Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure?, page 6

Originally posted by mikesingh
reply to post by internos

---

How the devil do you get hold of such stuff? Amazing! Now that's something our experts need to explain. And have a look at this tower on the Moon...



Have a nice day!

Another amazing find Mike!
Do you know approx the location on the moon and the year it has been taken?

By the way, i assume someone else has already noticed this:

Original Caption Released with Image:
About 50,000 Clementine images were processed to produce the four orthographic views of the Moon. Images PIA00302, PIA00303, PIA00304, and PIA00305 show albedo variations (normalized brightness or reflectivity) of the surface at a wavelength of 750 nm (just longward of visible red). The image projection is centered at 0 degree latitude and 180 degrees longitude. Mare Moscoviense (dark albedo feature upper left of image center) and South Pole-Aitken Basin (dark feature at bottom) represent maria regions largely absent on the lunar farside. The Clementine altimeter showed Aitken Basin to consist of a topographic rim about 2500 km in diameter, an inner shelf ranging from 400 to 600 km in width, and an irregular depressed floor about 12 km in depth.

Source:

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

EDIT to add:
About these pics
This is just a wild theory:
it looks that someone made a triangular layer (darker) in order
to cover the brighter one: and then something's gone wrong and
the two layers doesn't match.


Just a crazy idea here....


[edit on 20/9/2007 by internos]

Originally posted by slaveearth
reply to post by mikesingh

---

please check out my thread on Mars..www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Nice find, but I'm a trifle skeptical about what RCH writes. OK, some stuff of his is good, must most others is imagination gone a little wild. Like the face on mars being a nuclear reactor just because of its shiny appearance in a dawn pic! That was nothing but sunlight reflecting off the surface!

But yes, Mike Bara (Not related to me!! ) is more credible and thus I await his 'Secret History Of NASA'. Let's see what he's got!

Cheers!

reply to post by internos

---

Wow! Super find internos!!

OK. Here’s the original pic of the tower. Thanks to Keith for the find.


Apollo Orbital Image AS16/H/AS16-118-18957
Courtesy: Keith Laney

And do you notice an object in space above the horizon? Well, it could be dust on the lens, a photographic glitch, ice particles, or the ubiquitous swamp gas!!

Cheers!

reply to post by internos

---

So I am not crazy , like i posted before I did see a triangularshape there , well first I thought its a tetrahydron but after looking closely at what you show I think your assumption is more correct , whatever we see is a side of a triangular shaped object

I did not read all the comments, but are you familiar with the website of Joseph P. Skinner, Mikesingh?

I found the same picture on his website.



He has fantastic pictures on his site, which he regards as evidence of even forests on Mars.

Look at this page!
Skinner Site Forest on Mars
I spend two hours on his website. Amazing stuff, although it is impossible for me to give a final conclusion. It looks great, however.

[edit on 20-9-2007 by Pjotr]

reply to post by Pjotr

---

Yes, Pjotr. JP is an acquaintance of mine. And by the way, he's JP Skipper, not skinner!!
If you read a couple of pages back, I've said more about him! And yes, JP's got a great site going, though I haven't had the time to wade through it in detail so far!

Cheers!


[edit on 20-9-2007 by mikesingh]

Originally posted by CyborgPirateNinjaJesus

That makes sense, but one would assume NASA of all people, wouldn't tape things to their photos ( just considering the importance and quality of them) but thats just my view on it. plus people make mistakes all the time so it could just be tape ..

Now why would that make sense?

You guys really get me some time Silly Lemmings

First of all have any of you looked in to check how NASA processes these images? Do you really think they make prints and then scan them for us? And leave sticky notes and coffee stains on them? Come on NASA makes mistakes but seriously... And you guys say John has crazy ideas
Gee great research here guys

You have also missed the obvious...
These are NOT FROM NASA The only thing NASA did with Clementine is run Mission Control Its a US NAVY Department of Defense Star Wars project...

The source of the image should have given you that much info. NAVY.MIL Everyone picks on NASA... (but then that's why NASA is there)

www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

How about just reading the opening statement on the image source site?

Naval Research Laboratory
NRL was responsible for the design, manufacture, integration, and mission execution of the Clementine spacecraft for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. During its two-month orbit of the Moon in 1994, Clementine captured 1.8 million images of the Moon's surface. The Laboratory provides the Clementine Lunar Image Browser as a courtesy to scientific researchers, as well as the general public, and you are welcome to browse the over 170,000 images that are available.

Now why would the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization want pics of the moon? Surely they don't want to stick WEAPONS up there on the 'high ground'??

If you notice 1.8 million pictures taken
We are allowed to see 170.000 not even 10%

Your taxes paid for them... write congress and DEMAND to see them!

As to the "coverup" these were first generation images at the Version 1.5 browser and they did not care to be good in hiding stuff. The images are pixellated because they are low resolution JPEG files VERY low res... After all they didn't want you to see the full color HIGH RES images...

Too good for Lemmings

Now then... I love Mike's work and he is now featured on Pegasus... and so because he works so hard I will toss a few into the ring...

And if you have any questions about Clementine just ask... but drop me a U2U because I can't follow all the threads ...

Now the images I will post first are from the Version 2.0 Navy Browser Harder to use you need coordinates and the NAVY has a different Lat/Long system... but they are better quality...

Exhibit A

Reiner Gamma showing DATA LOSS Not cover up... I can say this because I have the original full color without the square...



Exhibit B

Ukert Crater
Richrd Hoagland's "Arcology Row" Area
This one shows 'smudging' You can see the triangular crater Ukert but the famous Hoagland anomaly area looks like a cloud front moved in and we all know there are no clouds on the moon



Exhibit C

This one I lost the coordinate for... if anyone has them please let me know
This one has been shown as a 30 kilometer building on the Moon... This one is not bad but without the coordinates I cannot find it on the color images




Exhibit D

These next two are coverups Not Data Loss... not tape... coverup.. and they don't care that you know they cover them up. All you have to do is visit Langley and read the files... they even created a 3-d moon



Exhibit E

Now in this one it was so badly covered you can still see pieces behind...



I will give you coordinates for this one...

Use the V1.5 browser www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

Set Resolution to 1 pixel = 1 kilometer
Set image size 768x768
Set Lat -70
Set Long 137

Hit "use lat/long" button

continued next post.....

Now then let me show you our favorite one from these images..

Exhibit F

This is one of the ones used in the disclosure video.. where they talk about airbrushing... There is something you people need to understand about 'disclosure' Many on the inside want to talk but can't They can however leak out certain things...

They also use misdirection. In this image a lot of fuss has been made about the "two tall towers' that have been airbrushed out... Well you can see what they mean and everyone focuses on the "towers" Just look around the web...

But lets talk a bit about scale... if these were 'towers" they would be several kilometers tall Remember I said set the resolution to 1 pixel = 1 kilometer

Think about it...

Here is the picture

Now when hunting anomalies on the Moon it is important to keep scale in mind... This image was 'leaked out' and made prominent in disclosure films because they left something on it... but they wouldn't come out and say it

Look just to the right of center, to the left of that "tower" This artifact was found by Johnny Annonymous, a member of AboveTopSecret.com and fellow researcher.

This object is reflecting sunlight very strongly, is hovering above the surface and casts a triangular shadow. Looking close you can see the "fins" behind the craft, and the matching shadow. Below is a closer view. We will attempt to locate this in later versions. This is an example of the scale we need to keep in mind when looking for anomalies

In the John Lear Lunar Orbiter V image we found this...

And then there is NASA's secret project(This one was canceled but there are many others of this design 'floating around'



Here is another one


OH almost forgot... to those new to our threads... in case you don't believe me about the Color images that Clementine REALLY took and only gave the Lemmings poor low quality pixellated JPEGS to oggle over...

Eat yer Heart out... then call yer Congress Person and DEMAND ANSWERS



Reiner Gamma as it REALLY Looks (This is one tenth size the other is too big for here )




[edit on 20-9-2007 by zorgon]

Zorgon, after publishing it, you'd better to hide somewhere:
MIB will be soon on you!

I owe you hundred beers, GERMAN ones.


________________________________________ -|-


Top: clementine @ 1 pixel = 2 kilometers
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...


Bottom: PIA00304 (Clementine images processed)
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...






Clearly same location, different appearence because
the shape-shifting from spheric to flat.

Now, i think i've found the location of the triangle on the moon:


Of course i could be wrong.

EDIT to add:

zorgon:
Exhibit C

This one I lost the coordinate for... if anyone has them please let me know
This one has been shown as a 30 kilometer building on the Moon... This one is not bad but without the coordinates I cannot find it on the color images

You can find it here (left side)
astrogeology.usgs.gov...

in this point

Appearance on clementine website:


Appearance on Google moon


Comparison:







[edit on 20/9/2007 by internos]

reply to post by internos

---

Well I have got to say I am impressed by your speed and presentation internos.
This is the first time I have seen those anomalies processed so quickly and displayed so well.
Your investigative skills on the internet are exceptional.

Thank you for your contribution.

reply to post by sherpa

---

Thank you for what you wrote, i really appreciate it
i try to do my best

Irradiatus,
the construction you've done is interesting, and logical;
however, i whish just to consider something:
the morphology of the area.

What we need to see is what you see in this map. Nothing more, nothing less;
no craters/rocks bigger/smaller than before, not vanished craters replaced with
empty spaces, no cutted/replaced areas.
I understand that data is missing, but where are the details between
Jules Verne & Mare Ingenii?
I'm NOT saying it's wrong, just noticing that with the triangle are
vanished away many other details .
Is there any way to rebuild all the area in a single image
in order to make a comparison, which is the ONLY way in order
to prove something? The only aree to replace is the triangle one.
Consider that the only Jules Verne diameter is approx 90 miles...

___________________________________________________________

zorgon:

Courtesy:
www.thelivingmoon.com


Of course, you'll find a better one.
BTW, what about the stripes comin'out from there? Something to do with
T H I S ?


[edit on 20/9/2007 by internos]

Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags

The Devil\'s Chord: The conspiracy to open the portal of consciousness and mystery of the octave
  Posted 3 days ago with 154 member flags

The Coca Cola Conspiracy: The secret cause for the U.S. obesity epidemic
  Posted 14 days ago with 139 member flags

Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags

Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags

The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Bank of America DOES NOT accept U.S. DOLLARS as payment on mortgages
  Posted 7 days ago with 85 member flags

Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: