 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:08 PM by internos
|
Originally posted by Havalon
reply to post by internos
Fasinating! I have tried to doa bit of enhancing myself! (and a rotation)
do you have the co-ordinates please?
Remember that "thing over my sisters house" thread? can't find it at the moment but will look!

Who could forgive THAT thread ?
The object is located in Mare Nubium between the craters Birt and Lippershey.
The coordinates for Mare Nubium are: 21.3S 16.6E
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:12 PM by internos
|
Originally posted by Alien Abduct
I have some photos to show but I'm having trouble with 'Photobucket' .I was wondering if you guys could help me. What is that other photo upload
website? 
Try here
imageshack.us...
[edit on 26/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:18 PM by sherpa
|
Internos, I have posted a pic from a Russian satelite called Zond they had several of these I think this image was from Zond 7.
They tend to look different from the NASA images you might fiind it curious.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:34 PM by internos
|
Originally posted by sherpa
Internos, I have posted a pic from a Russian satelite called Zond they had several of these I think this image was from Zond 7.
They tend to look different from the NASA images you might fiind it curious.
www.abovetopsecret.com... 
Originally posted by sherpa
I thought I would post these pics of Aristarchus crater as I had not seen them before.
You never seem to see this side of Aristarchus (crater ?) when it is usually displayed.
What interests me is the apparent structure that is exposed and would seem to prove it's convex nature which is unlike a crater.
www.lpi.usra.edu...

Sherpa
honestly, i have no idea about what could determine a crater so shaped: maybe some kind of centrifugal force, in the impact?
About the satellite, the links you provided will be helpful in order to find more source of pics from the same area. It's a really good find, this!
 .
www.viewzone.com...
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:43 PM by sherpa
|
reply to post by internos
Actually your looking at the wrong one, look further down the page.
The ones you are looking at are NASA.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:50 PM by internos
|
Sherpa, do you mean the one ArMaP quoted?
This one?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:52 PM by sherpa
|
Originally posted by internos
Sherpa, do you mean the one ArMaP quoted? 
No, much further down the page you can't miss it, it is an image of the whole farside globe.
Posted as Zond.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:58 PM by internos
|
Ah, now i understand: i thought you was talking about craters in order to explane the crater i posted before (i noticed the apollo string in the
link): are there visible in that pic too? The original source? Do you know if there are in higher res?
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:03 PM by sherpa
|
Originally posted by internos
Ah, now i understand: i thought you was talking about craters in order to explane the crater i posted before (i noticed the apollo string in the
link): are there visible in that pic too? The original source? Do you know if there are in higher res?
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos] 
Sorry I should have made myself clear, no crater connection.
The Zond pic is not available anywhere I know of in Hi-Res I would love a copy if it was.
Have you looked at the image yet ?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:09 PM by internos
|
reply to post by sherpa
Of course, some comparison are needed. I can tell you a first impression: IMHO, it looks that some reliefs are much more visible: in the Clementine
ones, for instance, some appears to be flatter: sometimes you cannot realize if a shape is a hole or a relief. But something else look to be
missing...
But just firs impression. It's needed to compare the same area, of course..
[edit on 25/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:16 PM by sherpa
|
reply to post by internos
I agree it does seem to show more texture.
I will leave you with it and if you spot any anomalies I am sure you will post them.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:18 PM by Havalon
|
reply to post by internos
You could try this site Internos:
www.mentallandscape.com...
I hope I got the link right!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:20 PM by internos
|
Originally posted by sherpa
reply to post by internos
I agree it does seem to show more texture.
I will leave you with it and if you spot any anomalies I am sure you will post them. 
Of course i'll do it.
Already downloaded, thank you.
What do you think about the triangle of the previous page?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:26 PM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by ZeroGhost
Library of Congress is another place to troll for imagery associated with the space program and just about anything else. 
Really? They have images online?
Lemme at em!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:30 PM by internos
|
reply to post by Havalon
Yes, that is!  !
Ther's the one sherpa posted in the other thread too. Thank you!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:35 PM by zorgon
|
Problem with that one is its the context image for the strip (the area in green) so will not likely show much.. here is the strip
M2100370
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:36 PM by sherpa
|
reply to post by internos
The Triangle was excellent work I had never seen that exposed before.
If it is mobile in any way than I can't see how it can be verified in any other images though, so I don't know the way forward with that.
I have some other images I would not mind you having a look at though probably later because it is late now and I think I had better get some sleep, I
will u2u when I get a chance.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:44 PM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by sherpa
The Zond pic is not available anywhere I know of in Hi-Res I would love a copy if it was.
Have you looked at the image yet ? 
Highest resolution available is this one..
Zond 8
All the available Russian images are on that site
www.mentallandscape.com...
He has been collecting them from Russian raw data and they are jealously copy righted.. I have been waiting for some time to get permission to use
them on my site but he specifically does not tolerate "alternate ideas"
I have since discovered thought that they came from someone else so I am tracking down Phil
Thanks to Phil Stooke for Luna-12, 13, 20, 22 and Zond-6, 8 photos, scanned at IKI and MIIGAiK in Moscow. Thanks to Alexander Basilevsky and Arnold
Selivanov for information about Luna-16, 20 and 24 missions and imagery. Thanks to Don Davis for some high quality Zond-7 scans. Thanks also to Sergei
Hlynin for Luna-12 and 19 images.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:57 PM by Havalon
|
reply to post by zorgon
Phil Stooke's web site:
publish.uwo.ca...
Quite interesting site even has a e-mail adress for you!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-9-2007 @ 12:53 AM by internos
|
If i'm correct, it seems that the triangle is a natural formation
(comparison Clementine / Orbiter)
[edit on 26/9/2007 by internos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |