Will Hillary Clinton Be The Next U.S. President?, page 14
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14    15    16    17  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 10:18 AM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



OK, Ms R/G, you have a one-upmanship on me. Mr Hsu is really in deep do-do. I made a wrong assumption. Even smart people do dumb things.

Hillary has returned the $800,000, but to who? Mr Hsu? He was on the run. Or was he bundling? Hmm? Of course, those “bundled” donors may still want to support Hillary and so she may get $800,000 back by return mail? Aside: A more intimate form of bundling was practiced in 18th and 19th century America when young men courting a girl would stay overnight. Both slept in the same bed, but were separated by a ‘bundling board’ to keep them honest and her not pregnant. End.

As for globalists. Although I never paid the annual dues, I have in the past subscribed to the Foreign Affairs Quarterly. The CFR has represented the best thinking in America much too long for me to remember. Because it is generally pro internationalist, the Republican Party - after the 1912 election steadfastly anti-internationalist - and its standard bearers - excluding Eisenhower and Nixon - have most frequently taken the position opposite to that taken by the CFR. There has followed a lot of gratuitous slander hurled by people who knew better. Which is disappointing. Poorly informed voters are befuddled and have often voted against their own long term best interest thinking they were doing just the opposite. Voters tend to be checker players, high level politicians prefer chess.

Globalism neither can be nor should be reversed. Almost all of the West or Euro states have morphed from industrial giants into service economies.

I equate wealth with material things. Unless you create something I can hold or see, you have not created wealth. Instead, you - the generic - are mystified by the stacks of money paid for shuffling assets. I deny a service economy can be permanent because it creates NOTHING. It is not clear to me how long it - a service economy - can exist before the FINAL accounting comes. A service economy most closely resembles the illegal Ponzi schemes. But as the adage goes, you “Never Look A Gift Horse In The Mouth!” Or, if that is not right on point, try "Never Bite the Hand That Feeds You."

The vexing issue is how to convert from a manufacturing base to a service base in a way that is fair to all the people involved. I cannot offer any help on that.

[edit on 9/25/2007 by donwhite]



reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 07:14 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by donwhite



Donwhite
Thanks for the comment. As to the eight hundred thousand dollars I some how think it will find its way back to Clinton's campaign with out to much trouble. As I said at the start of the thread she does control the money or at least the biggest chunk of it.
As to the service economy being fair to everybody, I don't any society with a hierarchy will ever be fair. As who ever is at the top will always have more then the thralls. That is the extreme. But the point is we live in a complex society with those who will always have more then others.


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 01:21 PM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



I’m guessing. I think Hillary is 60 years old. She was an honors grad from Wellesley College. She graduated from law school and began practice in a prestigious Arkansas firm. From the first day she took that job until today she has been in politics. I believe her husband ran for attorney general of Arkansas. He won once and lost once. He went on to be governor 3 terms. 2 years each. Then he ran for the presidency in 1992. He must have started that run 2-4 years earlier. She’s got 30 years experience in and around politics. 8 years in the WH put her at the very center of power in America. The place where America’s Movers and Shakers meet to eat.

I believe Barack is in his early 40s. He has terms of service in the Illinois state senate. That is an important post and comes into contact with a lot of big problems in a big state with a big city. You could call it a microcosm of America. But still, he’s far short of the experience Hillary has acquired. She’s hosted more state dinners than Barack has time in government.

John Edwards is a highly successful trial lawyer. Although many people dumbly denigrate lawyers, it is ONLY lawyers who can get them a DAY in court. Republicans have tried from Ronnie Reagan to Bush43 to get lawyer BARRED from the courtroom. Stymied class-action suits. Limited legal fees. Shortened statute of limitations. Republicans are always trying to make BIG Money exempt from answering in Court to the little guy they exploit and bring harm to. A one term US senator, he too has experience but not to equal Hillary’s. Or Barack's. And John suffers from one malady he cannot seem to get over: He is a populist.

Populism does not resonate in America.

November 4, 2008 is 1 year, 1 month and 4 days off. 399 days. IF Hillary can avoid a faux pas for that terribly long period of time, then she will be our next president. A FIRST for America! And I predict Barack will be her vice president. ANOTHER FIRST for America. Say Hello Democrats! Say good by to Republicans of the dinosaur-type.

[edit on 9/30/2007 by donwhite]


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 06:21 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by donwhite



Donwhite,
Thanks for your post. You made some very good points, and you could be right that Hillery could be the next president with Obama as the running mate. However there is one more point that some one else pointed out. That the U.S. has never had a female president or a black one, those two points could work against them. It was pointed out that could be the very situation the republicans want, as that is the situation that will keep the republicans in office.


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 07:30 PM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



Yes, there is a very good line of thinking that goes DON’T push the public TOO far TOO fast. But sometimes you have to DO right and let the Devil take the hindmost.

From another thread: Early on I believed Bill Richardson - an unlikely Hispanic - from the West and a small state too, would be an ideal counterbalance to Hillary from NY and so on. But Barack has done TOO well to be ignored. America’s blacks have been true and faithful to the Dems since 1932. With Barack running a strong 2nd and for a long time it is inconceivable the Dems will not offer him the VP slot. Sure, you could argue Barack will not get more black votes than the Dems would have without him, but surely blacks are due a reward? And a lot of whites would vote for him, I believe. Well, maybe not in TN but elsewhere.



reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 05:56 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by donwhite



I don't particular like the idea of letting the devil take the coarse, you said it something like that I think.
Something else I think needs to be thought of, is not will Obama, be the running mate, but if he is the running mate will Hillery draw the ethnic vote.


reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 06:50 PM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



RedGolem I don't particular like the idea of letting the devil take the coarse, you said it something like that I think. Something else I think needs to be thought of, is not will Obama, be the running mate, but if he is the running mate will Hillary draw the ethnic vote.

OK, assume for whatever reason Barack is not the VP nominee on the Dems ticket. It does not matter for this speculation who the #2 slot goes to. The question is will the black voters still support Hillary? I say YES!

The black voter can’t go anywhere else. The real question is HOW many black voters will turn out? For very understandable reasons blacks do not vote in the same percentages as white or Hispanic voters. Republicans are hard at work all around the country to block black voters. They have the picture ID requirement in 17 states that is in the Supreme Court this session. Disguised as an anti-fraud measure, it reality it is one more attempt by the GOP to stop blacks from voting.

Yes, Hillary will get the ethnic vote.


reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 07:05 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by donwhite



Ok so you think Hillery will still get the ethnic vote. Fine and I am sure all the experts will probably agree with you. I however don't think the photo ID is any way to keep any one group of people from being able to vote. Or if it is a way to keep any one group from voting I would have to think it would be the Hispanics, as they are the largest portion of people who are here illegally.


reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 09:24 PM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



RedGolem I however don't think the photo ID is any way to keep any one group of people from being able to vote. Or if it is a way to keep any one group from voting I would have to think it would be the Hispanics, as they are the largest portion of people who are here illegally.

It is claimed that many blacks who are eligible to vote do not have a car or a driver’s license, which is the most common photo ID. This is the same situation with old people, many who have quit driving. Lack of a photo ID is predominately a minority, poor and old people phenomenon.

I don’t think many illegal immigrants will be voting. Only citizens and Green Card holders - permanent resident status - are entitled to vote. The undocumented persons here know that and don’t want to bring attention to themselves. I don’t think the photo ID issue will effect them.

[edit on 10/1/2007 by donwhite]


reply posted on 2-10-2007 @ 05:01 AM by RedGolem
reply to post by donwhite



A state issued photo id is also very easy to get. I just renewed my licence and I did it all on there web site. Did not half to go to try to find there building.
Any way as I said at the start of the thread, I think Hillery will win because she controls the money, or the biggest chunk of the money.


reply posted on 2-10-2007 @ 08:16 AM by donwhite
reply to post by RedGolem



RedGolem A state issued photo id is also very easy to get. I just renewed my licence and I did it all on there web site. Did not half to go to try to find there building. Any way as I said at the start of the thread, I think Hillary will win because she controls the money, or the biggest chunk of the money.

Suppose you are a single parent family with 2-3 small children. You live off food stamps, rent assistance and whatever passes for AFDC. You own no car. In fact, you can't even drive. So how do you get to the license issue place to get a photo ID that cots money? That money would buy a gallon of milk. priorities.

Renewal via the internet can be done in FL, too. Of course, you don’t get a new picture. My sister decided to go to the office for a new picture the last time she renewed her license because the picture was getting TOO much out of date.

Actually, I think Barack has raised the most money. I heard it continues, and it was $20 m to $17 m between her and him. I suspect she has a list of READY donors should the emergency arise. Like in stud poker, you don’t show your hole cards.

I love her new hairdo. She dresses chic. She has aged well! I think she is at last in her element! She actually LOVES this campaigning! She is head and shoulders above the other Dems and the GOPs wanna-be’s. And, her “chunk” of money is big enough!

[edit on 10/2/2007 by donwhite]


reply posted on 27-11-2007 @ 07:45 AM by RedGolem
Hear is so more information on Hillery. I still do think this will be an interesting year ahead in U.S. politics.
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14    15    16    17  >>    ^^TOP^^



Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 16 days ago with 1 member flags
Rwanda deports Canadian Double-Parking Suspect
  Posted 19 days ago with 0 member flags
A Protest Technique From Russia (Lighten up OWS)
  Posted 12 days ago with 0 member flags