The "Overlord's" Take On The Revolution, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 03:20 PM by Hal9000
reply to post by Crakeur


Thanks for explaining it better to those of us who are marketing challenged.

I'm just glad that the contributions we make are being kept as the main purpose of the site. On other sites, forums are usually a side luxury, but here it is the main event.

reply to post by Springer


Thanks to all, and keep up the good work.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:10 PM by semperfortis
reply to post by pom311



AHHHHH

Here is your profile for LSDJ311

Looks perfectly fine to me..

LSDJ311

Semper


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:13 PM by intrepid
reply to post by semperfortis



There's always a few semper that just have to bash the site. Some I wonder if they're motivated from other boards.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:29 PM by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by SimonGray




We were presenting our UGC ecosystem model to the media. This was a revelation to the mainstream public who have not heard of ATS before. The model IS revolutionary, maybe not to ATS visitors who accept this as normal nowadays, but to the media, they were really excited about it!


I think we all understand this. But I believe the question to ask is? why didn't you just tell us that? Why all the internal hype? Most ATS members have heard of ATS before. I understand wanting to get the message out, but the anti-climax was a let down for some. Let me just say that I'm glad the media were excited.

As you say yourself, this UGC ecosystem, for existing members, is not revolutionary.

CT


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:32 PM by Skyfloating
reply to post by Conspiracy Theorist



Most members didnt participate in the hype. I could name at least 10 000 members by screenname who didnt post to the 5th of November thread. But please dont ask me to list their names just now.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:33 PM by intrepid
reply to post by Conspiracy Theorist



I don't mean to be rude in the least CT but what were you expecting? I mean that, I'd like to know.



reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:35 PM by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by Skyfloating



[sarcasm]
I wont ask for the list immediately. Whenever is convenient is fine.
[/sarcasm]

CT




[edit on 8/11/2007 by Conspiracy Theorist]


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 05:44 PM by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by intrepid



Ill answer this in the hope that I dont get flamed with a "if you dont like it dont contribute" response.

I was expecting something more than a marketing pitch. I was expecting something tangible. In short, I was expecting a revolution.

Now, I know this site is run and operated as a business, and I understand that businesses need to make a profit. More members = more advertising sales = more profits. Hyping a marketing pitch to existing members as a "revolution" is something that I never expected to see from ATS. Usually when something is hyped, it is worth it. My opinion is that this time is wasn't.

Please let me also state the following:

I love ATS. It is the only forum I contribute to on a regular basis, and I hope it will continue to remain so. I am extremely grateful that the 3 amigos have given us something like this, something that I agree doesnt exist anywhere else, and wish nothing but success and prosperity for them.

CT


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 06:15 PM by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by intrepid




OK, but what?


I think this question is missing the point, but I'll attempt it anyway.

Maybe some kind of mass gathering world wide. Initiating change on a global scale.

It vague, I know. I personally cant come up with a specific revolution, but then again, I havent hyped one up intensely.

CT


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 06:57 PM by NGC2736
Well, at the risk of appearing old fashioned, I will state that this is a revolution as surely as TV was one itself.

You see, I grew up in an era when Cronkite was becoming a household name. He went on to be trusted the way a dear family friend would be. By extension, those that followed in his footsteps were given the same "faith".

But as I saw the world change, the news did not. The voice of at least American news became the talking heads, and the real voice of America went unheard. Oh, there were polls, to ask what we thought, but polls have long been a source of amusement to people that realize that you can get the answers you want by asking the right questions.

The question is often asked, "Why are Americans so uninvolved in trying to change this nation?" The answer is simple; because we cannot be heard. News, of every flavor is run through a filter system. This filtering is based on money, friendships, agendas, and the other structures of power. Nothing gets on the nightly news without being run through a sanitation process to insure that the "right" presentation is made. It comes out as baby food for the mind.

The revolution is in letting the voices of the people decide what is important. And this revolution can become huge by showing the world outside of ATS not only how it's done, but how it's profitable to do it that way. Money talks, and bull walks, at least for any media.

So yes, this is a revolution. Not just where ATS voices are heard, but the voices of all the copycats that will follow. It was this way with mainstream media in the early days, and goes on today. (Look at the way "reality TV" has gone from the old show 'Cops" to a wave of them focusing on everything under the sun. Copies of copies.)

Some of these copycats will fail, some will rise to great heights. But the real winner will be the greater influence we the people have on how the world reacts to what interests an ever increasing number of keyboard revolutionaries. OUR voice, unfiltered by the suits, will gain wider and wider currency in a snowball effect that will sweep aside the old way where some small number of people get to decide what is news and what is not. What is important and what is not.

We win the revolution when what is reported on MSM is what they see people like us being interested in. When we start leading where the news will go, and no longer being forced to follow like sheep where some few tell us to go.

The revolution began, the shot heard 'round the world, 10 years ago. But just like American Independence itself, it took this long to be recognized by the established powers. And in their recognition is surrender to the inevitable. They are waking up to the possibility of being left in the dust.

Yes, I got what the party was all about. I toasted ATS and the future.

Sorry, I didn't want a one liner penalty.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 07:47 PM by Becker44
I, personally give the Amigos and their staff a great deal of credit for "Getting It!"

Where the rest of this post travels may not be palitable for many, I wholeheartedly believe it to be the truth.

This played well to the masses. By this I mean the core of ATSers which would share similar demographics to any other group of equal size. We must not be fooled as fellow members that we are better or different than any other group of similar size. We have males, females, young, old, wealthy, lawyers, cooks, and so on. We are like all other groups of people.

My belief is the Amigos are sharp enough to know what makes the majority of this group tick.

Clear evidence abounds on ATS of the vulnerability and general receptivness of the majority. Most people want to be led. Now, take it easy and read on. This statement may not pertain to you the reader but remove yourself from the equation and I think you'll see the point.

Take a look at some of the posts made during the event. So many were enthralled with "B" actors and their dogs! No offense to Belzer, Ice T, and Gottfried but you must agree these are not the endorsers who will lead you to the promise land. They lack punch of any kind.

If the "revolution" is to take hold it must be done with a true leader. Someone the entire community will embrace. I hear the question coming so I'll throw a couple of names at you. How about Bill Richardson or perhaps Tony Blair, or even Rupert Murdoch. You get one of these folks to endorse the "revolution" and we'll all see some real action.

I'm afraid this is all for naught however, You see this minor "revolution" will succeed because the majority will follow it. They will heap praise and massage the egos of this site in their infantile attempts to be known as a supporter and yes sadly a follower. Thus the "revolution" will stall with the members.

If Simon, Springer and SO are true to the core they will individually or collectively initiate a true "revolution". I have faith in all mankind that their intentions are inherently good.

I feel I am in a position to put forth some final advice. I prefice this by coming forward with some personal information for the sake of clarity. I am a senior consultant to one of the worlds largest websites. It is the site one would use if they were searching for an automobile. We receive 14 million unique hits per month.

Gentlemen, if the event we witnessed is the precursor to your/our "revolution" I feel you/we are destined to fail. Firing up the troops for battle only to send them naked to the battlefield has only one ending. If you want to lead a "revolution" you must choose your leader wisely. Your respective appearances and speeches indicate a wide variety of talents and ingenuity, however you are in need of a front man or spokesperson. This will allow your/our "revolution" to begin.

The concept is solid but now you need an identity. It's branding in a sense. A quick and recognizable assimilation of the "revolution". You need the Nike Swoosh or the Golden Arch if you really want this to work.

The leader(s) of this revolution will not be we the members. The obstacles of that thought process may work to further the "revolution" by a small step or two, but in no way can it achieve your vision without a "brand" or recognizable face.

You will need a positive image associated with your goal. It must be true to the core, believable and most impotantly genuine. This will be a true "revolution"

I wish you all the best,

Becker

[edit on 8-11-2007 by Becker44]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^