Will Hillary Clinton Be The Next U.S. President?

For some of the latest information.



To quote for the popular culcher, it seems the &$@#! is back.

reply to post by RedGolem

---

I assume Ms R/G, you were attempting to type "the enchanting Mrs. Clinton" and your keyboard miscued?

Although Hillary may not receive the majority of Texas delegates, she did win the majority of votes. Ohio was a smashing victory for Hillary. Clinton polled more votes (1.2 million) than all 3 GOP candidates, McCain, Huckabee and Paul, combined, who aggregated just over 1 million votes! Obama polled an “extra” 976,000 votes! This surely bodes ill for the GOP in November. Even Diebold cannot carry Ohio for the GOP this time!

I think Hillary has the advantage now. Only a bad loss in PA will stop her from being the Party's nominee!

[edit on 3/6/2008 by donwhite]

Although Hillery is below Obama in the votes gathered so far it seems she could still win the nomination. If any one still has any opinions they want to share on this topic please do so.
Here is some of the latest news on the subject.

just finished watching this vid of Hillary being interviewed by O'Reilly.
You gotta see/hear it to believe it.

YouTube Link

reply to post by toreishi

---

I must have the oldest computer on ATS as my computer will not play that except in short fragments that make listening an unhappy experience. I saw one like it on tv and the part I liked best was Hillary standing up to O'Reilly's obnoxious interview technique. A Joseph McCarthy, Jr.

I did not like it when she said "If Iran attacked Israel, we'd obliterate Iran." If elected, she'll have to EAT those words. But every pol know how to do that. But yet a substantial segment of the American electorate LOVES it! Israel has 20-300 atom bombs in contravention of the UN's NPT but the US ignores that.

As Rev Wright explained, a politician says what he/she has to say to be elected. Then you get down to business. If you don't get elected, you're nothing. I've learned one thing - you cannot be elected if you tell the truth!

[edit on 5/2/2008 by donwhite]

For everything that was said thus far I agree the most with that politicians say what they have to say to get elected. I think that has been proven often enough through my life time and I am sure through most of history.

I totally agree that Hillary will be the next president. She attended the last Bilderberg Group meeting and we know they hold the pursestrings

reply to post by RedGolem

---

To help simplify this, I have a pet theory I call the “dichotomy of convergences.” Two ways to reach a common goal. Or coming together from different directions. When not telling the truth serves us the best. The speaker needs to be very discrete how he or she misrepresents the truth of the attainable. That - the attainable - warns us not to encourage false hopes. Also known as the "whipsaw" theory.

I like to point to the GOP primary in Michigan. Romney who was favored to win, assured the voters he would bring back the jobs lost to globalization. He suggested a $20 b. program for MI. McCain told the voters that those jobs are not coming back. He offered to improve or extend the retraining efforts to qualify the out of work auto makers in other fields. Romney misstated the truth, and he won. McCain told the truth and he lost.

Clinton and McCain are offering to drop the gas tax this summer if elected or if they can force Bush43 to do it. But it turns out the Federal gas tax is 18 cents a gallon. If you drive a 20 mpg vehicle, for 800 miles a month for June, July and August, that would save you $21.60. Obama says that is PANDERING at its worst and refuses to indulge.

We’ll see what effect if any that dichotomy of promises has in Indiana and North Carolina this Tuesday.

[edit on 5/4/2008 by donwhite]

I found this as I was looking at news this morning.

cnn

I can re state the point that was made many times earlier, that Clinton controls the money in this race. The other main point is that she is loaning the money to here own campaign. That means she will be getting it all back with interest! So is that a sweet deal or what. Loan your business venture money, spend it to woo your supporters, then get your supporters to give you a bunch of money, so you end up with more then what your started out with.

The source goes on to say that Clinton has loaned here campaign eleven million so far. At twenty percent interest we are talking two million one hundred thousand net profit. If that is how it all will work in the end.

Here is some of the latest in what the news is saying

cnn

reply to post by RedGolem

---

I sometimes feel I am riding the back of an Asian camel. First it’s up then it’s down. I started life as a Hillary person. Then, after the outstanding speech by Barack explaining his relationship with the Very Reverend Jeremiah Wright, I said, “That man has presidential potential!” Then Hillary made a smaller but just as crucial “second” comeback. Then, just this past Sunday, I was watching the Barack interview by Wolf Blitzer and again, I was so strongly impressed by the grasp of issues and exhaustive background knowledge Barack showed. Sweet Jesus! Barack is as ready to step into the WH as is Hillary!

As backup for any Dem nominee, NO ONE could do a worse job than the current occupant, America’s FIRST designated president. No, the 2004 election did not “cure” the unexpected Supreme Court’s bungling of the 2000 election. He was illegitimate then and he remains non-vindicated and he is still very much ILLEGITIMATE.

[edit on 05/05/2008 by donwhite]