posted on Dec, 20 2014 @ 07:01 PM
a reply to: twitchy
the fact that the official report gets the basics of physics wrong is enough valid proof for me, amongst the other 1000 or so pieces of evidence.
or that at least 9 of the so called hi jackers are alive and well.
or how the fire "is hot enough" to melt steel but passports from the alleged hijackers floated to the ground in brand new condition so as to easily
identify them as the terrorists.
or the fact that the media had decided within 15 mins of the attack that it was definitely osama and nobody else.
the fact that the bbc reported building 7 falling 15 minutes before it even fell.. then the reported tries to stand infront of the building which is
still in shot to cover up her mistake, she "resigned" after that.
or maybe that the temperature of the fire could not reach the temp to melt steel.
3 planes all succesfully hijacked on the same day in the most "Secure" airspace in the world, whats the chances eh? then all of them hit their
targets and to top it all off, all the buildings fall into neat little piles so as not to disturb the buildings without new insurance against
terrorism surrounding the towers..
even the way the buildings fell started ringing alrm bells and i was only a kid, if the building were to collapse from a plane impact it wouldnt fall
like that, at best the top floors above the crash would topple down onto the street, the structure below isnt going to be weakened, its holding up the
same weight it did b4 and heat rises so howcome those 3 towers fell into such neat piles? and 1 wasnt even hit by a plane "lobby fires" brought down
wtc 7 , yea right and im the pope.
i could go on and on and on but im just annoying myself posting mor because ive discussed it so many times in person with people only for most of it
to go over their heads.
but why would i trust a countries government that tells europe they helped win the war against germany when the federal reserve was filling the reich
banks to keep them going against us.