First off i personaly don't like the way this guy gets his information acrossed. It takes 10+ min before you even start getting into the so called meat of his message. Wasted time that could have been used better.

First point..

CIA, contral scandle, Al Quada , Drugs , US funding Terrorists etc.

It is interesting to point out that right now on youtube and other video sites you can find soldier posted video's of HUGE pot,Heroin fields in afganistan and Iraq.
The soldiers in the video's joke about them and yet nothing is done about these huge crops of drugs.

The official line is that to destroy the crops would hurt the economy's of iraq and Afghanistan etc... You would have to be stupid no... REALLY stupid to not suspect that something is wrong with the larger picture.

It is well known FACT that the CIA is and has been involved in drug running etc.. Air America during Viet nam is just one example.

I think i can safely say that 99% of the worlds terrorists have at one point in time been involved/created/funded etc by the CIA.

Im sorry but i could only watch about 25 min of this before i got fed up with the way this guy presents his information.. Call it lack of whatever but there is only so much time in a day and the way the information is presented wastes so much of it.

From what i saw of it i do not see anything that isn't already in the public domain.

WOW! My appologies for the ever-so, clicheic reaction. But, WOW!

"With respect, i think you should be careful in your assumptions, unless of course you can back your allegations up with evidence, but as of yet, i have seen absolutely no evidence to suggest " The Government" did it, i very much dispute that, and it is a dangerous accusation to make.
Correct me if i am wrong."

"I'm guessing you have no clue what 9/11 truth is about if you think most truthers believe that "the government" did it. We are simply putting the idea out there that criminal elements within the government may have had a hand in the events leading up to and on 9/11. If your going to play skeptic, then please at least do a little research on the subject. "dangerous accusation to make."


"You mine as well give up on this one.He was one of those luckly ones that was born into the perfect life ,where he was lucky enough to never be lied to or manipulated by anyone/government/religion and how does he know this ,well "he just does" . I love when we get accused of saying Bush did it ROTFLMAO!!! It was the power that is over all governments."

"With respect, i think you should be careful in your assumptions, unless of course you can back your allegations up with evidence, but as of yet, i have seen absolutely no evidence to suggest " The Government" did it, i very much dispute that, and it is a dangerous accusation to make.
Correct me if i am wrong."


Where "suppose" to be able to make them coments becuase of that um whats it called oh yea thats right CONSTITUTION!!! "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" Our foundingfathers told us to rebel againt the goventment.If we wouldnt have let the constitution catch on fire we would be ok right now.

You know, I tried to watch the movie but... that first five minutes is so grotesquely OTT - b/w fottage, moody lighting, voiceover. Ewww. Sorry, I just like my facts straight.

But I've seen enough positive comments from people here I know to make it a must-see. It better improve and pretty quickly after those first few minutes, that's all.

ATM my favourite 9/11 movies are the Webster Tarpley lecture on 9/11 - preventing WWIII (which is, I think, a must see) and then of course the magisterial Core Of Corruption.

If you watch the Webster Tarpley first, CoC makes much more sense all of a sudden.

Yeah it isn't the average documentary, that's for sure. If you can get past the first couple of minutes and bear with it, the information he spills is overwhelming. Alot of folks have said they couldn't watch it, but I enjoyed the different approach. It's more akin to an independent film than a documentary and I think alot of people go into it expecting it to be more conventional. Definately worth watching though, it ties alot of loose ends.

Over two years, and so far this thread remains a ghost town. I was hoping some of our latest more robust resident skeptics could perhaps take a shot at this, the open challenge remains.

Originally posted by twitchy
Over two years, and so far this thread remains a ghost town. I was hoping some of our latest more robust resident skeptics could perhaps take a shot at this, the open challenge remains.

I received an email from a very good Nam veteran brother of mine.
I came over to this board to maybe find a place to post it.
So, no I don't follow you around Twitch. Although it seems you and I are preparing posts at identical times on the same thread. And post within minuets of each other.
Any way I commend you on your vigilance here.
You have demonstrated that there is a wealth of good solid information out there. And that good things take time and sacrifice.

Had never seen this video before today. Thanks for this bump. Production proess aside, it is a good watch for anyone that is on the teeter-toter and genuinely looking for more information.

Debunk for what in hell? Doin a think tank? That i leave to the falcons....

Debunking the truth must always be fun...

LOL, AN ATHEIST PREACHING TO US WHAT REALITY IS? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Hint: Might wanna stop misdefining every word you use to mean, "Whatever I feel it means" or telling yourself, "I don't see it: therefore it doesn't exist." Talk about Satan pretending to he the truth lol! And your even using an image thought of by God, a DESIGNED BEAUTIFUL IMAGE WHICH DON'T GLORIFY HIM FOR, to promote your denial of design! TALK ABOUT BLIND, BACKWARDS AND ARROGANT!

[edit on 9-2-2010 by fat_frank]