AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the General Conspiracy Discussion discussion forum.  (rss)


Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure?


<<  10    11    12    13  >>



reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 04:45 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by internos
Since i don't want to feed the TROLLS, i'll ignore you.
You don't deserve any answer and i haven't time to waste with you.





Yer a better man than me Internos...
I admit to giving in to Troll Feeding from time to time

Have you seen this one yet? I posted it in the 'Hole on Mars' thread but I want you and Mike to look at this in the original strip... The one on the left is a volcano the one on the right is the weird one... (highlighted in second image) have a really good look at this one







Original MSSS Strip
M0303865.gif


Now all this talk of Triangles has me tempted to post my 'weird crater' collection...

But how about 'Eve's Apple'






   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 06:07 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by internos
Strangely, you're attacking me in the moment that i talk about TROLLS.
Are you maybe defending the category?



HA Caught ya feeding Trolls I mean just LOOK at that avatar...

The problem with people like Chorlton is that they would rather you just go wawy and not even look at any anomalies... (though at least he finally admits they DO exist)

He would have you deny all your natural human curiosity and conform to his drastically limited ability to seek understanding. What he and the small handful of his supporters fail to comprehend is that their tactics don't work and they are merely blowing smoke.

One only has to look at the stars that Mike's and John's threads get to see there is a lot of interest and support in this. I personally believe that this is what drives them... they are on a crusade to save the world from US

Serious skeptics that do counter research and present a logical case with evidence stimulate the conversation and at times even help you look harder... these skeptics I can disagree with and still respect...

But Chorlton and his ilk produce nothing of value (though sometimes they offer amusement) and are generally a waste of time trying to answer..

Denythestatusquo made an interesting observation in this thread...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Love the chart, somebody should make posters and sell them.

A debunker as shown is not intelligent, nor wise, nor seeking knowledge. They are a person that 'desires a win.' They are like the person at work that kisses up to the boss. They don't play fair and they have no intention of doing so.

Feigning allegiance to the 'system' they show everyday that the weak are cowards and never really grow up.


The chart he speaks of is this one... from that same thread...





But seriously... the "Trolls" number fewer than my fingers and when I weight that against the hundreds of U2U's, favorable posts, participation points and awards and private emails from some very interesting sources including real scientists offering evidence...

Well the Trolls are no more than...

A toy to use and toss in the gutter when done...




OH! Hey there Chorton... didn't see ya come in

You know.... I just LOVE this quote from the site you found your avatar at...

"An Internet troll is a person who sends duplicitous messages to get angry responses. The term derives from the phrase "trolling for suckers" and ultimately from trolling for fish. The term is frequently abused to slander opponents in heated debates and is frequently misapplied to those who are ignorant of etiquette." - Wikipedia




alesrarus.funkydung.com...


So now that you have admitted your are nothing more than a troll... we can get back to business




[edit on 6-10-2007 by zorgon]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 03:46 PM by antar


It is probably a base camp for the earth prisoner work program. Miners if you will. Some storm must have temporarily uncovered it. Just my guess...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 10-7-2008 @ 12:12 PM by Anonymous ATS


Mates that always doubt... YOU haven´t played with Photoshop, or ever applied in your lifetime something called Ockam´s Razor: the simplest explanation is the most logical one, after every know explanation could be used.

Let´s say you have to vapourize some info over a photo, or edit some very big imagery. So, let´s Photoshop the image: basic copy&paste, heal, burn, change levels, liquify. Yeah... on each and every image. 1000s of them. Let´s go, we got a schedule! Let´s say we denied something for over 30 years, it´s plenty of time to change it all!

Well... Photoshop wasn´t THAT good up until 10 years or so, but hey, whathever... Computer were slow and you can just put it on a super-computer of 30 years ago because, well, there wasn´t PS around...

Let´s say everything is easier now. But you have what "Sayid" said on Lost: basic aiming - pointing and shooting -. You HAVE to do them all by knowing where all are. Now let´s think about that, how many people editing pics would be needed... They ALL had to keep secrecy!

Do you know why every other Playboy and porn magazines covers are all over the internet with the real ass of that beautiful woman? Showing some cellullite or her true boobs before editing was done? Because IMAGE EDITORS get PISSED OFF after doing that much over and over again, and no one remembering that that woman right there has some flaws on their body, and because she called him twice on the early morning (let´s say 2:30 and 4 o´clock) asking how big her ass was, because "you know who I am, honey!".

The problem with protecting original imagery lies always on how many people have seen it before it was actually redone. And why would someone waste an entire department being watched 24/7 if they could just do the stuff internally, then say that someone like those here discovers it, so what? They are all "conspiracy thinkers". They are harmless.

And we are. That´s it. We don´t own the news, don´t go over television with the same recurrent and high-budget news/documentaries/advertising, don´t have the "ship launching probe to whatever" to show... Don´t have anything. Just our brains and some poor folks that, like us, don´t think everything they say on tv, newspapers and movies are true.

They count on us. So we better just exist to show them that yeah, they should be more careful. If it wasn´t for guys like us, they would make such a poor job that, then, it would be a massive amount of s*** thrown on the fan when that "same picture like all" on the newspaper cover would show *whoops* a pyramid and the common regular opinion thinks "What the hell is that?", and thousands of calls congestionated the us and every country´s phone lines asking for an explanation.

Just a thought.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 04:11 PM by seridium


Originally posted by mikesingh
Here’s an image of the Moon, specifically at coordinates:
Latitude = -35 (not 35)
Longitude = 208

This is the original image taken from the Clementine image browser Here…Just fill in the details and click on the highest res.

Zoomed to area and added contrast…



The second image is zoomed further, and solarized, so it is more identifiable.



What do you think it could be? And I would also like to mention here that it is apparent that some sort of tampering has been done to try and hide the object. But it’s a pretty shoddy job, what?

An artificial construct? A film processing glitch? A UFO? Or a natural geological feature? You be the judge! As for me, one way or the other, that thing is pretty intriguing!

Cheers!


]

A perfect example how we are lied and deceived, nothing will ever be evendent they don't want it that way or we would know, Religion and millions of worshipers of imaginary gods would be crushed the economy would collapse people wouldn't fear hell no more and the world would be no more, so whats the point of posting images like this if they are in fact tampered with I say move on theres more to see that they have covered up.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 05:50 PM by ArMaP


Originally posted by seridium
A perfect example how we are lied and deceived
Not really, just an example of easy it is to make bad software.

The original images do not show that problem, only the first version of the on-line image browser that creates the image on the fly with the images available.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 11:14 PM by zooplancton


the one thing i don't understand is why after all these years we're still seeing 'blurred' images?

the person retouching photos for nasa can't use the clone tool in photoshop?
that's the weird part to me. (maybe i'll apply to nasa)

a good retoucher can absolutely manipulate that organic surface.

on the OP, that photo looked like a monolith type object.
great post!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 02:07 AM by mikesingh


Originally posted by ArMaP
The original images do not show that problem, only the first version of the on-line image browser that creates the image on the fly with the images available.


Exactly! It's been brushed out!

Cheers!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 10:41 AM by moonwize


reply to post by seridium



It looks like a big earth moving machine, with the blade exposed.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 01:28 PM by warrenb


reply to post by The Phantom



Youtube took the video down, anyone have a backup?

The excuse youtube is giving is "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by a third party. "

Hmmm third party being who..NASA, NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS or what?

hah



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 03:33 PM by ArMaP


reply to post by warrenb



Probably some company that bought the rights of that video (or the ones who made it), something like that has happened to me, I received a complaint against a video that I posted (a NASA video from the famous "tether incident") because someone has the copyright (apparently) for those images, even if they are in the public domain.

Today, the best way of keeping things from the public is by copyrighting them.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 03:44 PM by fatdad


tryed the link and it says the image is unavailable



   copyright & usage 


<<  10    11    12    13  >>

























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.181 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.