It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not a billion dollar device, the whole project cost was $80,554,160.
Originally posted by chickeneater
Billion dollar device made exclusively just to take pictures, yet have blurs around areas that would measure miles in scale?
Originally posted by omi_kron_gravitron
moon conspiracy theories are becoming moot arguements.
NASA is not the only Organization that is allowed on the moon.
NASA cant block out earth based telescopes from looking at the moon...
if you live in jersey, near Rutger University, you can use their telescope to star gaze. pretty much any major university with giant telescopes have "free" night for people to use the equipment they pay taxes for.
Originally posted by PokeyJoefor everyone to find...
Please deny ignorance.
Originally posted by stompk
We need to put together a group of people and win that $30 mil Google prize, and go check out the moon for ourselves.
I have an idea that I've been working on for an
anti-gravity propulsion system, that would work equally as
well in zero gravity, that I would like to share with someone
who has mechanical/electrical engineering background.
Originally posted by instrumentality
heres the link. please someone tell me that they see the cut out part of the picture. its like black and the stars are cut off so you can easily tell something was cut out of the picture. again its almost in the center to the left a bit.
Originally posted by Brainiac
First of all get an image with better clarity then try to smudge the image. You can easily re-make this. All you need is Microsoft Paint, a filled in Beveled square and a smudge tool from ANY photo editing software, and you 'd probably get a more believable image...
And before anyone replies, I'm an expert on this bit. I'm a computer game designer.
Originally posted by poltergeist
Oh one other thing I forgot to mention as well. These pics were taken from the Clementine satellite, which was mentioned in another thread. The pics were being taken from a US military site with .mil as its extension. I'm ex military and know for a fact that site is legit.
probably in the likelihood that the NSA or NASA or the CIA or some branch of our government might delete those pictures from its website and send debunkers onto certain forums to give scientific reasons why it would be fake.
Originally posted by mikesingh
Originally posted by Pjotr
He has fantastic pictures on his site, which he regards as evidence of even forests on Mars.
Originally posted by internos
Zorgon, after publishing it, you'd better to hide somewhere:
MIB will be soon on you!
Now, i think i've found the location of the triangle on the moon:
Originally posted by Irradiatus
These are higher res pictures perfectly available from Clementine
Only some of the 415 nanometer wavelength shots are unavailable. You have to look at the other two wavelength images (The moon is imaged with three different wavelength filters).
What I've done... Stuck them together in photoshop... Nuff said.
Originally posted by bigvig316
I wonder what Richard C. Hogland would say about these pics. I think there was something on the moon. too much evidence showing there is. NASA needs to tell the truth to us once and for all.