It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disc Low? Sure! Disc lo sure ....... Disclosure? Ants perhaps? **Speculative**

page: 5
1
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Oh, okay, according to this "structure" outsane means in sane, but Not insane, and outdependence means in dependence, but Not independence? We can quite do any thing that We desire and We have, but it is Now time to change in to a time of No time and bring into reality awareness of Existence' Perfection.

For in-stance :

De-sire : De - meaning to mal or spoil, to Be rid of, to decay.
Sire - A fatherly figure. Often used to refer to the male parent

The word desire is stating to rid some thing of the male figure.

If the English language can say that In really means Out/Not, then it can Be said yellow really means green, be cause that is the way it is decided to Be "structured".

Do Not fear change, if it is chosen to re cognize the un-consistencies of the word, the chosen reality will heal its self.

Un means Not, In means ... in. The language is Not consistent with its self and is in dire (meant as IN dire, not "NOT dire") need for change, the word is changing its self through Us be cause We are the word.

Does in-side mean Not sided? What about in-to : Not to? How do We usually use the term incredible? Amazingly credible or so amazing that it is Not credible.

I did Not look up any words, Nor do I, I tend to look them right to left and left to right.


a prefix of Latin origin, corresponding to English un-,


If in corresponds to English un-, then let Us keep it English as un, and Not Latin as in. If We are going to speak English, let Us speak English consistent and comprehend Our language 100% prior to adding in other languages that will cause obvious unconsistencies.

The word tran-slate was created so We could Be re-minded to tran-s-late. If only the word trans-late (tran [s] slate) was con-sistent with its self de-scribed de-finite-ion.

Finition - French for finishing. No English meaning.
De - French and Spanish for of.

Now if We are French and Spanish and We refer to it as a De finition, the word definition would make more sense... of finishing... a finished product, but We are English, do We want to Be French? Are We sure what We are?

Finally,

English Definition - To Be rid of finishing. If We are rid of finishing then We can Not finish any thing.

We all work together for a better future. Today is gloomy so let Us have tomorrow as a bright and Golden half revolution of the Earth, yet full revolution of Human kind

[edit on 31-1-2007 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]




posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tiloke
I'll be nice and NOT ask why you were seeing 3 different psychologists. Because everyone thats "ok" sees 3 mental health professionals, right?


I be nicer than you and offer a truthful response as to why i would be seen by different psychologists:

It was a manditory job requirement, and it is also a neccesity for holding certain security clearances. Do you think people hold security clearances without psych evaluations?



Again you are filling your thread with worthless posts answering your own questions and ignoring or grossly distorting others. You indeed do ignore those that disagree with you, or you twist their questions and intent to back up your own warped logic.


This thread was not constructed with the intent of explaining why people believe that truth is encoded into our words. I have authored a different thread which shows justification for me having done so. And the supportive evidence i have supplied is the logic i follow, and the logic you do not dispute in your posts.



Better yet start ONE thread about this subject instead of instead of spouting this crap in every section of ATS. In fact they have a section specifically for this kind of stuff(Skunk Works).


Because, if we are right about everything being encoded, and have supplied the supportive evidence that is logical, and has not been disputed as of yet on ATS in previous threads, then perhaps the method is applicable to all words, and each and every forum on ATS.

But, obviously at least one mod agreed with you, because here the thread is, in Skunkworks, once again explaining the same logic which no one on ATS has sufficiently disputed in another thread that offers the justication behind the logic, which you claim is grossly distorted, yet you fail to dispute that which says to do exactly what i have done, and am doing.

Thanks,
john



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Hey esoterric,

To diagnose an other Human vessel as in-sane would mean the Human vessel performing the diagnostic must Be venturing in to out-sanity; Out of its own mind.

We are Omni-sane : In, out, up, down, left, right, middle, the mind is every where and No where because it is No where and every where; Omni-directional or Omni-fied entities Existing Omni-divi-dually (All-divided-duality) yet simultaneously Eternally and Omni-finitely connected and this knowledge Exists for Us, Be-cause We are effect, and to know that We are it, this will eventually ameliorate Our one sided phychogenetics and bring upon Us a golden age of ambidextrous phychogenesis; a new reality where all is seen and all can Be known as a result of Us knowing all at the presentation of a question through Being the basis of Existence that is perfection


I can relate to this brand of thinking, and i can agree with it.

thanks for sharing you view, and your time,
john



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 10:44 AM
link   
Always and all ways. We are together for ever as the consciousness and the energy that is Existence, that is Eternal.

Working together will Be fun ; ) Continue doing a great job keeping your cool and spreading messages as truthfull as possible.

Thank you,
Eternity Being



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 01:49 PM
link   


It was a manditory job requirement, and it is also a neccesity for holding certain security clearances. Do you think people hold security clearances without psych evaluations?



Yes,I do. While I was in the ARMY ,I held a Top-Secret clearance (I can't tell you why, don't ask.) I never had to have a psyk-eval for it. All that happened was Fingerprinting, background check, non-disclosure agreement, and an interview with a security specialist, not a doctor. The questions all related to general security, finances or family and nothing about my mental state was ever addressed.
IN fact, the FBI's own website doesn't say they are required.

For some reason , they felt it necessary for you to see 3 of them.....I wonder why?

The background investigation may be expanded if an applicant has resided abroad, or has a history of mental disorders, or drug or alcohol abuse. A personal interview will be conducted of the candidate.

Thats from the FBI website.



But, obviously at least one mod agreed with you, because here the thread is, in Skunkworks, once again explaining the same logic which no one on ATS has sufficiently disputed in another thread that offers the justication behind the logic, which you claim is grossly distorted, yet you fail to dispute that which says to do exactly what i have done, and am doing.


I don't have to "dispute" you, everyone else here has done it quite well, but in your twisted mind, you see them as proving you right.

You don't seem to understand that the human mouth can only make about 40 different sounds. do you think in the last 5000 years of human history those 40 sounds may have been used in other words?



[edit on 31-1-2007 by Tiloke]



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 01:51 PM
link   
LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal

Nice try but no cigar. I would love to teach you about the English language, but its not my job. You, are completely wrong, and you need to study the origins of certain words. Words come from different places, and not all of them have the same structure.




[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal

If the English language can say that In really means Out/Not, then it can Be said yellow really means green, be cause that is the way it is decided to Be "structured".



The problem with your logic is that not all words are structured the same, and not all words came from the same origin. I'm guessing you didn't read the link I sent, because if you did you would know the prefixof "in" has multiple meanings, which has differences from the definition of the word "in".

Please learn the difference between a word and a prefix.


Also.. you type "be cause", when it is actually one word, thanks for proving yourself to me.

[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Always and all ways. We are together for ever as the consciousness and the energy that is Existence, that is Eternal.

Working together will Be fun ; ) Continue doing a great job keeping your cool and spreading messages as truthfull as possible.

Thank you,
Eternity Being



I'll get back to supporting my theory that "ants" has something to do with the UFO phenomenon in a moment. First i would like to share a thing with you.

Look at what is targetted first in war by attacking forces. If you cannot provide evidence that any of the things normally targetted by attacking or influencing forces has been compromised, then there is ABSOLUTLEY NO PROOF OF ANY CONSPIRACY!!

If we can prove that any resource normally targetted by infiltrating forces has been compromised, then we have proof of a real conspiracy.

Why cryptically encode scriptures of religions if the whole purpose is to get the message out in the open to as many people as you can? Then why did the authors of the bible encode their message? What motivating factors must have been in existance to make them do so? I ask this, because it has already been proven that this was the case. I see a contradiction that makes sense, only a few ways. Time travell being one of the ways that explains it. The subliminal imagination being another way that explains it. Alien influence, conspiracy, and god being a few more ways that explains it.

Here is a secret:

In the beginning God was ALONE
An acronym for Son Of Man is: SOM
The epitome of evil is supposedly HATE

So we add them together and get: ALONE SOM HATE

now subtract the letters from the word: SHALOME (hebrew greeting of peace)

ALONE SOM HATE
- SHALOME
__________________
= "A NOTE"



ALONE SOM HATE

first i subtract the S from SOM
Second i subtract the H from HATE
Third i subtract the A from hate, because ALONE is the alpha, and keeps it.
Fourth i subtract the L from ALONE
Fifth i subtract the O from ALONE
Sixth i subtract the M from SOM
Seventh i subtract the E from ALONE

What we are left with is: "A NOTE"

I do not subscribe to the belief that this is chance, but rather something that was encrypted consciously, by something.

_____________________________________

A sword in a stone?

draw from stone ...... phonetically:
drow from ston

drow from ston [mirror] nots morf word

knots morph word or notes morph word?

just another possible curious oddity.

Thanks for your time,
john



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher

In the beginning God was ALONE
An acronym for Son Of Man is: SOM
The epitome of evil is supposedly HATE

So we add them together and get: ALONE SOM HATE

now subtract the letters from the word: SHALOME (hebrew greeting of peace)

ALONE SOM HATE
- SHALOME



Wow man you are really grasping air right now. I'm really curious now as to if you have any clue how dumb that sounds? Maybe you should try looking at yourself from a 3rd person perspective... Ive never seen someone try so hard...

How do you come up with these? Are you using some kind of hallucinogenic substance? Are you using the word tools at poetry.com?

rhyme.poetry.com...

Seriously, do you really expect a lot of people to believe this?

I think you need to stop playing scrabble.



[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tiloke

For some reason , they felt it necessary for you to see 3 of them.....I wonder why?

The background investigation may be expanded if an applicant has resided abroad, or has a history of mental disorders, or drug or alcohol abuse. A personal interview will be conducted of the candidate.

Thats from the FBI website.


Warzones include the "abroad" category. It is also standard operating procedure concerning Critical Incident Stress Debriefings. So, i was obligated to follow protocol, and had no choice but to see psychiatrists after having been exposed to certain stimuli during numerous calls i've responded to over the last decade as a fire fighter in war zones.

May i suggest anyone who questions my mental status, or why i've seen psychiatrists google the term Critical Incident Stress Debriefings and see if they are a voluntary in nature for attending after seeing things i would rather spare you from the details of.

Source/Link:
www.emedicine.com...


For counseling to be effective with the emergency worker, the counselor must be familiar with the unique stressors of the practice of emergency medicine, EMS, and other emergency services. Not choosing a counselor, a psychologist, or a psychiatrist with this background can cause a failure to connect with the emergency services patient. This can delay treatment, cause harm, or push the individual in need away from the concept of counseling. Most CISM teams maintain a referral list of qualified counselors in their region for treating emergency services issues.


So, as i stated in an earlier post (which was not sufficient for some members) my having seen psychiatrists was a mandatory occurance for my job, and not due to abnormal behavior on my part, but rather due to having been exposed to ..... things i do not feel i need to go into to make my point, and ultimatley has no bearing on what this thread was intended to be about.



I don't have to "dispute" you, everyone else here has done it quite well, but in your twisted mind, you see them as proving you right.


Your labelling of me as having a "twisted mind" is not supported by anyone capable of making such a diagnosis. This is a diagnosis supported only by your perception, and perhaps those who support you perception. Not based upon fact.

Nor is everyone on here saying the same thing as you are concerning my mental status, and the FACT that you say everyone is proves you are somewhat distorting the facts, or not percieving reality yourself.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
In the beginning God was ALONE


I'd like to see your proof for this statement.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by SWAT Life
Ive never seen someone try so hard...


Thank you.



How do you come up with these?


You've already stated that i had proven myself to you by seperating the word because into be cause. If i have already proven myself to you, and you already have come to the conclusion that i am incompetent, why ask me any questions? I obviously don't know what i am talking about, either that or you were lying when you said i had proven myself to you.



Seriously, do you really expect a lot of people to believe this?


Seriously? Yes i do. Either believe it, or dispute the reasons i have supplied for doing it.

Thank you for your contributions,
john



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by SWAT Life
You, are completely wrong, and you need to study the origins of certain words. Words come from different places ....


The origin of certain words comes from the human psychi. Might i suggest it would be in our best interest to study the human psychi in order to study the origins of words?

If words com from different places than the human psychi, please provide supportive evidence for your claims.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by SWAT Life

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
In the beginning God was ALONE


I'd like to see your proof for this statement.


No. You don't want to see proof of this statement.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 02:58 PM
link   
But you said it was a interview for a security clearance, not a requirement for previous combat. I understand why you would change your story after being proven a liar though.
Being stationed oversees DOES NOT CONSTITUTE "residing in a foreign country". It does not or I would have had extra questioning because I was stationed in Korea before I got my clearance.
On top of that they wouldn't send you to a head-shrink because you were overseas. That would only constitute additional questioning by the quizzer, not a doctor. If your job sends you to a psychologist,especially 3 times, than there is a reason.


The background investigation may be expanded if an applicant has resided abroad, or has a history of mental disorders, or drug or alcohol abuse. A personal interview will be conducted of the candidate.


Do you really need me to break it down for you? If you resided abroad , the security specialist checks into it. If you had a problem with drugs or alcohal, a doctor checks you out to make sure your ok.

Whats left? "or has a history of mental disorders,".

Thats why you would see a head shrink...... and another... and another.


Once again, you attack those that question you(maybe to make us look "evil" for daring to question the all-knowing you) and ignore the most important part of my post.
So here it is again in bold.

The human mouth can only create about 40 different sounds. It is combinations of these sounds (rrr, shh, aaa,fff,) make the words we use today. Because our mouths can only make about 40 sounds, do you think it possible that in 5000 years of history and about 100 billion words, maybe some were used more than once?

And that is the last I will contribute to this foolishness.You changing your story only proves that you will not accept any reality other than the one in your head. You obviously live in your own little world where every word out there has some deep secret meaning, or you know this is a big con but you do it anyway.
You will get no more ATS points from me responding to the crap the comes from your keyboard.



Can anyone explain why LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal and Esotericteacher are never on at the same time? Or why their posts have the same spelling and grammatical errors? Why their posting habits (back to back to back) are identical? Of course, now that I've said that, You'll see them make a conscious effort to post at the same time, easy enough with a proxy server.



[edit on 31-1-2007 by Tiloke]



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 03:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
No. You don't want to see proof of this statement.


Excuse me, who are you to tell me what I want? I want evidence, proof, or some type of clarification of your statement. You can not throw out all these claims without some type of supporting evidence.

Its obvious you are continuing with your messed up theory, even after various decapitations of it.

I delcare this theory, dead.



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 03:18 PM
link   


If words com from different places than the human psychi, please provide supportive evidence for your claims.


Well I'll chuck my two cents in on this one. I would argue that perhaps the need for humans to communicate with one another comes from whatever makes up the psyche. To see and be seen, touch and touched, talking and listening etc, these things, the need to express ourselves in someway is an innate need.

But language I would argue is a function of the rational mind seeking to connect with someone else on a more practical and effecent manner and of course the language and how it evolved vary from region to region.

Which is why there are so many different languages on the planet. The need to communicate is the same but the tool the language itself is a product of a lot of different factors from place and time to culture of the people who developed the language. Which I personally believe are very important when trying to understand the meaning of a certain word.

Also I would say that since english is a language made up of many other languages that the root and source of the word is very important in interpreting it's intended meaning.

Having said that though I will also note that words and their meaning change over time in the same language.

For instance if this were oh say 1932 and I were to point out a young boy and say "My that Karl is going places. He's so gay and full of spunk!" nobody would bat an eye.

But I think we can all agree that the meaning of those words have changed over time, but does that in the end nullify their original meaning? I say no.

THough nowadays I'd probably say happy and hyper.

So I think knowing where the word comes from and it's orignal root meanings is as important as how the word is used today and of course broken down for analysis.

Just my opinion of course.

Spiderj



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 04:39 PM
link   


Originally posted by SWAT Life
LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal



Nice try but no cigar.


Thanks. Smoking is a bad habit and horrible for Human health, it is suicide.


I would love to teach you about the English language, but its not my job.


That is why it is only a few of Ours at this moment. Your willingness to Be a teacher is acknowledged and appreciated. We all teach each other and We all learn each other.


You, are completely wrong, and you need to study the origins of certain words.


The origins are from the future, Not the past.


Words come from different places, and not all of them have the same structure.


Every thing comes from the same place, conscious energy; energy that is consciousness.

Thank you for your "time"



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by SWAT Life

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal



The problem with your logic is that not all words are structured the same, and not all words came from the same origin.


No, that is the problem that was presented and fixed in the English language. It is unconsistent and words are accordingly structured as such.


I'm guessing you didn't read the link I sent, because if you did you would know the prefixof "in" has multiple meanings, which has differences from the definition of the word "in".


The above quote fits this previous quote. "The problem with your logic is that not all words are structured the same, and not all words came from the same origin. We can ?->re-move



posted on Jan, 31 2007 @ 05:21 PM
link   
If We all helped each other there would Be No miss takes, We will pass up Our own narcissistic needs when that day comes and uncontrollably bloom in to an Omnified cosmic utopia



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join