It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure?

page: 13
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 6 2007 @ 04:45 PM

Originally posted by internos
Since i don't want to feed the TROLLS, i'll ignore you.
You don't deserve any answer and i haven't time to waste with you.

Yer a better man than me Internos...
I admit to giving in to Troll Feeding from time to time

Have you seen this one yet? I posted it in the 'Hole on Mars' thread but I want you and Mike to look at this in the original strip... The one on the left is a volcano the one on the right is the weird one... (highlighted in second image) have a really good look at this one

Original MSSS Strip

Now all this talk of Triangles has me tempted to post my 'weird crater' collection...

But how about 'Eve's Apple'

posted on Oct, 6 2007 @ 06:07 PM

Originally posted by internos
Strangely, you're attacking me in the moment that i talk about TROLLS.
Are you maybe defending the category?

HA Caught ya feeding Trolls
I mean just LOOK at that avatar...

The problem with people like Chorlton is that they would rather you just go wawy and not even look at any anomalies... (though at least he finally admits they DO exist)

He would have you deny all your natural human curiosity and conform to his drastically limited ability to seek understanding. What he and the small handful of his supporters fail to comprehend is that their tactics don't work and they are merely blowing smoke.

One only has to look at the stars that Mike's and John's threads get to see there is a lot of interest and support in this. I personally believe that this is what drives them... they are on a crusade to save the world from US

Serious skeptics that do counter research and present a logical case with evidence stimulate the conversation and at times even help you look harder... these skeptics I can disagree with and still respect...

But Chorlton and his ilk produce nothing of value (though sometimes they offer amusement) and are generally a waste of time trying to answer..

Denythestatusquo made an interesting observation in this thread...

Love the chart, somebody should make posters and sell them.

A debunker as shown is not intelligent, nor wise, nor seeking knowledge. They are a person that 'desires a win.' They are like the person at work that kisses up to the boss. They don't play fair and they have no intention of doing so.

Feigning allegiance to the 'system' they show everyday that the weak are cowards and never really grow up.

The chart he speaks of is this one... from that same thread...

But seriously... the "Trolls" number fewer than my fingers and when I weight that against the hundreds of U2U's, favorable posts, participation points and awards and private emails from some very interesting sources including real scientists offering evidence...

Well the Trolls are no more than...

A toy to use and toss in the gutter when done...

OH! Hey there Chorton... didn't see ya come in

You know.... I just LOVE this quote from the site you found your avatar at...

"An Internet troll is a person who sends duplicitous messages to get angry responses. The term derives from the phrase "trolling for suckers" and ultimately from trolling for fish. The term is frequently abused to slander opponents in heated debates and is frequently misapplied to those who are ignorant of etiquette." - Wikipedia

So now that you have admitted your are nothing more than a troll... we can get back to business

[edit on 6-10-2007 by zorgon]

posted on Jun, 25 2008 @ 03:36 PM
reply to post by wingzero93

Or at least say where to go to find out how it works.

posted on Jun, 25 2008 @ 03:46 PM
It is probably a base camp for the earth prisoner work program. Miners if you will. Some storm must have temporarily uncovered it. Just my guess...

posted on Jul, 10 2008 @ 12:12 PM
Mates that always doubt... YOU haven´t played with Photoshop, or ever applied in your lifetime something called Ockam´s Razor: the simplest explanation is the most logical one, after every know explanation could be used.

Let´s say you have to vapourize some info over a photo, or edit some very big imagery. So, let´s Photoshop the image: basic copy&paste, heal, burn, change levels, liquify. Yeah... on each and every image. 1000s of them. Let´s go, we got a schedule! Let´s say we denied something for over 30 years, it´s plenty of time to change it all!

Well... Photoshop wasn´t THAT good up until 10 years or so, but hey, whathever... Computer were slow and you can just put it on a super-computer of 30 years ago because, well, there wasn´t PS around...

Let´s say everything is easier now. But you have what "Sayid" said on Lost: basic aiming - pointing and shooting -. You HAVE to do them all by knowing where all are. Now let´s think about that, how many people editing pics would be needed... They ALL had to keep secrecy!

Do you know why every other Playboy and porn magazines covers are all over the internet with the real ass of that beautiful woman? Showing some cellullite or her true boobs before editing was done? Because IMAGE EDITORS get PISSED OFF after doing that much over and over again, and no one remembering that that woman right there has some flaws on their body, and because she called him twice on the early morning (let´s say 2:30 and 4 o´clock) asking how big her ass was, because "you know who I am, honey!".

The problem with protecting original imagery lies always on how many people have seen it before it was actually redone. And why would someone waste an entire department being watched 24/7 if they could just do the stuff internally, then say that someone like those here discovers it, so what? They are all "conspiracy thinkers". They are harmless.

And we are. That´s it. We don´t own the news, don´t go over television with the same recurrent and high-budget news/documentaries/advertising, don´t have the "ship launching probe to whatever" to show... Don´t have anything. Just our brains and some poor folks that, like us, don´t think everything they say on tv, newspapers and movies are true.

They count on us. So we better just exist to show them that yeah, they should be more careful. If it wasn´t for guys like us, they would make such a poor job that, then, it would be a massive amount of s*** thrown on the fan when that "same picture like all" on the newspaper cover would show *whoops* a pyramid and the common regular opinion thinks "What the hell is that?", and thousands of calls congestionated the us and every country´s phone lines asking for an explanation.

Just a thought.

posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 03:57 PM
reply to post by Sophismata

I clicked on all the video footage and every time it says it says that its no longer avaliable.Where is the video and why is it that every one is no longer avaliable.When ever I look at what might possibly be credible evidence or so they say it is it is deleted.Alot of my friends and my Self are wondering what is on the video and every time its erased. If this is just a hoax there would be no reason to delete it and if it isnt then all this evidence is proff then we can assume its real for the most part.We will find the truth.Another thing is if it is real why would a cover up be nessesary?Its not like the truth is going to kill us.I can understand weapons technology being top seceret,but possible life on other planets.Seriously even the religious beleive in life on other planets.The universe is too gig to say that we are the only intellegent beings alive.If life did start from a single amiba then why are there so many species on this planet?One amiba many species?Putting aside the magical story of god and look at it from a practical point of veiw then every religion says there is a creator and who told them that?I dont think that every culture from the achient time all the sudden coincedently decided to say that some one made us thats not human.Who told them?Why cover it up?Why does this video keep getting deleted and where to find it?Nobody believes deep down inside were alone and to cover it up is lieing and keeping any one from knowing or atleast making an effort to evolve and grow from this kinda stuff.We want to see the video and the more we see deleted the more we can belive its being suppressed.If its a hoax then the video wouldnt do justice.We been studing the difference between man made evidence and the real thing and can tell if its a fake or not.Email me at and let me know if any thing I say makes sence to you and wether or not you agree or have any leads on where this video is.

posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:11 PM

Originally posted by mikesingh
Here’s an image of the Moon, specifically at coordinates:
Latitude = -35 (not 35)
Longitude = 208

This is the original image taken from the Clementine image browser Here…Just fill in the details and click on the highest res.

Zoomed to area and added contrast…

The second image is zoomed further, and solarized, so it is more identifiable.

What do you think it could be? And I would also like to mention here that it is apparent that some sort of tampering has been done to try and hide the object. But it’s a pretty shoddy job, what?

An artificial construct? A film processing glitch? A UFO? Or a natural geological feature? You be the judge! As for me, one way or the other, that thing is pretty intriguing!



A perfect example how we are lied and deceived, nothing will ever be evendent they don't want it that way or we would know, Religion and millions of worshipers of imaginary gods would be crushed the economy would collapse people wouldn't fear hell no more and the world would be no more, so whats the point of posting images like this if they are in fact tampered with I say move on theres more to see that they have covered up.

posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 05:50 PM

Originally posted by seridium
A perfect example how we are lied and deceived
Not really, just an example of easy it is to make bad software.

The original images do not show that problem, only the first version of the on-line image browser that creates the image on the fly with the images available.

posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 11:14 PM
the one thing i don't understand is why after all these years we're still seeing 'blurred' images?

the person retouching photos for nasa can't use the clone tool in photoshop?
that's the weird part to me. (maybe i'll apply to nasa)

a good retoucher can absolutely manipulate that organic surface.

on the OP, that photo looked like a monolith type object.
great post!

posted on Oct, 8 2008 @ 02:07 AM

Originally posted by ArMaP
The original images do not show that problem, only the first version of the on-line image browser that creates the image on the fly with the images available.

Exactly! It's been brushed out!


posted on Nov, 14 2008 @ 10:41 AM
reply to post by seridium

It looks like a big earth moving machine, with the blade exposed.

posted on Nov, 18 2008 @ 04:35 PM
hey people first time of posting on here i was just wandering if anyone else finds the fact that all of a sudden alot of countrys are heading back to the moon strange.for decades nobody bothered with the moon (from what we know anyway) but now everyones wanting a piece of the action.i understand that new countrys to space exploration may want to check out the moon to kind of stamp their mark if u will,but it seems odd to me that theyd choose to do this as its been done numerous of times already,surely attempting a manned trip to mars,or extensive photographing of a different planet would be more impressive and impactfull if there looking to gain recognition in this field.i am begining to think there is something up there that the americans found and are now letting the other super powers know about and investigate,hence the orderly que to the moon.

posted on Nov, 25 2008 @ 01:28 PM
reply to post by The Phantom

Youtube took the video down, anyone have a backup?

The excuse youtube is giving is "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by a third party. "

Hmmm third party being who..NASA, NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS or what?


posted on Nov, 25 2008 @ 03:33 PM
reply to post by warrenb

Probably some company that bought the rights of that video (or the ones who made it), something like that has happened to me, I received a complaint against a video that I posted (a NASA video from the famous "tether incident") because someone has the copyright (apparently) for those images, even if they are in the public domain.

Today, the best way of keeping things from the public is by copyrighting them.

posted on Nov, 25 2008 @ 03:44 PM
tryed the link and it says the image is unavailable

posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 09:20 AM
link to post by mikesingh

The photo of clemetine show that anomalies have been airbrushed. There are hundreds of such images which has been manipulated by NASA to prevent the truth. I can show you more anomalies on moon.

See the links:

Amazing Artifacts

A "V" shaped

A Lunar Tower

posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 12:32 PM
reply to post by mikesingh

The white object (high albedo) located in the Copernicus Crater seems to have an evident artificial architecture. A horizontal half-circle shape (with a shadow on a part) terminating at the front with a curved plan (on the right) toward the left side. An overhanging 'head' is at the center of the structure. On the left of the object there's a T-like building, with a spherical object above.

How does NASA explain this ?

posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 12:40 PM
reply to post by LunarAnomalies

Yes moon is not what it look like to us. There are many evidence which points to the fact that something is there which NASA don't want to disclose.

How does NASA explain this ?

The shard and the tower on the dark side of the moon what are they?These images are from Lunar Orbiter frame LO-III-84-M. Taken with the medium
resolution camera at a distance of at least 250 miles, it shows an object dubbed by Hoagland the "Shard".
The star-like object above the "Shard" is a camera registration mark. The "Shard" has a shadow cast in the
correct direction for it to be a real object on the Moon and is aligned with the local vertical rather
than the grain of the film, decreasing the chance it is an emulsion abnormality. Close-ups reveal a
cellular-like internal structure. Above and behind the "Shard" is the "Tower", a massive 7 mile high
structure with a central "cube" suspended by a tripod like base. Enhancements of the "Tower" show a
similar cellular construction to the "Shard", but with a distinctly hexagonal pattern.

posted on Apr, 15 2012 @ 08:09 AM
Weird. I have a friend that took pictures of venus. Looks like it has six sides. not round.

posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:51 AM
I came across this moon picture which clearly shows a cylinder shaped object sitting on the moon. Notice the shadow at the front left. If any one can workout what the sun's position is or how big these crater's are then we might be able to get a handle on how big this object is. No impact marks or crater around it. So it must have landed there and no fallen there? Strange NASA forgot to mention this object to the general public

If any one can post this picture on this page be my guessed. I new to this site and haven't worked out how too do this yet.

new topics

top topics

<< 10  11  12   >>

log in