Originally posted by mikesingh
So the question is, was the anomaly removed from ver. 2.0 of the CB? If not, then what or why did that anomaly show up in the first place? What exactly was it? Tape, paper clip, spilled coffee or just a glitch? Now that is the proof I require!

I can not know for sure how things happened, but this is what I think.

Those images on the browser, regardless of version, do not exist. When we choose any resolution, only when we choose the resolution that corresponds to that of the photos available for that area can we see the real photos. If we choose a different resolution then the software must look for the photos available for that area, join them, and send them as one image for our web browsers.

And is in this step that I think that the problem is. The first version of the image browser did not worked as it should when joining the images, especially when it was for an area for which on or more images are missing, that is why it created those strange grey areas.

The images used on both versions, as I said before, are the same and available on that site to which I pointed more than once and from which I get the images when I need.

So, in my opinion, and in this case I can say in my professional opinion as a programmer, the strange images from the previous version of the image browser are the result of bad programming.

Originally posted by Chorlton

Have you considered the idea that it might have been someone with a sense of humour that put it there? 'lets put something on one of the pics and see what the conspiracy people come up with'

I'd have done it, given my sense of humour.

Heck man! Don't those guys at Military Int have anything better to do? You think they would be screwing your tax dollars on whimsical pranks? Naaah! Though that's fine with me as I'm not concerned with paying American taxes!! I'm on Moon Base Delta!!

Cheers!



[edit on 23-9-2007 by mikesingh]

its also possible that whatever is being 'airbrushed' is of a concern for national security...could be something man-made that wound up there (satelitte, nasa craft of some kind) and not alien in nature.

[edit on 23-9-2007 by blueyedevil666]

Originally posted by ArMaP
This photo is available on the site that I have posted before, but that apparently nobody wants to see.

LOL now you see what I am up against "nobody WANTS to see"

Thanks for that link ArMaP I did not have that database

Originally posted by ArMaP
So, in my opinion, and in this case I can say in my professional opinion as a programmer, the strange images from the previous version of the image browser are the result of bad programming.

Well that is ONE explanation to be sure.. a little complicated, but it might be...

or it could be that they needed the 10 years before they released the final version to fix any previous mistakes...

So any work on our Japanese Spaceship?

Originally posted by blueyedevil666
its also possible that whatever is being 'airbrushed' is of a concern for national security...could be something man-made that wound up there (satelitte, nasa craft of some kind) and not alien in nature.

I am with you on that 'man made' part and as to the 'National Security' issue, I can tell you first hand how correct you are... That 'knowledge" came as a result of looking into ways to hide spaceships and someone laughed and said 'cloaking devices' ... which leads right up to stealth technology. And questions in that department definitely draw attention

Funny thing that people forget when they scream for 'proof' IF they have something like that, a base, a secret station, whatever... well THEY don't want you to find it If you do get to close... you get visits from those nice gentlemen that talk in a monotone and prefer dark colors in their attire...


And as we were 'reminded' recently...

"Just be careful.. They probably don't consider you guys to be a threat, or they'd have already 'bored you to death with conversation'"...

Anyone looking at that picture cannot deny the fact of a huge machine structure there. Look at the ridges, spaced apart exactly, look at the left side as flat and on the right where the airbrushing is, the thing drops off way down far.; imagine a skyscraper made of machione steel rising up from out of sight on the right and at the top it shows the roof of the thing.

This is no ' digital glitch ', the odds are astronomical that this is a gigantic machine of some type or leading to a part of the moons internal structure where the real mechanics of maintaining a plantoid sized craft are dealt with while we eat our Wheaties. It is unmistakably a huge structure and I cannot fathom how anyone can mistake this for anything else.

you will find the mars video on [forlonhope80]there you will see some matian critters that look to me like Groundhogs or goafers

Originally posted by zorgon

Mike and Internos You have just GOT to see this... I found the fossil rock!!! Its called "Humphrey"

Ok, this is kinda off topic, for the Mars Critters thread actually!!

Wow! That sure looks like a four-legged critter, fossilized perhaps! Now why has NASA brushed it out in the enlargement? It's clearly tampered with! And if there was nothing there in the first place, why was it circled/highlighted? You don't go around circling stuff for the heck of it! So there was something there which has been wiped clean.

And why is nobody talking about this impression-in-the-mud pic. I find it equally fascinating if not more than Humphrey!



So what made that very geometrically lined impression? A fossil with a backbone??

Cheers!

Keep posting those excellent links and photos zorgon!! I for one love them and invite any and all data on this subject!! Keep up the great work!!

Awsome thread and great photos with some rather interesting theories (on both sides of the fence ) .. Keep up the great work and keep those pictures comming ..ehh I wish I could find some good pictures to contribute but oh well I'll stick to reading and analyzing for now

It looks like it's in motion. Possible craft, rover or even satellite seem from above.

The problem I have with trying to understand this is...Are the people who work at NASA that dumb & novice? I highly doubt that. How hard/time consuming is it to use the clone tool from any photoediting software & then use the burn tool to add more difinitive characteristics to the edited image. It can be done in such a short space of time. It would take about the same time it takes to use the smudge tool and smudge and blur images. It seems very stupid and noivce to me.

Either it's glitches, NASA wants us to thnk it's up to this, while it's really up to that(misleading) or some chump at NASA finds this funny.

Originally posted by internos
BTW:
Mike:It seems that you've found a sheep on the Moon (a space sheep?)
Don't worry about it, that's normal: i've found a dog on Mars.

Sheep? Wow, then that critter could be almost a mile high from hoof to horn!! Lol! And errmmm....where's that 'dog' you mentioned? Can't make out hair nor hide of him!

BTW, those pics you posted in the post above are intriguing to say the least! Man, you really rock! Let's see what comes up by way of explanations!

I've enlarged the portion of the pic of that elongated object you posted and added some filter enhancements. This is what comes up...



Now what the heck is that?

Cheers!



[edit on 25-9-2007 by mikesingh]