for the webcast to pick it up.

All music was paused during the presentation itself.

Originally posted by Malynn
Now, when something upsets us we run to the Internet and blog about it or post notes on a message board. Sharing ideas & talking about things is good...but it is NOT a revolution.


Malynn, I don't think you've understood the User-Generated Content Ecosystem model, which is a revolutionary means allowing users to define and shape their own media.

ATS is not a small website with a message board bolted on to the side allowing a few random users to post one-liners now and again on a news story they found disturbing, we are the LARGEST collaborative community of our kind with minds from every corner of the globe. We have a huge sphere of influence, and the November 5th event has enabled us to present our already proven concept model the mainstream media.

Imagine that person coming to ATS, posting an informed and researched opinion on such a news item and then having the sphere of influence to enable their own personal contribution to BECOME THE NEWS STORY through a television or radio ATS outlet.

Online content generation is the way of the future, people are beginning to realise this, and ATS is a frontrunner.

[edit on 8-11-2007 by SimonGray]


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 09:33 AM by razor1000
reply to post by Malynn



i'm with you dude they should have celled it an awaykenkeing or something to that effect there was no real revolution started other than maybe some people throwing up from drinking too much.

Simon dont use jet lag as an excuse, it was your party it was your responsability and you know that.



reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 09:42 AM by SimonGray
Originally posted by razor1000
reply to
post by Malynn



i'm with you dude they should have celled it an awaykenkeing or something to that effect there was no real revolution started other than maybe some people throwing up from drinking too much.

Simon dont use jet lag as an excuse, it was your party it was your responsability and you know that.


Excuse me? I'd kindly ask you to re-read myself and SkepticOverlord's comments in this thread.

It was our event, our responsibility, we know that, I know that. What is your point?


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 10:44 AM by SimonGray
reply to post by Skyfloating



It's true! It was a really great experience to meet up with Bill and Mark for the first time. This goes to show how powerful the web can be. We can run a great website from all over the world having never met.

It was also the first time I've met some of the other staff as well, including William One Sac who I've been friends with since at least 2000!


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 01:16 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by Hal9000



Our, and I mean all of us here, revolution is that we are going to change the face of media. As it stands now, someone reports on something, be it a news item, or a book or a tv show or radio etc. People listen/read/watch and move on. What we think the folks at the event saw, and understood, was that a story evolves and takes shape after it is reported on. With a continuing, open dialogue, more facts are uncovered, more stories emerge and the crowd can control the flow of reporting to provide, hopefully, more accurate media for the end user.

Do we think the folks at the event understood it? We've already had some follow up interest from some heavy hitters so, yeah, I think they got it.

In our first meeting with Belzer he was talking about how cool it would be if he did a show, say on the Kennedy murder and then, a few days later, someone contacts him and says "hey, I've had this footage locked away for years and nobody's seen it and I think it might be nice to let the world see the shots from another angle."

Of course Kennedy is a wild example as the truth is, anyone who had footage that was still unseen would be out there making a fortune on selling the rights but his "idea" is exactly what we do here and it is exactly what we plan to do with all off line ventures.

Belzer understood, from day one, what we are hoping to put out there with our members. He's got like minded friends that also seem to "get it" as Springer is so fond of saying. It's surprising how many like minded folks there are out there. It's just a matter of showing them the path and our revolution, as it were, is the opening up of the door to that path.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 01:43 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by twitchy




This aspect was discussed back when the funding came thru. The investors want nothing to do with controlling The Above Network. That was something that was made clear from day one and was something that both sides understood. The amigos had been discussing deals prior to the funding and all of them were basically buy outs that would have ended the amigo control of the site and the business.

The deal we put in place was one that left the amigos with full control of the business. The investors are interested in the topics and the site and, more important, they are interested in protecting their investment. What better way to do that than to let the amigos continue doing what they have been doing? And doing it well I might add.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 01:59 PM by Springer
reply to post by Hal9000



No RB was not the guy we were supposed to get for the old show.

Springer...


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 02:55 PM by Malynn
reply to post by SimonGray





Malynn, I don't think you've understood the User-Generated Content Ecosystem model, which is a revolutionary means allowing users to define and shape their own media.


True that. I'm not exactly sure how that's going to work, although I get the general idea, I think. I certainly hope everything goes according to your design, and as someone else pointed out in an above post that it helps facilitate change.

Hopefully the ATS uninitiated who first come to us via the new medias don't just consider us cool, off-beat, alternative entertainment to fill time on the way to American Idol.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^