It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Say what you want. You cannot avoid the fact that the world leaders are mostly a bunch of cowards who are afraid to face the true evil in our world. Bush and Blair did what they had to do, fully aware that they were going to lose the popularity contest.
um, the true evil in this world?
what about palestine
terrorism in palestine is far from evil
it may be deplorable
but it isn't merely for evil
thinking about conflicts in terms of good vs evil is a cold war vestige that needs to leave
there aren't 2 sides
the USA is fighting against it's own cold war era mistakes
not EVIL
Who else could make a stance against terrorism? Canada? France? Mexico? South America? Germany?
Who?
didn't canada, france, and germany go into afghanistan with us?
Originally posted by magicmushroom
Thank you for the replies thus far, its obvious from some that there are a small minority who are hell bent on making it a name calling slanging match which is a shame.
Originally posted by Togetic
There are a lot of emotions running high in here. So many arguments come from the extremes. I am an American, but I don't want to alienate the international community. It is just not practical, and I cringe when people claim that they want to embrace isolationism.
Assume, arguendo, that the invasion was illegal. What should the United States do now? The consensus seems to be that if the US leaves now, the country will fall into chaos. That is supported by a number of studies. Should not the goal be staying so that the new government can stabilize? Is not there a moral obligation to fix the problem that we created? I agree that as soon as the country is stabilized, then the US has an obligation to leave.
Originally posted by Togetic
There are a lot of emotions running high in here. So many arguments come from the extremes. I am an American, but I don't want to alienate the international community. It is just not practical, and I cringe when people claim that they want to embrace isolationism.
Assume, arguendo, that the invasion was illegal. What should the United States do now? The consensus seems to be that if the US leaves now, the country will fall into chaos. That is supported by a number of studies. Should not the goal be staying so that the new government can stabilize? Is not there a moral obligation to fix the problem that we created? I agree that as soon as the country is stabilized, then the US has an obligation to leave.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Very well thought points.
I however despise globalization... not because of what it is doing to America..
But .. what it is doing to the world. Globalization is taking essentially our way of life and throwing it down other peoples throats for the sake of progress.. in the end the country that get our call centers become more and more like us, just poor. Take India for example.. the cultural impact is great there, as it is in China, customs thrown out the window because people have call center jobs and new weird hours. Some good things come of it, women can work now... but it just goes against their way of life.
Will my grandchildren be able to fly across Europe and other parts of the world and experience a who new cultural experience, or some off sect of Americanism with McDonald's on every street corner in downtown Paris. Isolationism would keep us out of other peoples problems and allow us to focus more on our selves.
If we leave Iraq now.. that's when the extremes will happen.. possible ethnic cleansing.
I don't think we can, nor should stop the fighting until they them selves are ready to.. but we need to be there to help kill off agents like Iranians fueling it for their own good. Most insurgents Americans fight are possibly foreigners. Most sectarian violence is neighbor on neighbor (sunis used to rat out their Shia neighbors to secret police is they had a grudge resulting in who know what hell) and the fighters typically only fire at Americans if we try and stop them, or drive into the cross fire.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Globalizm is natural with such advancements in communication..
I can talk to people and debate with them from all over the world here on ATS.. It is hard to tell whos a Brit, whos an Ausie and whos an American sometimes, if not most of the time.
However I am against anything like McDonalds, WalMart, the super giants that mass produce cheap plastic wears of no value, no human creativity.. but thats my personal opinion and has nothing to do with this thread.
The three state solution in my mind is the absolute only way peace will be won in Iraq... the problem is dividing resources, such as oil, territory, sea access, the captial city, national treasures, land marks, displaced ethnicities, and the worst of it all.... a Kurdistan could bring war from Turkey.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
god you make me sick.
Your murdering innocent women and childeren for money?
Why do we need ANY OTHER REASON TO THROW UP BECAUSE OF THAT?
[edit on 3-2-2007 by mrwupy]
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
YOU CREATED THIS MESS, you have no foot to stand on when blaming everyone else for your countries collosal F'UP
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Its like none of you can think for yourself anymore.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Jesus age mary.... America Invaded Iraq. Get that through your head.
You invaded on FALSE EVIDENCE...
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
This is an ILLEGIAL war.. your leaders deserve to be shot for this.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop I tend to think maybe georgie and co had something to gain by ALLOWING THOSE ATTACKS.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
and looky looky, Chenney has made $80,000,000 of this war.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Does this not register or something with you? can you not see the REALITY when it is staring you in the face?
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Well everyone else can, and every day that an America still spreads its BS about ' Iraq was the haven of terrorists, Saddam harboured Alqeada, Ivading Iraq was legal ' it does nothing but prove how ignorant and narrow minded your country has become.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I wish your 'type' would go to iraq and fight, if you believe so whole heartidly in this endeveour.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
bring your loyal soliders home, because even though they are 1000's of miles away, atleast they can see the truth behind your countries leaders.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Agit8dchop you are at the same level with Saddam in my book.
Saddam had control... sure......... guess that makes raping women in front of their husbands, ruthless tortures every day, secret prisions.
But its ok if they have control. How old are you man? I think your issues go well beyond this war, you apparently have some built up hostility for America on more then one level.
Where is the proof that our government went to war for personal financial gain? None..... No im sure there is some.. most likely would post some alex jones bs.
But.. just let it be known to the world that Agit8dchop supports torture! he also supports rape! oh and I hear you like filing mass graves with Kurds from nerve agents. *claps for Agit8dchop* rule with an Iron fist so long as the media doesn't report it right? Every leader in the world is like this right? Stay in school buddy, and prehaps maybe even visit a real dictatorship.. I know it is so hard down there in Australia.