Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 20-9-2007 @ 10:13 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by PokeyJoefor everyone to find...

Please deny ignorance.


Found this one on a NASA site



www.hq.nasa.gov...



They are leaving us bread crumbs... and once you start following the trail of crumbs you would be very surprised to see where it leads

I caught one poster here put it in perspective...

"when you are ready" You sir don't know how right you are (or maybe you do)


reply posted on 20-9-2007 @ 11:04 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by poltergeist

Oh one other thing I forgot to mention as well. These pics were taken from the Clementine satellite, which was mentioned in another thread. The pics were being taken from a US military site with .mil as its extension. I'm ex military and know for a fact that site is legit.


Yippeeee there IS inteligent life on ATS afterall... Seems you are the only one who noticed it... Hey drop me a U2U... you seem to be 'our kind of guy'

probably in the likelihood that the NSA or NASA or the CIA or some branch of our government might delete those pictures from its website and send debunkers onto certain forums to give scientific reasons why it would be fake.


No fear there , mate... they won't be removing them... They are there for a purpose... and just for everyone's information...

The dataset for V1.5 that Mike linked to and the one for V2.0 ARE THE SAME It just depends on the resolution setting

And the Color dataset is the same as well... only they had 10 years to make sure nothing got through on those. So the color images are great for beauty, but not much else...

It is interesting though that if you look at the image I posted of Ukert with the blurring... it seems they 'lost' more data later....

But one thing to remember the images ALL came from ONE dataset taken in 1994...

And these days they use Algorithms to 'hide' stuff So that if you have the right Algorithm on your computer you can 'unmask' it Only hitch is even possesing a copy of those will get you tossed in jail

Ukert Crater .01km/pix

Arcology Row lost and gone forever....




Kudos to the guy for saving the pics. He's doing something similar to what I'm doing, which is archiving all of this data for future reference.


reply posted on 20-9-2007 @ 11:37 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by mikesingh



I like the row of little craters leading up to the stick...

Kieth has some nice images in his collection... trouble is you cannot get an original to compare... We had the same problem but found old books that were printed before they expected us all to have high speed computers and digital editing tools

The image here is AS16-118-18957 of that there is no question..

Here is the same image in the great resolution that LPI provides



I have looked for this one in all my Apollo directories and it is missing from all the galleries. If you look at the Apollo galleries you will find MANY images gone for viewing Ask yourself why...

And no they did not skip a number

The only place I found it is in the Targa image list these are the full high res raw images that are SUPPOSED to be able to be ordered direct from NASA. The ones we have purchased turned out to be simply enlarged versions of the low res.

I bet it depends on from who the
request comes. I hope someone else will try here is the list

AS16-118-18957 is 20,122,685 bytes

history.nasa.gov...

Now then a question...

Lunar Orbiter took 1600 high res pictures from 22 miles above the surface with clarity 'enough to recognize a card table'
Smart 1 took hundreds of images 'at a res able to see a basketball court' before it crashed...
LROC same thing....
Clementine... well they took REALLY high res in full volor

So WHERE ARE THEY?

NASA Apollo took pictures with a 70mm full color Hasselblad camera
IMAX theaters use 70mm film
NASA images were first made public in .tiff and .jpg image formats

So WHERE ARE THE .tiff's?

And what is happening with the Japanese ship? Any word yet?


[edit on 20-9-2007 by zorgon]


reply posted on 21-9-2007 @ 12:24 AM by zorgon
Originally posted by internos
Zorgon, after publishing it, you'd better to hide somewhere:
MIB will be soon on you!


No worries on that ...yet. We (John and I) have already had one 'visitor' from a three letter club... and as I mentioned in that cryptic note. I am talking to a "Rabbit' that is higher than the 'MIB's'

Just where do you think we get some of those 'documents' from?

BTW welcome to Pegasus

On that Navy Observatory image you posted ... did you find a caption? I suspect that is not our moon, but its hard to tell...


Now, i think i've found the location of the triangle on the moon:


Okay that helps... Your 'triangle' is to the left of Mare Marginis COOL I will see what I can find

And thanks I remember now I just forgot to label it (the rectangle)
That is Mare Fecunditis The 'objects' are Messier and Messier A

Now let me explain how this works...
First you see it then you don't..
BTW Google uses the Clementine Data set...
Back to Algorithms

A Long Time Ago...On a Planet not so far away...

The Russians went to Venus.. (Venera 9) and took pictures...
NASA released ONE Only ONE



But what the Russians took was this...



Bigger Picture

Quite a difference yes? Hey they were the "Bad Guys" wouldn't do to keep letting them one up us...

Then come Algorithms

Step One



Step Two



Ta Da!!! BTW did you know that both Mars Rovers are equipped with automatic image editing software ie Algorithms? Thats why they mis some anomalies They are not perfect...

Besides they are not there to take photos only... they have 'another' mission... The 'Rabbit' told me


Oh an in that Russian pic... anyone notice how clear the sky is?



[edit on 21-9-2007 by zorgon]


reply posted on 21-9-2007 @ 01:03 AM by internos
Thank you. Pegasus is really one of the most exciting place i've ever been.
For me is like to taste a precious wine, a rare one

I can't believe what i see in the russian pic!
An optical illusion?

______________________


So, now is official, (thank you zorgon)



=






Rectangle = Messier & Messier A


________________________________________________

Now, what about this other one:




i have some doubts about this one (taken from the one on your website: different angle of course):
some details doesn't match





We have still the triangle and i have to get some infos about that
pic you were talkin' about.

[edit on 21/9/2007 by internos]



reply posted on 21-9-2007 @ 02:19 AM by internos
After seeing these pics from the Moon we just can state that it's ALIVE.


_____________________________
About this:


Found the same area here:
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...


Simple resize


Now we have just to know if the click is the same or if it isn't
(i mean: did they generated these two pics with a single one? Or they didn't?
The difference between these two options is big, IMHO).

[edit on 21/9/2007 by internos]


reply posted on 21-9-2007 @ 04:34 AM by mikesingh
Here's another 'Moon tower' I've highlighted overlooking Copernicus.


Courtesy: NASA

Check it out here and click to enlarge...
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

Zoomed...



Now this tower could be big, real big! But wait. There's another pic of the same area in a NASA website showing NO tower! So it's either brushed out or the darn thing is mobile! And did you notice the shine on it?

Have a nice day!

And Ron! Yer pics were mind blowing! (As usual!)


[edit on 21-9-2007 by mikesingh]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 119 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 42 replies