Disc Low? Sure! Disc lo sure ....... Disclosure? Ants perhaps? **Speculative**

I know I said I was leaving , but I had to post this.

This is ridiculous, your obviously responding to your own threads with a different screen-name.


SAME EXACT style of posting.

Same back to back to back posts.

Same spelling and grammatical errors,

And your never on at the same time...


It seems odd that the only 2 people that think this thread is anything but nonsense, also happen to be so identical in unorthodox posting behavior.

Originally posted by Tiloke
But you said it was a interview for a security clearance, not a requirement for previous combat.

No i did not say this. Please review the post you are reffering to. Not all conversations i have had with psychiatrists were for the same reasons. And i was responding to an inquiry about having shared time with numerous psychiatrists. One may have been a requirement for a security clearance, but not all of them.

I understand why you would change your story after being proven a liar though.

I have not changed my story. And yet again in a weak attempt to degrade my integrity you have not proven me a liar, you have only proven your inability to percieve reality.

Pretty soon i will no longer reply to inquiries concerning my integrity, or my mental status. You are not fit to judge either sufficiently.

Being stationed oversees DOES NOT CONSTITUTE "residing in a foreign country". It does not or I would have had extra questioning because I was stationed in Korea before I got my clearance.

No comment.

On top of that they wouldn't send you to a head-shrink because you were overseas. That would only constitute additional questioning by the quizzer, not a doctor. If your job sends you to a psychologist,especially 3 times, than there is a reason.

Yawn. I bet your not really reading this at all.

The background investigation may be expanded if an applicant has resided abroad, or has a history of mental disorders, or drug or alcohol abuse. A personal interview will be conducted of the candidate.

Do you really need me to break it down for you? If you resided abroad , the security specialist checks into it. If you had a problem with drugs or alcohal, a doctor checks you out to make sure your ok.

Whats left? "or has a history of mental disorders,".

Thats why you would see a head shrink...... and another... and another.

.

Once again, you attack those that question you(maybe to make us look "evil" for daring to question the all-knowing you) and ignore the most important part of my post.
So here it is again in bold.

The human mouth can only create about 40 different sounds. It is combinations of these sounds (rrr, shh, aaa,fff,) make the words we use today. Because our mouths can only make about 40 sounds, do you think it possible that in 5000 years of history and about 100 billion words, maybe some were used more than once?

I'll answer your question, and then you answer mine. Yes, it is possible that some words have been used more than once in the last 5,000 years.

People have proven inept of percieving the truth about 250 years of reality. What makes us think people have a clue about the other 4,750 years? (rhetorical question, no answer needed.)

The question i ask you is:

Who road horseback 345 miles to warn the colonialists that the British were coming at the onset of the American Revolutionary War?

And that is the last I will contribute to this foolishness.You changing your story only proves that you will not accept any reality other than the one in your head.

Please provide a quote where i have "changed my story". You call my integrity into question, yet you can not provide evidence for me lacking integrity.

Can anyone explain why LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal and Esotericteacher are never on at the same time? Or why their posts have the same spelling and grammatical errors? Why their posting habits (back to back to back) are identical? Of course, now that I've said that, You'll see them make a conscious effort to post at the same time, easy enough with a proxy server.

Now who is reaching after failing to debate facts accuratley?


Editted to change "Civil War" to "Revolutionary War" in the question i posed. Sorry for my mistake.


[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

Originally posted by Tiloke
I know I said I was leaving , but I had to post this.

This is ridiculous, your obviously responding to your own threads with a different screen-name.


SAME EXACT style of posting.

Same back to back to back posts.

Same spelling and grammatical errors,

And your never on at the same time...


It seems odd that the only 2 people that think this thread is anything but nonsense, also happen to be so identical in unorthodox posting behavior.

And if they validate we are not the same person, then would the possibility exist that i am also the mod?

Thanks in advance to myself for sticking up for myself

If you don't have enough empathy to communicate effectivley in the hear and, how can one have enough empathy to begin to foresee problems that may develop in the future?

It's not my language i'm "dissecting", but rather the language i've adopted from the society i've grown up in.

Add down inside ANT age

Add Down ANT age

An arrow pointing down looks like: V

Add V ANT age
Ad V ANT age

Advantage.

Do you have a list of the rules you use to 'decipher' these messages? There seems to be many, and it appears you are using different rules to achieve these codes.

Why disc, low, sure?

Why not Dis Close ur ? - Dis Clothes Her - Dis her clothes -

or Disclose Her

I'd like to get interested in this, but as it is now, there is no consistency in your manipulation.

Originally posted by Tiloke
You changing your story only proves that you will not accept any reality other than the one in your head.

I did not change my "story":

It was a manditory job requirement, and it is also a neccesity for holding certain security clearances.

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Why is it yours or mine? We are all Us.

Are you kidding me? Really, you must be joking...

When I said YOUR logic, I was talking about this nonsense you posted:

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
then it can Be said yellow really means green, be cause that is the way it is decided to Be "structured".

...that is YOUR logic above, nobody else's. WTF is this kind of reasoning? Where did you come up with the reply, "Why is it yours or mine? We are all Us." That is just straight B.S. jibber jabber. Also, why on Earth do you capitalize "Be"???

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal

Originally posted by SWAT LifeAlso.. you typed "be cause", when it is actually one word, thanks for proving yourself to me.

You are, well come. Every thing is two words and Everything is two words, can you see it? No thing is two words and Nothing is two words, can you see it?

I don't know a nice way to say this....

....go back to school, and take an English class. I think they teach compound words in 2nd Grade.




[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]

Originally posted by SWAT Life

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
No. You don't want to see proof of this statement.

Excuse me, who are you to tell me what I want?

I'm nobody to tell you what you want, this is true. However, drawing upon all i know as a basis for reference, you would know if you wanted to bad enough. I can not supply you with what you want, if you do not want it bad enough.

I want evidence, proof, or some type of clarification of your statement.

Then want it more than you want anything and everything else. If the truth is what you want more than anything else, i'm confident you'll find it.

People prioritize. If our priority is not the truth, then our top priority must stand between us and the truth.

To me the word "God" is another word for what someone's top priority is to them.

To me the word "God" and the word "Truth" are interchangable.

You can not throw out all these claims without some type of supporting evidence.

I supplied supportive evidence. The references i supplied the members of this forum with were not disputed, but rather my mental status and integrity were called into question, which has distracted this thread to the point where it is now.

Its obvious you are continuing with your messed up theory, even after various decapitations of it.

Where has the theory been decapitated?

I'm requesting the above member "Esoteric Teacher" to be banned for disobeying the number 1 rule of posting.

1). Posting: You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This entire thread is misleading and inaccurate. Also, he continues to lie and say he has supplied supportive evidence, yet his only supportive evidence is more of his misleading and inaccurate text in other threads.

I asked for supporting evidence after he said the underlined text:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher


In the beginning God was ALONE
An acronym for Son Of Man is: SOM
The epitome of evil is supposedly HATE

So we add them together and get: ALONE SOM HATE

now subtract the letters from the word: SHALOME (hebrew greeting of peace)

ALONE SOM HATE
- SHALOME

..but he doesn't supply evidence, and continues to post knowingly false information that:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I supplied supportive evidence.

This is grounds for being banned. IMO

Originally posted by nextguyinline
Do you have a list of the rules you use to 'decipher' these messages?

Thank you.

Yes, i do. Religious texts supply the rules i apply to decipher messages, the torah, the bible, which i strongly suspect the subconscious mind is doing naturally, due to our internal mechanisms and the numerous forms of communication that are taking place in our body.

The rules i abide by are any combination of any verses of the bible which can be applied to words and phrases. I do this because i believe it is one possible interpretation of the torah, and bible. I think the Gospell and Go Spell are another example of this.

There seems to be many, and it appears you are using different rules to achieve these codes.

I understand that it seems that i am arbitrarily doing this, but i assure you i am not.

I ask myself: "why encode messages into ancient texts if the purpose of the ancient texts is to spread the word, and the truth?"

The rules i apply are my subconscious's interpretation of bible verses i am familiar with, and i see truthfull parallels when i apply any combination of any "rules" of the ancient scriptures.

Why apply the rules of the bible to the bible?

Because if a bible code does exist, then the bible must be at least part of the clue to unlocking such a code, or codes.

Also, according to ancient and oral traditions, Moses once said to his brother Aaron "Everything that has happened, or ever will happen has been encoded into the Torah"

And i also reviewed other scholars' works to see if there were any findings or verses that would support such a theory (although i suspect many know). I found in the apocrypha book that was left out of the bible by the early church "The Acts of Peter" where Peter, the first pontif, said near his death as he hung upside down on the cross: (paraphrasing) "To understand the Mystery of the Kingdom of Heaven make what is on the left as that on the right, that which is on the left as that which is on the right, that which is up down, and that which is down up".

I've supplied a link to the supportive evidence in an earlier post on this thread, but i will provide it again soon.

The rules i follow are what i believe the bible and other ancient texts say to do.

Why? The bible says:
"Judge not, lest thee be judged"

Yet, i felt as though the ideals behind the bible judge me, so by the bible's own admission, since the bible judges me, it also gives me permission to judge it. But according to what? It's just words, right?

The Bible says:
"In the beginning there was the word, and the word was with God"
and in some versions the bible says (God's voice) "I am the word"

So, assuming the word "word" means "words and language", then we have permission to judge the words by ..... the words, which i am not the first to assume is what may have been meant.

So what words do we apply to the words?

Any verse or phrase from the bible that can be applied to the words or phrases.

The bible says:
"The meek shall inherit the Earth"

To me this could also mean using lower case letters.

The bible says:
"We are not in the Kingdom of Heaven, but we are in Lucifer's dominion"i believe i may be paraphrasing here. However, if you ask around i believe most people would agree we are not in heaven, so perhaps we are where everything is opposite that of the Kingdom of Heaven, to include letters.

So, this is one justification for reversing or mirroring the letters, and words. I would also like to point to the fact that there have been court cases in the past 20 years in America where people took bands to court because they believed reversed subliminal messages had been implanted into musical lyrics. Why would the court systems of America entertain such an idea if there wasn't some level of truth to it? Why would American tax payers not mind that tax dollars were being spent on such things if thers wasn't truth to it?

These are some examples of the "rules" i use, which are not arbitrary, but rather what the ancient texts say to do, i believe, as do others.

I also notice the bible reverences innocent minds, pure minds, and children. So, why not think like a child, which is perhaps what some part of our subconscious mind is doing, i believe.

You said

There seems to be many, and it appears you are using different rules to achieve these codes.

Here are some of the "rules" i use:

1) Spell the word or syllables out phonetically, like the mind of a child
2) Reverse or mirror image the syllables, words, or phrases
3) Find the correct spelling, grammar, for the finding after doing the last 2 steps.
4) Using lower case letters.
5) I acknowledge what each letter may mean as a symbol, or what correlation my mind may make to a symbol. For instance a T or a t could mean add, plus, in addition to, a cross, across(distance).

Since we are not usually aware of what is transpiring in our subconscious mind, and it is where the majority of brain activity is, as well as where all sensory input goes first, it stands to reason that perhaps we are not consciously aware of most of our own thoughts. so who is?

I suggest there is a portion of our mind that has the intent to always remain true to ourselves. And since our inherited instinct is "Self Pre-Serve", we must know what has the potential to harm us in order to recognize what threatens the cellular embedded prime command of Self Pre-Serve. In order for us to be capable of percieving a threat, i believe fear is the natural by-product of self preservation. And, since there may indeed be a portion of our subconscious assigned to quantifying all possible fears, that part of our subconscious keeps calculating, growing like a computer virus, needing more room to count all possible fears, taking more and more mind space from our conscious minds ...... counting the possible threats, imagined or real ....

And what was one of the names attributed to God?

Abba, right?

Abba Cuss = Abacuss, the second word in the dictionary after "A".

What does abacuss mean? It's an instrument from the Far East used to count.

If we are subject to fear and our instinct of self preserve, and a part of our mind is calculating exponentially all possible things to fear ......

God Speaks: "I Know All Things"

The Accuser Speaks: "Then, if you know all things, What is the highest number?"

If a God exists, when can we expect God's return and and answer to what the highest number is?

My point? Perhaps some portion of our subconcious minds are doing the same thing.

Why disc, low, sure?

Why not Dis Close ur ? - Dis Clothes Her - Dis her clothes -

or Disclose Her

What we find is a reflection of how our minds are conditioned, and also dependent upon our moods. How our thought processes are affected, and our actions and behaviors are influenced, may be a mixture of our intentions and language itself.

I'd like to get interested in this, but as it is now, there is no consistency in your manipulation.

I understand it seems there is no consistancy. I this is my failure to find the right words to properly explain what it is i am trying to convey. I do not think for one second that it is a failure on your part to see it, but rather a failure on my part to provide the right words. I whole heartedly apologize for this, as i feel i am the one failing. I persist because in my mind i feel i am obligated to do so.

I hope this in some measure further explains this better.

Although i am collecting more ways to say the same thing, the words sometimes are hard to find. Perhaps the abstract is still a variable...

Thanks for post, and the relevent questions, and your time,
john paul

[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

Originally posted by SWAT Life
I'm requesting the above member "Esoteric Teacher" to be banned for disobeying the number 1 rule of posting.

1). Posting: You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This entire thread is misleading and inaccurate. Also, he continues to lie and say he has supplied supportive evidence, yet his only supportive evidence is more of his misleading and inaccurate text in other threads.

I asked for supporting evidence after he said the underlined text:

Yet, you were supplied a link prior to the underlined post, and the link provides the proof i have been neither misleading, nor inaccurate. Here, yet again, is the link to the thread in which i supply the logic for doing what it is i am doing:
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

..but he doesn't supply evidence, and continues to post knowingly false information that:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I supplied supportive evidence.

Liar. Proof:

Hey, look what i found on page one of this thread:

Then PLEASE feel free to dispute the logic:
www.abovetopsecret.com...'
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

www.abovetopsecret.com...'

This is grounds for being banned. IMO

What is?
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Here is justification for this theory, AGAIN:
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Thanks,
john


P.S.www.abovetopsecret.com...'



[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

Originally posted by SWAT Life

...that is YOUR logic above, nobody else's.

Because you know you have the authority to speak for everybody else.

Far be it for me to contend with your logic.

Esoteric Teacher

E sot eric T cher

He sought Eric T-shirt.

Perhaps if we all look for Eric's t-shirt we might find a witty motto on the front explaining all this nonsense.

non sense

no sense. none. whatsoever.

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher

Here is justification for this theory, AGAIN:

I find it quiet funny that you think I'm asking for evidence of your theory. When I was only asking evidence for your statement. Which statement? This one:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
In the beginning God was ALONE

..that is why I asked this:

Originally posted by SWAT Life
I'd like to see your proof for this statement.

..then you said this:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
No. You don't want to see proof of this statement.

...and you still didn't provide proof, yet you wrote this soon after:

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I supplied supportive evidence.

You did NOT supply supportive evidence for the statement. Yet you used that statement to help your theory. Why on Earth would you use a statement that does not have supportive evidence to help your theory?

You are misleading people, with inaccurate info, without supporting evidence of the info, in order to support your theory, and then you lie and say you supplied evidence. Which is grounds for being banned I.M.O.

[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

Wow. You must know more than Einstien's role model, Sir Isaac Newton:

Source/Link:
en.wikipedia.org...

Though he is better known for his love of science, the Bible was Sir Isaac Newton's greatest passion. He devoted more time to the study of Scripture than to science, and said, "I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by those who were inspired. I study the Bible daily." He spent a great deal of time trying to discover hidden messages within the Bible (See Bible code).

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, Michael Drosnin, and the prophet Isaiah:

Source/Link:
www.triumphpro.com...

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, a once-in-a-millennium scholar, as he has been called, was interviewed by Michael Drosnin, and was asked about the possibility of Bible codes. Noting an odd quirk of the Hebrew Text, he declared, “In the Bible time is reversed. The future is always written in the past tense, and the past is always written in the future tense.” No one knows why, he said.

Turning to the book of Isaiah, he related, “Here, in Isaiah, it says you need to look backwards to see the future.” He went on, “When Isaiah says, ‘Tell the things that are to come hereafter,’ you can translate the same words to read: ‘They told the future backwards.’ In fact, you can translate the same words to read, ‘Tell the letters in reverse.’ It’s like mirror writing” (p.175).

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than thousands of years of Jewish oral traditions:

Source/Link:
digilander.iol.it...

A 3,000 years old tradition states that God dictated the Torah, (i.e. The Law, the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Old Testament), to Moses, in a precise letter by letter sequence, and that historic events, past, present and future, are encoded in the Hebrew Scriptures by an encryption system which can be described and unlocked.

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than Rabbi Moses Cordevaro

During the Middle Ages a famous rabbi, Moses Cordevaro, wrote “The secrets of the Torah are revealed..in the skipping of letters”. In the 18th century the greatest Jewish thinker of his time, Rabbi ElijahSolomon, known as the Vilna Gaon, said“All that was, is, and will be unto the end of time is included in the Torah, the first five books of the Bible”.

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than Jesus:

Many Christians have a hard time believing in the existence of "hidden codes" in the Bible because they say that God reveals information to us in the Bible rather than hiding information. However, this view actually contradicts Scripture, because the Bible specifically says that God hides certain information from people while causing it to be understandable to other people!
Let's take a look at some examples in the Bible, and we will begin to see that there definitely is information hidden in the Bible in a variety of ways:
1. Jesus Himself tells us that God deliberately hides certain information from some people while causing it to be understandable to other people:
"At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children."" (Matthew 11:25)

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than Edgar Cayce:
Even in Edgar Cayce's readings we find support for believing that language may be encoded. The following excerpt is from 5747-3 of Cayce's catalogued readings.

It is given in thy writings of Scripture, although in a hidden manner, ye may observe if ye will look.
-- The Edgar Cayce Companion (Compiled by B. Ernest Frejer) page 173, reading #5747-3

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

WOW. You must know more than The FACTS & The TRUTH:


PROOF THE BIBLE WAS ENCODED:

10. There is a simple type of code that can be created by writing down the letters of the alphabet, and then underneath writing the letters in reverse order like this:
11. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
12. ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
Using this system, we can write the word "TORAH" in code by finding the T in the top row and replacing it with the letter just beneath it (G). Continuing with this substitution we end up with the word "TORAH" being encoded as "GLIZS."
This was a common form of code in ancient Hebrew writings, and it is referred to as "Atbash" (see for example Basic Concepts in Data Encryption). The Bible contains several examples of words written in the Atbash code, such as the following:
"and all the kings of the north, near and far, one after the other--all the kingdoms on the face of the earth. And after all of them, the king of Sheshach will drink it too." (Jeremiah 25:26)
"How Sheshach will be captured, the boast of the whole earth seized! What a horror Babylon will be among the nations!" (Jeremiah 51:41)
"This is what the LORD says: "See, I will stir up the spirit of a destroyer against Babylon and the people of Leb Kamai."" (Jeremiah 51:1)
In Hebrew, the word "Sheshach" is actually the word "Babylon" written in the Atbash code. Similarly, the term "Leb Kamai" is actually the word "Chaldea" (the archaic name of Babylon) written in the Atbash code. The footnotes for Jeremiah 25:26 and Jeremiah 51:41 in the NIV Bible say that "Sheshach is a cryptogram for Babylon." The footnote for Jeremiah 51:1 in the NIV Bible says that "Leb Kamai is a cryptogram for Chaldea, that is, Babylon."
This is another example of hidden information being deliberately encoded in the Bible.
13. Ancient Jewish tradition says that there are "70 gates of wisdom," meaning that there are 70 ways of interpreting the Torah. "Skipping letters" is said to be the 50th way (see Cracking the Bible Code, Dr. Jeffrey Satinover). This refers to a type of code in which words are formed by starting on a particular letter in a document and then skipping, say, every 10 letters until the hidden message is spelled out.

Originally posted by whitewave

no sense. none. whatsoever.

I wager all that i have to bet with that you are mistaken.

How sure are you that this makes no sense? What are you willing to wager?

easy on your knees, yet?

"ease knees on" spelled out phonetically:

es nes on .... letters reversed: no sen se

add them together.





[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]

To add to your violation of the T.O.S. you have derailed this subject and went off topic in order to avoid questions that I have asked.

The topic title is:

Disc Low? Sure! Disc lo sure ....... Disclosure? Ants perhaps? **Speculative**

I asked you simple questions about UFO's and the word "disclosure". You failed to answer them. This was the question:

Originally posted by SWAT Life
Do you truely believe that when the word disclosure was created, that the existance of UFO's was being hidden, or suppressed?

..you never answered that question, but instead continued giving more example of your theory, and going off topic.

LISTEN, your so called "evidence" is explaining how the BIBLE had hidden code in HEBREW.

NOT THE ENTIRE ENGLISH DICTIONARY, AND EVERY WORD IN THE KNOWN UNIVERSE!!"




[edit on 31-1-2007 by SWAT Life]

Originally posted by SWAT Life

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher

Here is justification for this theory, AGAIN:

I find it quiet funny that you think I'm asking for evidence of your theory. When I was only asking evidence for your statement. Which statement? This one:

It brings me great joy to know that you find it funny. I like knowing you are amused, it's important to me.

i've already conceded i could not provide proof of that statement 6 posts ago, but i attribute the cause for this to be your mindset, and my inability to properly state my theory (adopted theory) into words you can relate to.
I apologize for this.

6 posts ago:

quote: Originally posted by SWAT Life

quote: Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
No. You don't want to see proof of this statement.


Excuse me, who are you to tell me what I want?

I'm nobody to tell you what you want, this is true. However, drawing upon all i know as a basis for reference, you would know if you wanted to bad enough. I can not supply you with what you want, if you do not want it bad enough.

You are misleading people, with inaccurate info, without supporting evidence of the info, in order to support your theory, and then you lie and say you supplied evidence. Which is grounds for being banned I.M.O.

And you are most certainly entitled to your opinion.

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher

i've already conceded i could not provide proof of that statement 6 posts ago

Then you agree that you are misleading people by using unsupported evidence to support your theory.

Originally posted by SWAT Life
To add to your violation of the T.O.S. you have derailed this subject and went off topic in order to avoid questions that I have asked.

Then put in a complaint via the member center, or U2U the mods until you find one who agrees with you.

I asked you simple questions about UFO's and the word "disclosure". You failed to answer them. This was the question:

Originally posted by SWAT Life
Do you truely believe that when the word disclosure was created, that the existance of UFO's was being hidden, or suppressed?

..you never answered that question, but instead continued giving more example of your theory, and going off topic.

Enough. I did not go off topic. I addressed the question that preceeded the question you are referencing, which to me was the same question as the other 3, just worded differently:

You said:

quote:
Are you insisting that the word was only created because of UFO's?

This is hard to answer, due to the fact i think there may be more than one cause that leads to the effect that our languages are encoded. It's not what i am insisting, but rather something i am not ruling out.

Thanks,
john

How far off topic was my response to your question?

How different was this question i answered to the question i did not reply to?

[edit on 31-1-2007 by Esoteric Teacher]