Originally posted by Agit8dChop
As always seeker a pleasure to read your pointless filth!
Yeah you were on ignore, but after another thread about ignores, and watching people quote you and make a fool of your ramblings, I couldnt let
everyone have the fun could I.
Your 'a' typical rhetorical response and excuse. Nothing has changed.
Do me and yourself a favor: Put me back on ignore before I 'school' you somemore?
hey man, I never accused someone of assuming being wrong.
That is a blatant lie, and yes, I said lie. You habitually insinuate such upon me.
im just showing u that u also assumed.. bit hypocritcal?
We are all "hypocritical" at one time or another, as you have so eloquently pointed out, correct?
I understand I assume, I understand you assume... assume assume assume...big friggen deal.. I just thought id make a note of you attempting to put
people down, simply because they assume, yet you do the same as everyone else.
When I typically "put down" people for making assumption, it is pretty well assured that they are making half-baked 'Leave it to Beaver'
I never said I assumed 100% of time, nice generalisation there.
You did not have to, I said it based upon your postings and commentaries.
I assume they are lying to me on certain issues, issues that have greatly given them the advantage...[
Your "truth" gauge for determining which you believe "they" are lying to you on "certain issues" is what, exactly?
I never said conspiracy sites were god fact.. but again thankyou for your lame attempts there...
You did not have to "say" or admit such. Again, your postings on these type conspiracy topics speak for themselves in that you do virtually believe
all to most of what you read concerning these matters. "Lame" here is your making an excuse for what you are observed blatantly doing.
Why is it wrong for me to assume something on the internet is true, yet your in the right for assuming something on the TV is true?
More 'Leave it to Beaver' questions....:shk:
education period? im still waiting for proof of claims, that you failed to provide..
instead you provided things which were way off the mark in what you stated as fact.
Do a post history on me and you will see that my "proof of claims" has long been provided ages ago. I despise rehash or
and your right conspiracies theories need to be backed up by fact.
Speak English instead of making excuses for your lack of providing such factual evidences, k?
so does what the goernment tells you..
wake up mate.. if there was fact out there for either side.. we wouldnt be here DEBATING would we... do you understand the logic behind what is taking
There are more FACTS against
your and others alleged hypothetical 9/11 conspiracy theories than there are for. Hello?! Hence me saying
what other sane people are saying: Back your half-baked, flavor of the month 9/11 conspiracies with legit factual evidences instead of those
continually pulled and regurgitated from other conspiracy websites, you think?
I wont say what I really want to seeker, not because of the t and c's.. but gawd damit.. im just not as pathetic as some... maybe you should take
Certainly not taking "notes" from the likes of you. Bet.
"Pathetic" is relative to the individual asserting such.
Lastly, grow a pair, then perhaps you will be able to say that which you are simply not, despite your dismissal of the terms and conditions of this
site. Your making an excuse for your inabilities, k?
[edit on 19-10-2006 by Seekerof]