CARET/Drones Debunked? – A “viral” fantasy, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times
Topic started on 26-7-2007 @ 12:27 PM by Outrageo
CARET/Drones Debunked? – A “viral” fantasy parti pris

My dearest fellow ATS brothers and sisters: You are the best and brightest of all truth-seekers. Your intellect and skills of observation are unparalleled in the web-universe of Planet Earth – and those special characteristics are now being taken flagrant advantage of – and have been for months.

We have been taken for a ride of unbelievable proportions.
realityuncovered.com... , and, I believe, hits the nail squarely on the head. It is part one of a two part article written by Colin Bennett of The New Fortean Times out of London, England. Mr. Bennett has exposed the viral idiosyncrasies of the CARET/Drone enigma.

He refers to the saga as a version of “meme” psychology. To what end has yet to be determined, but the distinction to such early version campaigns such as the SERPO story is not lost. Pay particular attention to the “6 Steps of the CHAD Programme” at the end of the document. Very enlightening – and perhaps a bit disheartening as well.

I implore anyone who has a passing (or intimate) interest in the allegory of the Isaac/CARET/Chad Drone topic(s) circumnavigating this Earth to take a few minutes now and read: realityuncovered.com... .

If you have any trouble downloading the .pdf, or simply wish to check Colin Bennett’s site, you can go here. The “Meme Wars” excerpt about the CARET/Chad Drones is a few scrolls down the page.



Webster:
meme

/meem/ n. [coined by analogy with `gene', by Richard Dawkins] An idea considered as a replicator, esp. with the connotation that memes parasitize people into propagating them much as viruses do. Used esp. in the phrase `meme complex' denoting a group of mutually supporting memes that form an organized belief system, such as a religion. This lexicon is an (epidemiological) vector of the `hacker subculture' meme complex; each entry might be considered a meme. However, `meme' is often misused to mean `meme complex'. Use of the term connotes acceptance of the idea that in humans (and presumably other tool- and language-using sophonts) cultural evolution by selection of adaptive ideas has superseded biological evolution by selection of hereditary traits. Hackers find this idea congenial for tolerably obvious reasons.


Well – after reading this – anyone else feel we’re being duped?

Note: This is not a CGI/not CGI thread. It is specifically to discuss the merits of the “Bennett Meme Theory” as described above. Further to mods: This didn’t seem to fit the “explanation” thread (Chad as Isaac), or the “smoking gun” thread (Halo3), etc. – but feel free to redirect as you may see fit.

[edit fix link]


[edit on 7/26/2007 by Outrageo]

Admin Edit to give Reality Uncovered the traffic they deserve, PLEASE DO NOT copy other people's website pages into pdfs and post them here on a file server. Post a link to the site who did the work please.



[edit on 8-10-2007 by Springer]


reply posted on 26-7-2007 @ 01:43 PM by schuyler
Wow. Just read it. Curiously, another member and I were just discussing this issue with a view to starting another thread. I can't wait for Part Two of the article.

One of the interesting issues to me is the emergence of the DRONE CULT as the various ideas are whittled away.

1. We started with the "Oh, Wow, look at this" posts to whet our appetites for a very cool looking 'machine' or something.

2. Second up were the CGI experts proclaiming an obvious hoax. This resulted in other proclaimed experts disagreeing, both sides flaunting their expertise in a 'mine is bigger than yours' frenzy that lasted a thousand posts, just one of a dozen threads on the drones. Although we still see flare ups of the CGI issue, it is largely behind us not because it is resolved, but because the experts proclaiming fake have left in disgust. Biedny and Ritzmann no longer find the fake drones of interest, leaving those who think they are real. Thus the experts proclaiming fake are the first drop-outs from the general (ATS general? Ha ha ha) populace.

3. Proclamations of viral marketing emerged with Transformers being the primary target, though perhaps not the best of fits, and after release of the movie, no fit at all. Well, then, Halo3! No? How about some other film. Less and less likely the viral proclamators, of which there were many who ‘knew for sure’ and insisted, were the second group to drop off the Drone bandwagon.

4. A concerted effort at translating the figures ensued, with people such as hiii_8, Outrageo, and a couple of others leading the way. Curiously, there were those who insisted they could read the script, called it obvious and elohim, or Klingon, or Space Brothers Linear B. But those, too, though they ‘knew for sure’ and insisted, fell by the wayside as the characters defied decipherment. Another failure, another hold, another lack of explanation.

5. And the Drones, they were a changing! From Chad's light-weight pilotless sport model we began to see heavier, more ominous ships that just might have some 'equipment' inside that mass of floating metal in the sky. Our prayers were heard. The light weight drones grew heavier with our every question and demand, thus we created our own reality, just like they say you can.

6. Meanwhile, back at Coast to Coast, Linda and her buddies, in what even Bennet calls "her usual thorough manner" managed to wrack up anonymous witnesses only she knows, plus a couple of admitted CGI character studies done just to see how hard it would be, for Linda to call "real!" Thus reality imitating hoax is now part of the mix as ratings soar. Curiously, NO WITNESSES STEP UP except only in Linda’s Outlook address book. Ding! Ding! Ding! That’s an alarm bell the faithful do not wish to hear.

7. Next up at the batting cage is dear old Isaac, who worked in a non-existent facility deciphering text and back-engineering alien Tupperware to the point that, 'engineering wise' the characters became programming for the craft, their very existence running the code, magical characters with soul and purpose. Amazingly ornate translation tables devoid of real meaning, but convincing to those who gave up trying to understand them with the first curve of the nonsensical spiral of translation. Utterly meaningless crapola woven into grammatically correct syntax so that the wise nod ‘yes, of course’ without understanding a single phrase.

8. And curiously, those new to the fold, drawn like Mothra to the Cult of Drone, show up to comment on how special this all is--an engineer who says the Magical Characters just might work, to Sagan-like wondering posts of billions and billions of drones, but quick to shut down those who wonder just why these guys showed up now and who are they, really? It seems to question the new Drone Reality is no longer allowed as the Cult closes ranks to share belief and wonder.

And who do we have left hanging onto the egg beater tines for dear life as they are swept away by the wonder of it all? The stalwart believers, those who believe the Drones are Real, whether salvation or scout ship preceding doom. How can you NOT believe? How can you be so stupid as to not SEE the LIGHT with your own eyes. We are about to be smote by the Lord and you are acting superior. What? Do you think you're a genius?!?

Well, considering the lack of critical thinking skills exhibited by those who are left worshipping the drones, I, along with several tens of thousands of other ATS members will agree with you. Compared to you, we are. What we are left with is the Cult of the Drone, waiting on the mountaintop, circling the wagons for Yet Another Coming, eating astronaut ice cream and proclaiming that it is Good.

But it all begs the question of Why? As Bennett says, this is not a college term-paper prank. It's not a bunch of guys in a bar at Corona drinking the same making up Roswell in the middle of the smoke to turn up sixty years later when they are all dead. I thought for awhile it could have been a classroom project, enlisting the twenty students on various aspects of the scam, but no longer. This has some skill attached. It has a budget. Money has been spent. DARPA has given out another grant to the Rand Corporation for a study. Could this be it? A Black covert shadow DARPA dispassionately studying the machinations of THX-1138 caught in a room with white walls, ceiling and floor, watching his arms go akimbo, not knowing why.

Magical letters creating machine-code movement? Not a snowball's chance in hell. If that makes me an elitist, so be it. But Black-Ops DARPA? That's my cup of tea: New World Order Masonic Lackey. Member: MIB Black Ops Division. Why don’t you fix your little issues and Light This Candle!

Black-Ops DARPA? Come! On!! Down!!!!


reply posted on 26-7-2007 @ 01:56 PM by SuicideVirus
The notion of the drone story and its various permutations being some kind of sociological test is interesting, although there's nothing specific about it to indicate that. I agree, there's no proof either way.

At this point, the most plausible supposition about this whole matter is that it is the work of a number of individuals skilled at a writing and generating computer graphics. The information and graphics got more complex as more was revealed. That's about as much as we know.

As for the "why," that remains a matter of speculation. The leading candidates for that are:

1) Hoax -- An "art" hoax, like crop circles.
2) Disinformation -- Fragments of the info are real, but a lot has been created by unknown (government) sources to obfuscate the reality.
3) Advertising -- For a new video game or movie, but which one? If it's advertising, it's not done well.
4) People interested in revealing the "truth" -- Although they don't seem to want to reveal the entire truth. Too bad.

Perhaps this can equate to the SERPO matter, but I think it's a bit of a stretch.

In any event, we should keep in mind that in the grand scheme of things, this whole drone matter is only of interest to maybe a few thousand people in the entire world. The UFO community is really not tremendously big. And the drone stuff is suitable to the size of the audience. I don't see anyone making full-scale flying versions and flying them over the White House. So the activity is still very limited.

And for the most part, I don't see way too many people jumping up and down, completely buying the story as absolutely true. Most people seem to still be reasonably skeptical about the claims of Isaac and the photographers. Which is a good thing. I don't think many people are being outright hornswaggled. We're just curious and interested. What's wrong with that?



reply posted on 26-7-2007 @ 02:38 PM by Outrageo

If this is all just fake what is the purpose behind it?

I would love to hear the speculations as to the possible reasons why someone or some group would fake this.


Well, as the article described very succinctly, one purpose would be to gauge the reaction of the intellectually stimulated who tend to avoid most television programming and are typically very selective of their reading and other exposure to media.

If you can't "reach" these kinds of curiosity/truth/validity seekers through any other means, but really value their opinions if you could just get some of it, then going through the trouble of inventing an elaborate story such as this yields a veritable gold mine of reaction and opinion.

With thousands of such 'opinions' on ATS already (not to mention the other, er, "lesser" forums), a perpetrator can presumably plant the seeds, and then spend weeks or months "harvesting" the insight of relatively hi-IQ participants without spending a dime.

What can one do with such information? It'll boggle your mind... Just one example: You've likely read some of the conjecture regarding the viral marketing hypotheses, i.e., the drones are from Transformers, Halo3 or what have you. Nope. How about viral marketing IN REVERSE? You simply harvest all of the responses to see what the "UFO Geeks" are into - what turns them on - and then weave a FUTURE movie or game around it.

The possibilities are endless - it costs little to nothing, and the VALUE is immeasurable. No expensive surveys and 'market studies', no trying to squeeze opinion from a reluctant and generally suspicious crowd (of media/marketers et al) , no waiting forever for results, no trying to sift the material to see what is true feeling and what is just fluff. I find most posters here quite willing to spill their guts in an instant - no holds barred!

Without much imagination, I can think of several nefarious media/product marketing types that would be able to "use" this wealth of "data" for all sorts of "purposes". The ROI on something like this would be exponential...

[edit on 7/26/2007 by Outrageo]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Life Spotted on Venus - Russian Scientist
  Posted 17 days ago with 100 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags
Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 3 days ago with 58 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 16 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 6 days ago with 30 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 13 days ago with 28 member flags